Pionrj

Damn. Having some family time at amusement park tomorrow. I'm trying to escape these dutys for a moment. GL @Thurddzzand @Seb-Unibet!

@SeizedProfessionalI'd like to say that you're wrong, but without any evidence or data can't do that. But I can explain why I see this differently. While I'm playin 6-9 max tournaments on other in the beginning of the tournament there's just as much crazy players as in Unibet. Fields are 3-6 times bigger, so chance to get these players again to your table is way smaller after the late reg than with Unibet. But occasionally you see them at FT or final two tables on other sites too.

Congratulations @Thurddzz! GG @Jami-Unibet

Yeah. GL to Jami also. Just a bit less luck than for Thurddzz.

I just noticed that @Thurddzz and @Jami-Unibet gonna play their match in 20mins. I'm at least gonna rail this and cheer for Thurddzz.

Can't really agree with anything else than that players are more aggressive than before on average. As long as I've played online(since 2008) I've seen very strange, crazy and even stupid hands at showdowns. I had a couple years break tho, but I don't think that all the nitts played then and suddenly stopped when I started again. Unibets platform doesn't really differ from others even tho the field is way smaller. There's always players like Scoby who think that percentage doesn't matter at all, because you can't know what is dealt on the table. It's not because they've learnt something. And this thread is a good proof of it. Shove a "decent" PF, loose it and get mad. Even tho percentages were against you when you made the move. Win from a clear underdog position with a bad call and everything is just fine.

Worked well with laptop. No need to panic anyone. I'm in.

I've tried four times in an hour or so. I'll try with laptop. Thanks @Purps

I was sitting on my couch watching TV.

@Jami-UnibetI don't know if you're know this but haven't worked since the starting line-ups came out.

I try to explain this to me. If i understood wrong, please tell me. So, you think that 7+ years ago A9o or J9s was a great shove PF because the platform was not rigged? