Pionrj

1 hour ago, Estzen said:

You look to your cash game results and see, that Site A is much more worse. 

But maybe their just incomparable already because the PLO % of volume is much higher compared to other option. 

And my question was. Is the PLO %wise comparable to the other sites when you look these numbers or not.

Now I think I got it. 

I play hardly any Holdem CG, so that's not something I can compare. All I can compare is the ratio with my PLO CG and MTTs. Those are pretty much the same on those two main sites I play. And result wise also close to each others. Volume differs each month, but I think that in a year those are very similar also. 

But I don't really compare games like that so I don't have exact numbers, because I play everything and I don't have any kind of "goals" in poker. I love winning and I hate loosing. On poker I win more often then I loose, I can do it from home and I like it very much atm. I might get bored again and have a break of an year or two at any moment. This is not my job, so I don't really need to do this. 

1 minute ago, Estzen said:

No need to feel stupid. 

Yeah, of course with such volume it is not much to compare with . 

What I previously asked was, if the other sites also include PLO HHs in the same %wise of hands vs Holdem etc.

Thats what I basically asked. 😛

Still not sure what do you want to know 😂  

Do I play as much PLO CG %wise on other sites from my volume? No, I play much more CG on other sites compared to MTTs.

Do I have better EV/ROI on CG than on tournaments in other sites? Yes to both, but that's purely because of the volume and RB+different rake races which makes it more profitable than MTTs. Just for example, I'm getting 70% RB from CG(50% bonus) when I get 20% from MTTs on one site atm.

Did I answer your question? 😅

3 minutes ago, Estzen said:

No what I meant was, since other sites have diffrent results for you in cash and better results as you said. I was thinking if you play PLO in other sites by these same margins to. So it be could be compareble data . Because if you dont, your data for comparsion is skewed by this variable.

In terms of players Im pretty sure, Unibet mostly is weaker playerpool in all grounds. 

I feel a bit stupid, because I really don't understand the question here. I don't play enough on Unibet to compare basically any of my games to other sites atm. I don't have even 1400 hands played in CG this and last month combined. 

3 minutes ago, Estzen said:

So the question also becomes - does PLO include the comparsion to other sites or not?

And yes in terms of hands - the 7 buyins is probably meaningless number 😄 . Your right in that. 

Do you mean, how the game/pool plays out on Unibet compared to others? Soft or hard?

If that's the question, I don't really have an answer. I don't have nearly enough hands here to say anything. Only thing I know, that players on Unibet love to limp/flat more.

@Estzen This is not the case with me. I'm playing 4-5 days a week same cash games on other sites and I'm clearly beating those playerpools. Then I play cash games 4-5 days in a month on Unibet. I just went through all my big pots from the biggest loosing days and why I lost was very clear. The biggest days I lost 7 BINs on PLO25 including almost 4 BINs payed as a rake. So not even bad. I lost 8 BINs by going all-in as a 60-70% favorite on flop or turn and lost the pot. So that's just variance. Running hugely under EV tho. That should turn around if I'd just increase volume. But I'm not planning to do that, because there's no action at morning/day time.

1 hour ago, Andy-Unibet said:

It should count all buy-ins, regardless of cash/ticket. What period did you request? I can give you your tournament history to compare if you want?

 

I didn't ask any specific period and I don't really need a history. There is at least missing the 250€ Supermoon. That's how I noticed it.

E. That's not right either. Looking at the hand history there's only 2 tourneys played for me on those two days and the spreadsheet says 4 and 9?

I just asked this morning my Poker results from CS and received four spreadsheets to my email, which show my daily results. First I was just amazed how bad I'm doing in the cash games, but looking through my few biggest loosing days I can't say I was playing bad.  But that's another thing.

In the other hand, according to those spreadsheets I'm doing well in the MTT's. Something didn't just add up. There's at least some BIN's missing which have been made with tickets. Why is that? Is it same with CG, if you loose a ticket it doesn't count as a BIN? SNG's? Hexas?

Could you tell me how it works?

@Andy-Unibet @Stubbe-Unibet

Suing them because of 4,26€? GL with that! 

1 minute ago, OTTO said:

Twice second today (FFP2)   means a Supermoon ticket?

Quote

In order to qualify for any of the added value, you'll need to play with a table alias that is identical or very similar to your community one! - No exceptions to this rule.

OTTO=FFP2? Works for me.

22 minutes ago, Merenitsu said:

The interesting thing is that he called the raises preflop and after the flop with trash. And got the blocked ace on the turn.

