Jump to content
Unibet Home
Poker Community

pinki

Group: Four Of A Kind
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    213

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Posts posted by pinki

    Euros kick-off competition! €4000 up for grabs!

    in Community Promotions

    Posted

    22 minutes ago, SCOBY said:

    😬As usual, only lies, although in the end they will be credited, but for such lies should leave all members, if you are not able to pay do not organize such contests, as if we are in movies with fools , but it always happens at such contests, when you have to be serious and keep your promises, ??? shame the great "UNIBET" with such promises.

    Something like that, nowhere, only at unibet, other sites, when I promote something they keep their word, here a total disaster in the organization.

    @SCOBYwhat are you saying man,  where do you see some lie here ? i've noticed a lot of venom in your posts for a long time, I don't want to look for the roots of this behavior - i remember you as a cheerful user. What did you not understand in previous Jami's posts? Really chill out. Maybe a walk, cold beer🤫

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1
    • Sad 1

    Euro 2020

    in Betting and Sports

    Posted · Edited by pinki

    1 hour ago, psrquack said:

    Shame on me, but forgot to say a congratulation to England reaching the final. Their right wing played brilliantso yes, they deserved it.

    @psrquack it's not about whether someone deserved it or not - the Danish coach's tactic probably assumed an extra play - although in this case for me 3 changes should be left at the end. At this level, it is also influenced by the fact that the Danes had a long journey and changed time zones a few days earlier (watch that match and see how this team was getting tired then, sick temp. then). So it was natural for them to aim for a penalty shootout in overtime - when they looked physically weak. 

     

    copied from another place: 

    Here the problem is with the var protocol - there was minimal contact and such information was received by the judge from var-judges - the question is - why didn't the judge go to the monitor? Such situations were the reason why I stopped watching football many years ago and you can see that even with video replays there are problems here. I will never understand why the judge (one person) in this discipline has so much power . in this situation, there were several variables to assess this situation - one of them: was minimal contact and whether the Sterling would get to a position from which to pass/shoot? simply from this action there would be no further goal (Vestergaard had decent position to touch the ball first) and the team got a better opportunity to score a goal from the penalty spot. the second problem here is that players know how to act in such situations - and it is a problem in this discipline that acting often wins here. I talked about it many times with my friends - such a player should be excluded for at least 20-30 international matches for the stake and half a season in the league - then the next time he would come to the referee himself and tell what was the truth - Only in this situation the most important thing is whether it was an action with a potential goal - maybe 2m + higher yes but here i doubt it.
     
    The problem with var is also in the case of corner kicks - which in my opinion should also be evaluated quickly by var. Simply var protocol is broken - you can really make some quick rules here - only you can see that someone does not have the will to do this and still leaves important decisions in the hands of the referee, who should only clean up during the match - nothing more.
     
    In my opinion, the free kick option inside the penalty area is used too rarely - this situation was perfect for that.👍

    The poker chit chat

    in General Poker

    Posted

    15 minutes ago, Pionrj said:

    Did you forget what you wrote yourself last week. River can change it all. And when it does, you come here if it's against you?

    @Pionrjwrong, without flop and turn you dont have any river... correct answer :  whole board can change it all 👍  I have said it many times that e.g. preflop allin doesn't matter if the river/turn/flop kills you - the order of the cards does not matter in this case, period.

    • Thanks 1

    Euros kick-off competition! Game bundle 7!

    in Community Promotions

    Posted

    1 hour ago, GR1ZZL3R said:

    It's hardly surprising there is some confusion as the odds quoted are the normal full time odds which of course include a draw. If the draw is excluded then the match result odds should have been used which are quite different.

     

    1924756841_Screenshot(578).png.d1983c7803dbe848d214d5c88b348d0d.png

     

    I'm sorry to say this but quoting odds where one result is not possible rather than the correct odds is negligent, as was not making it clear in the opening post. 😭

    @GR1ZZL3Rtrue , "Team to go through" should be or to count 'draw/penalties' including overtime👍

Gambling can be addictive. Play responsibly.

Copyright 2021, Unibet. All rights reserved.

"UNIBET" is a registered trademark. UNIBET is not affiliated or connected with sports teams, event organisers or players displayed in its websites. UNIBET is not affiliated or connected with any mobile brand

This website is operated by Trannel International Ltd whose registered office is Level 6 - The Centre, Tigne Point - Sliema, TPO 0001 - Malta

The official number and date of issue of the license is MGA/B2C/106/2000 issued on 1st August 2018 valid until 17th July 2028.Trannel International Ltd is licensed by the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA). This public regulatory body is responsible for the governance of all forms of gaming based in Malta. Find out more about the MGA at www.mga.org.mt

Gambling can be addictive. Play responsibly.

×
×
  • Create New...