Unibet Community

Ask questions, get help and enjoy Unibet
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
JRE Rank 14
Rank 14
unibetslowplay Rank 9
Rank 9
If a table is playing for its Max it would be good that the two losers get something decent to avoid it being a sour experience for two of three.
0 Likes
Reply
Farseer Rank 12
Rank 12

Such fast-paced game with almost 7% rake with almost no rakeback seems ultimate raketrap to me. Only one who is going to win is Unibet.

With such structures maybe 2% (max) rake could be justified.

Reply
wwaanneess Rank 17
Rank 17

will rakeback be in direct points or also with challenges? (hope first)

cheers

Reply
Janek Rank 10
Rank 10

@Farseer wrote:

Such fast-paced game with almost 7% rake with almost no rakeback seems ultimate raketrap to me. Only one who is going to win is Unibet.

With such structures maybe 2% (max) rake could be justified.


+1

Reply
unibetslowplay Rank 9
Rank 9
Most drawn to this type of game have no concern or consideration for the level of rake (sadly).

My bigger concern is how terrible were the rejected names for this game that "Hexapro" was the one that was chosen? I can think of 50 better ones off the top of my head right now while juggling and chewing food.
Reply
EsaPerse Rank 6
Rank 6

@unibetslowplay wrote:
Most drawn to this type of game have no concern or consideration for the level of rake (sadly).

My bigger concern is how terrible were the rejected names for this game that "Hexapro" was the one that was chosen? I can think of 50 better ones off the top of my head right now while juggling and chewing food.

Yeah the name is allmost as bad as the structure, rake and the prizepools but out of curioisity could you reveal those names? @unibetslowplay

Reply
Patsgnome Rank 10
Rank 10

Will there be alerts in the client when someone hits the highest multiplier so we can rail the games?

Reply
Unibet Poker Expert Patric-Unibet
Unibet Poker Expert

To answer some questions here:

No, railing will not be possible at any time, at least for now.

We are aware that not everybody is happy with the format or structure, it is meant to be mostly a mobile friendly game and in those, the majority of the players want to play fast. So making the low multipliers faster than the higher ones made sense to us.

You receive one challenge point per cent, similar to MTTs, however if you compare our loyalty system (+ the great promotions we will be running about this) to the compatitors, you will be able to notice that we offer a competitive loyalty system.

I'm aware that the format is not for everyone but I kindly ask you to be patient and wait what effects it will have, you can't compare us to sites like PokerStars or PartyPoker that make their main income through poker. We will be able to cross sell a lot more through other products and hopefully create a nice and healthy balance of recreational and regulars. It is afterall a great product to introduce someone new to poker and that used to only play casino or sportsbetting before.

Thanks

Reply
psrquack Rank 24
Rank 24

Btw @Patric-Unibet: if we are speaking about loyalty, why you don't implement a private freeroll as reward to the bonus milestone system? For me it would be an ideal choice organizing the quackroll again.

Reply