That PF call is pretty light, but not the worst. Just take a look of your own previous Omaha post and compare his hand strength to yours in those. 

And that flop he can not fold. He has an open ender, backdoor flush draw and the low back door straight door. He is not blocking his own outs like you are. 

2 minutes ago, Merenitsu said:

After the turn I checked and he maxed. The first hand showed that he moved all in with 2 pair after the flop. This speaks of aggression, therefore, in this hand he could have anything.

Oh. I looked position's wrong first. Taught you were in position, but you x/r flop, turn x/c and x/c river? 

This is pretty lame to brag with and should be easy to beat. But I started. Your turn @FreedoM

E. And pretty much thinking of Game Lab the same as said above by Estzen. Doesn't really give any additional value to my game, but it's a nice idea. I like to go through all the crazy hands tho which others played to get those crazy 1000bb+ pots.

2 minutes ago, pinki said:

what for ? 🙂 he saw "Three of a kind" and felt as a god. Of course the format of the game does not matter. With aa-jj in hand,  the other cards are irrelevant - he treats them like premium hands in holdem 🙂

he will not tell you how he bid in the last hand, the final result matters to him🤪

Well, that first "pot" bet is not exactly wrong. I would like to know what happened after that and when were they all-in. 

And to be honest, I don't it's not wrong to busto there. Maybe he will tell us how the betting went down. 

@Samba Might have more experience tho from Unibet playerpool. But drawing to nuts still on turn with second set + A blocker is not a fold in my game at least. Maybe take easy with betting yourself after turn. And try to check it to showdown. 

That's just super #0lucky. Could you post also actions in text(E. from that second hand(AJJT))? Those bet sizes looks a bit weird.

Whole site is lagging. @Stubbe-Unibet Can you fix it fast?

8 minutes ago, Merenitsu said:

These were tickets from Twitch Ian. In 4 of them I lost with the best hand. QQ < AK 2 times. QQ <55 2 times. I lost at 5 because of my mistakes. It's not about the field, but about 0 lucky. If it seems to you that the micro-limiter plays at 25 euros. I'll tell you that I played 10, 50 Unibet Open  qualifiers a lot.

I've played also those UO qualifiers and it really does not differ much from micros or even freerolls when basically 95%+ got their tickets to those from freerolls. 

I'm just waiting @Jami-Unibetto get back to us with his hunch. 

I have also a video that is again to big to download here. I downloaded that newest version and there was no lag in chips or other animations. But response time was pretty big with any action I did. I'll drop the quality of the video and will send it to you. 

45 minutes ago, Stubbe-Unibet said:

That's a bug, but not even sure how that's possible, as it's a server thing and no changes there before Tuesday. 

I tested myself and so did Relax, and we haven't been able to reproduce this one. Can you share a screenshot of the issue?

I took one with my laptop. I'm not home now, but I'll send it to you when I get back. 

E. Happened only once. I joined 4 tables I think. 

4 hours ago, Rushbie said:

Yes more beer.

On tuesday? That's some pro stuff there. I was waking up when you were opening a new one 😂

@Stubbe-Unibet Is it a bug or by design, but I can see avatars and aliases before I've dealt a single hand in CG.

@LivertoolThat's something I was "worried" about the first week. Why doesn't it show up as "done"? Can't be that difficult to make it that way, when it's like that in Poker missions. 

@LivertoolI was expecting something like this and that's just why I didn't contact CS at all. Loosing these three weeks rewards is about 10€ of value, so not that much. I just think that it's even less for Unibet, but might have bigger impact in future when they run campaigns this way. 

E. I really just don't want them to telling me to do something, what they can do themselves. Had the same going on when the one Mobile version on Poker didn't open Hexapros when those started. They can see that I registered, paid and sat out the whole tourney. Like I would ever do that on purpose? 

13 hours ago, Livertool said:

One price got delivered now, still waiting on other.

I got nothing. How can this be so bad? That's two weeks now without any and one week with the lowest level price even tho I made the tasks for the third level price. 

@Jami-Unibet

5 hours ago, Kevathallam said:

My Unibet account is back up and running thanks to Ian Simpson and Andy Paton . Missed at least one week of the league so any chance of winning any prizes has gone out the window .

I don't think so. You still have a chance on both medium and high. Two wins out of 4 remaining in either one and you're in top3 for sure. 

E. Might not be enough to top3 in medium. But at high should be.