Estzen

@SCOBY - cant really say anything about just runouts. No stack sizes, no action history. And if these were just happy single raised pots, then theres also not much to say, because in both cases both hands are calling 100% to any bet on the flop for sure. And the fact that they get there, vs an overpair is a fact we need to accept. Nothing about luck or silly hands. Its just unrealistic to think we win with these hands every time. And for certainly if we complain about 2 hands, could be even 20 runouts as such - it really isnt a realistic number to complain about the losses. If bankroll cannot handle these runouts, certainly a sign for playng lower. <- could also be a factor here.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Dont you think that if Unibet would be rigged, no1 would go to tournaments in the long run and also there would be more comments in here talking about the outcomes🤔

I dont see, a ball landing on the sides and stayng there, much of an "impossibility" from a physical stand point. So what is there really to clarify? One way is to make slides more slippery. We didnt see what happened after in clip. But I think the simple solution for that short instance is to re-run it. And later take a look how to make it better for not happening. No point to see some conspiracy. Sure, addicts can always go that road, good luck to them.

I mean imo, its pretty pointless to base cheating explainations on very small occurances. Since casino already makes money by pure math, there is absolutely no point to cheat in any sense. Specially when the betting sums are 'meaningless' in terms of their revenue.

I guess its possible after all the wheel is moving and gravity exists, but probably really unlikely. I hope they made a re-spin.

Yeah I had to login and see. This really is bad change. The funny thing is, actually 6max is better for stronger players, but I just dont like the format itself. AndI didnt see 9max bounties much struggling so’ really a bizarre change that closes option variety, and I will just play fallingstars less. If they keep making it worse, at some point leave.

Im gonna tell up front, that if you guys keep making such bizzarre changes, at some point I may withdraw everything, and move out.

Wth? All games 6max. Bye bye u i then

If you have had such issues, the rules should be very rigourous for you and over-weighted, because of compromise. If you are unable - you will never archive it. 😉 its that simple.

It seems you go that route for last 2 years. Does it ever occur to you that you shouldnt make same mistake twice? You want things to fast and have really an unrealistic hopes of getting it even bigger. Someone whos winning in small games, it would take maybe a month to double it sometimes. A lack of patience is a big ruiner here. Could you ever change these things?

At first I thought, its poker history 🤣. Then I saw, oh roulette . Last time I played roulette, I lost like 80 euros 😄. I almost never play those, Im not sure when is the next time xD.

UOS will be for sure cool. I really like the last one. In terms of frustration somehow its the opposite for me, cash frustrates me a lot more while MTT swings are always handleable even tho, they can last forever in big fields. The longest downswing has been like 3 months. But overall, it seems to make a lot more money. Im pretty calm to coolers and stuff, the most frustrating thing that can happen is that I yell in a rare occasion and thats like maximum. But Ive heard people throw stuff, break stuff - all of it. xD This time I will be even more active at UOS than I was last time, since with time, my BR is much better. Cash game is intresting to study tho since, the high heads of it are brilliant guys.

Titan is pretty long tournament, but seems pretty good. Sputniks are great. Good job at winning! Yesterday, I was debating myself to register Titan or not, but after it being 55minutes already running, I decided not to take a late reg. Since I didnt felt I wanna go on play 5 hours more. I still had some games running, but I didnt wanna add stuff anymore. I would be a bit careful with 10euros at such BR.(Tickets are okay ofc). What is your volume, how much do you play?

It all good, but in the end, people who play cash rake more and are more probable to win these races 😉

Big volume can be built, its just not as comparable as some bigger sites. I think the best part is rather small fields, cuts varience a lot. 😉 Everything combined sure - really good. But I was talking in a more wholistic picture. Anything negative degrades experience.

Well let me tell you. Theres a company, another casino site. They call me ask diffrent questions, sometimes give a ticket or some freebie for it. It makes people feel comfortable and happy. In this example my focus isnt whats being done, but how it makes people feel. I think its somewhat every such enterprises goal to make customers feel good - this intern builds clientbase. An attitude. Also in terms of money - we are not even talking so huge amounts - rather this is very small for enterprises like that. So 8 players, 10 players - itsnt a huge number, but isnt about the numbers - its how people feel against the company. Missing these spots is really a bad option to take. In the long-term its a clear missing of the mark.

😮 Wow, thats sure intresting. Haha, to pick bonuspoints more instead of spins and abuse it that way. I think a more logical option would be to cancel compensation on intented occurances because it also can be detected if someone starts to repeat it. For instance, if you make this mistake once, you probably remember the frustration and in turn, will be careful next time. If someone starts to say that he misclicked again, its not very likely. - So instead of banning compensation, it would need a clause of re-occurances by default. And then not compromise that one no matter what someone says. Because this one would be very clear imo. But rare occurances do happen, and it really sucks when you are said - nothing can be done.

How can there be even an option to cancel free spins? If this is so, this is really a stupid option by the casino that should be taken away. This really is a shame.

I have not canceled anything to my knowledge.

Huh what?

@PionrjNo, it didnt. Either Im miscommunicating or you dont read exactly what I ask 😄 . Good example of text communication problems. It doesnt matter much anymore, but for the sake of explaination I try one time more. What Im asking is´: lets say you have site A and site B. Site A you play 50% PLO, 50% Holdem. Site B you play 10% PLO, 90% Holdem You look to your cash game results and see, that Site A is much more worse. But maybe their just incomparable already because the PLO % of volume is much higher compared to other option. And my question was. Is the PLO %wise comparable to the other sites when you look these numbers or not. 😄

No need to feel stupid. Yeah, of course with such volume it is not much to compare with . What I previously asked was, if the other sites also include PLO HHs in the same %wise of hands vs Holdem etc. Thats what I basically asked. 😛

No what I meant was, since other sites have diffrent results for you in cash and better results as you said. I was thinking if you play PLO in other sites by these same margins to. So it be could be compareble data . Because if you dont, your data for comparsion is skewed by this variable. In terms of players Im pretty sure, Unibet mostly is weaker playerpool in all grounds.

So the question also becomes - does PLO include the comparsion to other sites or not? And yes in terms of hands - the 7 buyins is probably meaningless number 😄 . Your right in that.