Estzen

It would be good to keep playng 1 euro games in MTTs and cut out Hexapros - "remember your rule". Maybe instead play some SNGs instead of them. What would happen?

THis is a bit simplistic answer, but it may have some merit for thought. @Pionrj Tournament pools in general are a lot weaker than cash game fields. Cash games assume post-flop play much more. If someone has leaks he makes them there EVEN MORE therefore. Tournament players suck at post-flop. Yet its not entirely as simple, because the very thing makes MTTs for cash players much harder, because they dont know so much of diffrent stack-sizes necessarily and it can be pretty confusing since its all diffrent situations that you need to know. Ofc, a good reg in cash beats small touranaments purely by experience, because mistakes by players compensate enough... but in the objective sense with stronger levels, CG players start to hate MTTs the very reason. But ... in reality cash games are harder. I had a very significant aha-moment some time ago which changed my game a lot. So, since I m a MTT reg kinda purely. I didnt watch much cash stuff, until one day looking one high stakes overview by a very brilliant player. I realized "gosh, these guys are brilliant, and Im missing so many deep stack stuff that I can either impliment or use when playng side - in any sense these guys are crazy good and tournament players in the sense of post-flop are just shit, and I ve missed that for a looong time." ------ I pondered that a bit, and changed it to include in my studies. And guess what, it has changed many key things that irronically make me even more stronger in MTTs. 🤣 But thats the thing what "might" also explain why you have those results as that. 2 Key factors: 1. CG is harder, MTTs are weaker 2. CG assumes better understanding of post-flop theory.

@Stubbe-Unibet

I should have freespins, but suddenly I found that Im spinning for not free spins. Where did the free spins go? I should have 30 free spins for the mission.

ummm, for spin'n'gos are played like 300, 400 buyins. 25 games is NOTHING. Its varience is very high. I dont understand how someone who has played so long still doesnt know such things.

Love to hear the self awareness. Maybe its good for you then like this. I myself dont find 50s specially in Uni too hard. And with smaller fields the varience is pretty low. But it also comes down to personality. I dont tilt much, so this maybe also a thing. Live is a big risk and, but if able to win can also be a big boost for you. But in that sense your right, maybe you arent even ready for these yet, so theres no need to push yourself over your shadow. I really like that self-awareness part. I hope London is good!

Oh yeah, that the old Microgaming layout.

Probably everyday because its just a habit to click by. But there isnt much reasoning for that .

Very surprised! I thought your on your way to higher ups, but now you cannot do it. I understand that if you needed it for life reasons. But this also takes a lot of speed down from you archiving growth. Stick to the games you favour best 😉

Personally, Game Lab is a cool invention. But I dont find it very useful. Also the stats I am not so sure their so accurate. But seems its much more an "entertrainment tool" . The levels of unlocking stuff isnt so logical, yet its something - by that I mean that it doesnt make much a diffrence if I see what was my best hand or not etc. Its also intresting to note, that the base line isnt said out - its just told "these are good stats" "these are bad stats". For enterainment players its certainly a thing, and its probably the point. For proffessionals etc, I doubt anyone ever uses it in any sense of study. What is also very misleading is that 'School" doesnt show sample size - so specially for not very knowledgeable players they hardly realize it and could just be mislead. I think if we'd really want we could bring out more, but Im too lazy for that. But What I do like about it, is overall stats. Like MTT, Hexapro. bla bla it could be even better. Graphs would be cool too. I think it would be even more cool, if Unibet would add badges. But not just badges for "UOS" - like Stars has gone - having only very big badges.... But Having diffrent Badges that people can choose to show or not show. Unibet has many tournaments with specific names. And people would also know the meanings. Oh and sure the layout is nice!

I think 20 is an old and dated limit that can be used in micro, but really its not a good number to use if people want any adequate sense to rely on. But well, who am I to tell if people want to go broke or whatever other reason there is to. 😉 Most old stuff still repeat it, but simulations show a bit diffrent story.

It would be cool, if the diffrent variants would be separate leaderboards, but then again I understand from Unibet point of view its better to have it general. Tho its much harder to pay more rake with MTTs. 😄

Its not so important and usually I dont think about it, but this time, it was very surpising for me. And its first time in Unibet that Ive reached it. Also cool to getting payed which, but I find the opponents jam on turn jokey, since its was 4 ways start so he should be much stronger there - but its Unibet so cant be surprised. 🤣

From recent results I wouldnt suggest to move it so quick. Also going with 30 or 50 buyins is much more sane😉. Good luck on the grind!

I can be in too

-5.66/100 - should work more on your game and not go into 50NL for some time.

Or, few higher HEXAs and boom xD

Maybe - went 200NL and punted it xD

Few days ago, I had 10x multiplier in lower than that. But nice to get such money! If the win would be pictured from ending screen, probably would get more comments. I think .

Just better to do monthly missions, since thats the only time I take up cash games usually xD

@GR1ZZL3R Really loved your reply! Thank you for it! Maybe thats just me, but Cash Games are a lot harder to beat, even tho their with much less varience. Its probably because tournament playerpool in general is much weaker. I dont specialize cash games, Ive played some for fun, I probably beat the lowest, but I have no idea where my limit is since, its not something I do. Reading for sure is great. The better you build your basics, the more consistent you become. Preflop is king in very many places and even in midstakes+ people still err there. So its a good thing to take time and switch that study part and it will pay dividends later.

Maybe you cannot. But I'll add what I would do, or suggest for you to do. 1. I would make separate bankrolls in an excel file for everything. 2. Turning out to be losing 20 years in poker seems a lot, but admiting is always a good point in my opinion. Its much better than denial, sometimes even lightyears ahead of it! 3. Specially in smaller fields few wins can be pretty blinding for people, that further encourages them to play higher in actual fields that they will be a clear looser. Yet few wins makes them think that they are good to play there. 4. I find the biggest problem for many is that their looking for a big outcome, fast, here, and NOW. While not realizing that actually in the long run , already beating higher side'of micros can give pretty okay money in month , if play regulary with enough volume. Its even more significant for those who live in some 3rd world countries where beating very small game could already make someone play full time. 5. If you have played so long, it might be that you could actually work yourself profitable. But its also part what most players dont realize, it takes time and actual study to get somewhere. My old chess teacher had once a good analogy, that the reason why many nightly blitz players do not improve in their years and probably play almost 20 years the exact same strenght, is because all they do is play blitz and never study any theory. They just waste their potential. In poker I see its exactly the same thing the same analogy. 6. Im intrested about hearing the roulette part. And I wish you well, in gambling and in poker! I dont expect you to accept it, but nevertheless gaining and giving information is better than me not telling it.

I never had such a position. Its rather your inability to read what the other side is sayng. Go and read what was being said. And in sense of that exchange, dont bother to think we go for some other round. Because im not gonna do it after seeing from that attitude, that you are kinda arguing guy. So its pretty pointless for me in any sense. But for clarity I repeat again. That which you have implied to me, has NEVER been my position.

Maybe you cannot. But I'll add what I would do, or suggest for you to do. 1. I would make separate bankrolls in an excel file for everything. 2. Turning out to be losing 20 years in poker seems a lot, but admiting is always a good point in my opinion. Its much better than denial, sometimes even lightyears ahead of it! 3. Specially in smaller fields few wins can be pretty blinding for people, that further encourages them to play higher in actual fields that they will be a clear looser. Yet few wins makes them think that they are good to play there. 4. I find the biggest problem for many is that their looking for a big outcome, fast, here, and NOW. While not realizing that actually in the long run , already beating higher side'of micros can give pretty okay money in month , if play regulary with enough volume. Its even more significant for those who live in some 3rd world countries where beating very small game could already make someone play full time. 5. If you have played so long, it might be that you could actually work yourself profitable. But its also part what most players dont realize, it takes time and actual study to get somewhere. My old chess teacher had once a good analogy, that the reason why many nightly blitz players do not improve in their years and probably play almost 20 years the exact same strenght, is because all they do is play blitz and never study any theory. They just waste their potential. In poker I see its exactly the same thing the same analogy. 6. Im intrested about hearing the roulette part. And I wish you well, in gambling and in poker! I dont expect you to accept it, but nevertheless gaining and giving information is better than me not telling it.

Slots are not meant to give you money, they are meant to take your time and drain your money. It shouldnt be a surprise - its either just like going to the movies and payng for it, but this time, you can choose to pay even more.