Estzen

Merenitsu should start to sue Unibet, its clear that Unibet has favoring odds for you!🤪

You need to go to the MTT world and lose 4k in a month. (my record downer so far) xD

Small field MTTs lower the varience, Unibets playerpool isnt as strong as some other sites etc. I think you are convincing yourself in something where you are unable to face the fact that you are still losing. Its not Unibet, Its you. You need to work on yourself.

Your head plays a lot of tricks to you

I think an instance that doesnt come up much, is if you know someone is overpot jamming his lower-portion draws then. And if you have seen someone do it consistently, you can start to call some AK and specially Axs - but like... still not really. Its very specific and interms of population we should not make such calls where we get 34% MDF, where in real world people are maybe like bluffing less than 5% in these spots for real. So it just becomes suicide to make these calls.

Dont have time? Dude, that is so fundamental that you have know even just by intuition at least where you stand in such stuff. Pot-odds - if you dont have time, you ll never understand stuff.

It really doesnt matter, its much better to compare a sunrun of some PKO where every marginal gets thorugh. Its not the game, its you.

Congradz, super good result! 💯

Most cases fold, I cant think of an exception where I would call. Maybe a rebuy tournament with a gamble to get better starting stack <- but in the long run, its a losing strategy ofc.

Its funny that people can accept seeing 0 coming 3x in a row at roulette wheel, but they are unable to fathom with losing with AA 5times in a row.

@WuDuHUDs are pretty big advantage for regulars who know how to use them. The problem with HUDs and Microstakes is that even tho, it helps to see a bit clearer awareness for your table - it usually is a very vague and broad idea how someone like that looks at that. Unless you dont have a hud, I actually wouldnt recommend playng at PS. Even tho, of course its pretty clear that you can make money playng without a hud too. Just if a player with same skill level plays with a hud, he makes more money than without it. For me tho, the real value of tracker is a good ability to track your own hands. In an environmental sense tho, I like where Hudless networks have pushed that.

@Boby Seriously telling a story of 3 times getting bad beats by the same player is the etalon for judging RNG is working? 🤣 Im glad Im in this community because in here, from time to time, I can really see how diluded some players are...

How ever much ridicule you put here, we all know Wakko is miles better player. These costs arent expensive.

Im doing the Hexa mission 😄 it will probably be a loooooong wait...

Sure, if your poker income is 0, teaching money comes in handy, don't you agree? NO I dont, because compentance can be proven by statistics. I think you naivly paranoid because you havent been able to reach over the top. And you conclude that it must be others fault not yours. However I believe that these guys are the absolute minority! Whenever you have a business field that promises you fast, easy or a lot of money, while at the same time you have no real entrance barriers and accountability is also pretty low, you have scum flocking towards this field. I dont think people who are world class crushers are somekind of minority... And compentant guys usually dont tell you that you become world class pro over night. Its rather amateurs own perspective that is usually so much dunning-kruggered that they think, that get there - easier than it seems. All other kinds of gambling sell-outs are complitely opposite fields and are uncompareable to poker. If we look Chess promotions in coachings and stuff, in some clip sure it gets a bit marketed and its "easyness" is inflated with emotion in a particular marketing clip, but that doesnt mean that payng these coaches wont actually make someone a better player its rather the complite opposite, those who dont put their own hand into it, wont improve as quickly than those who pay for their learnings. Then it can also be the case, that for some people, they just are unable to handle it... and their unable to face the fact that they cannot handle it. Real hard truth.

Seems very reasonable I think as long you can keep the gambling rules in control, its gonna be a good year for you! How is the rake managed now for Germans?

