Stubbe-Unibet

My personal view is that the structure should be less top-heavy than today, as it'll have the desired ecology effect. By making this change, it'll typically be top 5-6 getting less and all other positions more, which would also mean the min cash would generally be higher. It's ultimately up to Leo to decide what should be done :)

List of eligible players updated :)

Late, both legs stretched, sole first. If that's not a red, it's gonna be impossible to get one :D

@Livertool, please create a new thread ;)

Short answer is no. If you build a software that in any way interacts with the Unibet client - e.g. by collecting hands history/hands played - you'd be in violation of the T&C :)

@XY, create a new thread ;)

Have a feeling we may see something similar tomorrow in Arsenal game 😉 So,only "logical" bet is...Tottenham to win CL 🤣

RNG is broken

@Argevolen - Not sure what crazy conspiracy theory you got brewing :D - eCOGRA was founded by 3 different igaming companies if I remember correctly, but it's ownership changed many years ago - they obviously wanted to be completely independent given the nature of their business :) - Unibet was part of the Microgaming poker network - The RNG is not with us but the provider of the poker software (Relax gaming) - eCogra is independent of Unibet (but again, the RNG is not with us, so your question in this regard doesn't really make sense)

List of eligible players updated :)

@jonny2192, nice to have you back! :) Gonna build a roll from giveaways and freerolls again? Look forward to see you in Malta ;) No plans of introducing 1e to 20c exchangers and I'm afraid you can't save up 2000 € 1 tickets, as you can't exchange to € 1 tickets once you've got 20 of those ;)

I strongly disagree :) I do have a fair bit of experience discussing these things, and technical details will not convince anyone that the RNG works. It'll only result in more questions and a lot won't understand the details anyway. If someone thinks poker is rigged, they'll find the following points in pretty much all threads: - The RNG is on the providers end and it's tested by at least one independent company - In order to get the game licensed in local markets, the game(s) will usually have to be checked and approved by the local regulator - The provider doesn't benefit from a rigged RNG in any way, and neither do we - we make money from the rake/fee and don't care who wins - Poker makes up 2-3 % of our gross winnings revenue (and Relax obviously make quite a bit of money on casino games and bingo as well). Why on earth would we risk the entire business - if we were found to have offered a rigged poker game for years we'd very likely lose our licenses - by not having a proper RNG in place? Again, we don't really benefit from a RNG that doesn't work. If someone reads the above and still believe the game is rigged against him/her, I can assure you some technical details won't help one bit. Why would they believe some details posted on here, if they don't believe in common sense and independent verification :) So no, it doesn't make sense to post the details. All it'll do is waste time :)

Above info has been shared in the past on here, but I'm not sure about the GLI/TST involvement today, when it comes to poker - as you say, TST is/was part of GLI, but I don't believe they use that name anymore. Still, I simply don't see the value of going into the details :)

But why is it you want to know this? For the same reason company keep it in secret... So because of dev resources and not wanting to engage in an endless discussion regarding details that don't matter? ;)

But why is it you want to know this? Isn't enough knowing it's random? Or did you watch the pokerstars video and want to hack into the Relax lasers? ;) As I mention above, I really don't see the point in discussing this, and I'm never going to have dev resources spent on it - especially not now with the bugs we've got. My objective is no longer to build and grow the community, that's what Ray and Jeppe are here for :) I'm on here to turn a Trabant into a reliable Tesla 😏 My first priority is to improve the poker product, and I really don't have any interest in wasting time on discussing details around the RNG. I've always been honest and to the point, and that won't change. I don't think I'm ever offensive, but if someone got really thin skin and expect a sugar-coated teletubbies tone of voice and approach, some of my replies might not be to their liking. If someone ever felt offended by something I wrote, I'd encourage them to send me a PM and explain their view on things :)

@pinki, the RNG for slot games is on the game providers end :) the providers usually have more details on their website. NetEnt example here: https://www.netent.com/en/responsible-gaming/

@langeyyy, the change doesn't apply to tournaments already in the lobby when adding you. You should be able to use the ones tomorrow :)

List of eligible players updated :)

I really apprecaiated your answer. It's always pleasure having a friendly assistance from nice employees. How good to see having a promise in one topic and facing the reality in other. You guys are really awesome, and I'm really proud being a member of that helpful community leading by such an sacrificing leaders. Thanks again. Where was it promised you'd get all details about the RNG? If you were indeed promised this, I do apologize for not being able to deliver such. Again, I'm not going to waste development resources on a question that doesn't make any difference; random is random. Why do you need these details when it doesn't make any difference? Even if it didn't require development resources, I don't really see the need for this information to be made publicly available. I see two things happening: - An endless discussion around details and things that make no difference; wasted time from my end and anyone else on Unibet/Relax end who'd need to provide info - At the end of the day it won't change anything for any customers. It won't change the way you play - or change anything in general - as random is random I'm always happy to share info and details when it makes sense and I feel it'll be a valuable discussion - these valuable discussions is the main reason I'm on here and why I was driving the community project in the very beginning. This discussion will never be valuable but solely a waste of time, at least for me/Unibet/Relax.

Random is random. In other words it doesn't matter. It simply doesn't make sense to talk about the players actions having an impact. Again, it's random. I don't have all the info you request and I honestly see no point in getting it either. It's gonna take time from some developer, if I was to request the full details, so it's simply not going to happen :)

There's nothing more to share than what was shared in 2015 :) "Our exact RNG is an implementation detail that we do not wish to share, but it is a cryptographically secure pseudo random number generator that passes the statistical tests in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TestU01 . The RNG has also been verified by an outside company; eCogra ( https://www.ecogra.org), one of the largest and most recognized independent audit firm in the igaming industry, which continuously audits the software and RNG In poker, entire deck is shuffled once before the hand starts, using a simple algorithm (Knuth Shuffle, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher%E2%80%93Yates_shuffle ), that produces an unbiased shuffle, given that the RNG it relies on is unbiased."

List of eligible players has been updated again :)

Nice one Burki 🤣

Man. City had similar labels,but now whole world admires them and are a role model. 😉 Dont know,have watched them against Schalke and didn't impress me.Definitely not a material for such a strong competition,IMO. Indeed they have national players,but dont think those are for main stage,rather secondary roles. I remember K. Kampl,their main engine,never steped up in big games.I guess L. Klostermann and M. Halstenberg are good as they got NT calls,but ... Also,their attack is quite limited.Y. Poulsen had this "one time sesason",therefore dont expect similar next.Werner is Bayern's player next season... Will be interesting to see what can young Julian Nagelsmann teach those players that already have NT experience. Have to agree with @WuDu here. As much as I hate them, Leipzig have been playing really well and you shouldn't underestimate their chances in CL next season - just consider Schalke made it past the group stage this year 🤣 Yussuf is still young (24) and he hasn't been bad in the past 3 seasons, despite his goalscoring stats not being impressive. I wouldn't be surprised, if he manages to score at least 10 goals again next season :) @psrquack, I hope and think they'll go for a really experienced guy on a two-year contract (knowing Schalke it probably won't last that long), with the goal of going with Tedesco or another young coach again in a couple of years :)

@Stubbe-Unibet I presume this refers to myself as i cannot see tournys in lobby. What am i missing. @pirahn, nope, not you :) The tournaments show 23 hours before they run, hence there aren't any in the lobby now. Even without access you can see them, you just can't register