Estzen

After just reading blogs for fun, I decided to try one SNG, which I dont almost never play here. But for sure €4 SNGs are like 1euro's. If you would work for it, its for sure possible to build something from there. But their still pretty hyper-structure. Im not sure what the adequate BRM should be for them tho since im not so familiar with 5max SNGs since mostly SNGs are dead format after getting so much solved that edges become too small in high stakes. But in the micro sense, not much has changed.

Why dont you just use all money for poker instead of playng roulette and horses? Or is it more for a fun - because its pretty clear that if you want to build a bankroll it will never happen like this - just a hard truth.

I ve never understood that logic of going higher when your losing 😄 ! I know a friend whom I have coach from very bottom, and he had previously done the same many times. It should never be even an option.

I wonder how much the rake is of it, but then again if a winning player it wouldnt even matter, because eventually all missions will be +EV anyway.

Is the comet only at fridays? I was tired and I didnt use my 50 eur comet ticket, will it be all wasted now with no way of usage? @Leo-Unibet

Ive had it with client too. Just recently after update, two things can sometimes happen: 1. Poker client frozes. 2. Poker cöient closes itself without warning -this one has happened even in the middle of the hand one time. The client clearly has problems. But. I’ll give credit, that Partypoker has the most annoyng software, and eventho their much bigger enterprise, Unibet is miles ahead of them. Unibets Android version with betslider is also one of the most comfy apps I know! Better than stars, gg, whatever... so Unibet with its bugs, is still SUPER GOOD.

Theres a site where I play freeroll that gives spins. Even tho I dont play slots with my money at all, its fun to play a free stupid spin. XD

Lol 😄😅🤣 thats a bad place to be. Well, I ll sooth you with the fact that last time, I got 70cents form this "free spins". Seems its not giving up much, so you dont lose much specially if had previous issues with slots. 😕 But ofc "free" stuff is always cool. Maybe they could give a 50 cent ticket for poker in exchange of that.

Yes I do understand econonomics and how money exchanges and bookers make money. I really dont think theres much to beat that bush around. You still havent grasped the 2nd part which was written by me with 3 lines. All you did was read 1 and tell me that Im an idiot. Have a nice day sir.

@Pionrj I dont consider small samplesizes much of beating. You do seems like. I didnt compare games I compared a mindset of overconfident and wishful-thinking side of brains.

@Pionrj - Merenitsu level . Ok thanks for the insult. Actually its you who doesnt understand what your talking about. The losing players are irrelevant for beating sports betting. Since you really are competing against odds that are laid out by proffessional collectives of booking side. And if you wont make enough correct bets that make you profit, you wont profit in the long run. The amount of losing players is totally a diffrent issue. But ofc you can keep believing what you want, some people apparently are sure of playng roulette "proffessionally" too.

No Im not wrong, because people just telling their info in "google" are just opinions not facts. Its a small field of winners just like in any such field of interest, otherwise the bookies could not be winning, because the winners would just out beat them so much that bookies would be all broke. Logically there can only be a very thin field of real winners, because mathematically otherwise would be just impossible and full of wishful-thinking!

In reality - there isnt so much pro sportbettors. I dont believe it, because its very hard to archieve. Your basically playng against the odds vs the casino. And if you can be profitable its only if you put up as much work in these statistics as the casino working teams who calculate the odds so that it would be profitable for the casino. The thing is from time to time, these teams can be WRONG too. And some people could find these mistakes and use it for gain. But in that level it is an insane amount of work. We cannot talk about winnings runs for few months... we are talking about a long volume of bets and being profiable in a very big sample size. Its probably possible, but its very very rare for individuals. And stock day trading is a good parallel, where 90, to 95% of people think their winners, but are all losers. As a constant psychology field reader and studier, from a technical point of view - its intresting to see how biased people by general population are. Dunning-Kruger is massive and almost everywhere....

@David_Front242 The truth is. Unibet is much easier place to play, if you are not winning. Because it has smaller playerpools and it eventually gives much lesser varience. If you cant win in here, you cant win in stars eventually... If you are winning in stars, then either your samples are indiffrent to comparing or you ve just not played enough.

This is a very nice post. It takes an effort to understand and say the problem. What buyins you usually play when you play poker. I also would like to know, what is so intriguing about slots, and how does it react with you? Sports betting I sometimes do, but only when I watch something specific. Its much more a fun even to cheer for someone, but I havent find sports betting very good investment, even tho I guess its possible for some super-serious math guys who can eventually make some goods. But its probably as hard as day-trading proffessionally. Ive loved tables games, but in them its pretty apparent that they can only be played for fun. For me - roulette and blackjack would be these options. Usually I have played only with very small amounts. Im glad you've taken such a responsibility.

I as a reg tell you - this post is just nonsense and you should learn to play - or not play at all xD.

same thing here on Windows 10

This is insane, UNIBET supprot, nowhere available - just awful . Not even a message.