That was very true in the old era, but nowadays its a totally flawed thinking. It was the same simplistic mindset that suggested, that after people start streaming at twitch, everyone will become totally exploitable by it. There are many reasons why giving out knowledge is actually benefitial. 1. First of all, people who wont work hard enought will never catch your own learning curve. 2. Teaching something builds your own neural networks and makes you much better in already known concepts too. 3. Collective knowledge and discussion builds new information by interaction - that knowledge is benefictial to everyone.(who has a working mindset ofc.) 4. Buisness gives you much steady income to your poker side and is a good value to have at the same time, since its linked into game and remains "interconnected activity". Could come up with some reasons more... but I'd just end by sayng that being paranoid and being constructively sceptical are not the same thing.

It was much more response to your training site posts. I'd encourage you to listen to anyone who better. "Did you mean I shouldn't put my opinion/advice into a public forum?" - No. " do you mean I shouldn't spam it with gifs that I think are funny when I have a good time and I'm a little drunk and blast away at the tables?"- No "Or is it about something else entirely?" - It was about encouraging you to take any step to get better with chosen effort, if it is something you think and feel is what you really want to.

@FreedoM@WuDu I'd encourage Freedom to take time and learn from anyone whos better. To guys like WuDu I say that, while there sure are clickbait pointless developers who dont have necessarily the best knowledge, or sometimes people "lack skills for teaching" (even tho they are exceeding compentant players, but not so good at exceeding stuff.) With figuring things out on your own, is really not entirely, but usually a pretty stupid idea. The reason people who have used training sites and wont exceed is usually not becuase its a some bs, but rather that it takes much more effort and devotion like dedication, with very good stress tolerance included into this commiment. And if people cannot handle one of these areas, they will just NEVER MAKE IT. There are so many people who start to seriously study and after 3 months they realize that this shit is all harder than they thought... And unfortunately all people are not equal, otherwise everyone of us could have all the same chess ratings too... (As a non-poker book that can help many serious people IF you are a reading person, I'd recommend to read "The art of learning" By Josh Waitzkin, a former US Chess champion, a child prodigy, who later quited chess went into Tai Chi, helped some older chess programs like Chessmaster) (Studing is hard) Putting up and immense study and training stuff is for sure one of the reasons I am still playng poker... and people who think studying is a waste, are just - stupid people. But well, since some people like to make their deposits for me, I cant fault them for making them for me. I actually dont fault gambling for "free time". Even tho its very small portion of my "given up money". But im not one of those guys at the same time, who would bash gamblers as a chosen activity. In my view only losing addicts are a problem, but I think it reasonable for a casino to build a buisness on an opportunity for entertainment. But anyway back to Freedom, - I have no idea what this guys resume is and how good is that platform, but generally paid content pays dividends just like at the old times reading books was a run-up for success. I think the point people could start payng stuff with their winnings, it starts to get "less expensive". There are also some people, who buy stuff and then never work it out...(from a mere statistic point, its actually a great deal of people) In some sense the more non-neurotic you are, the easier it is to succeed... and hot-heads with high IQs is sometimes even a worse combination than people who can manage themselves and take their head up while not being a genius. Maybe its a good start for new year, but it takes to sleep, dream and eat with poker... value compentance over everything and follow it to the death. (I realize not everyone is doing it, but thats also why some people are winners and some people are losers.... it seems that some people just want to be losers too) Sorry for the long one, just somewhy it made me write it in this morning...

Wow, that hand is pretty unlucky, dont beat yourself too hard 😉

Somewhy cannot edit. Anyway, Ive had my blitz over 1300+, so thats why I said that, from remebrance I can tell you, that you just need to get better in Rapid and if you do, you will eventually get better at Blitz. Also learning to attack better, not making "time wasting moves" etc.

Not finding a joke of it, but I do know that you are a legit player, thats why it seemed even more weird! (

People have diffrent personalities and diffrent wishes. Avatars are cool, promoted software is even better.

Make Community Event Avatar. for best of 3. xD

Chess: you need to learn more theory, Ive been at same point where you are . Currently my blitz is same like your, because im not actively so much taking much time. My suggestion is, study more stuff for Rapid games play some Rapids, and eventually your blitz rating will climb with it since your overall understanding grows and also lessens your blundering spots or making a mistake out of the opening.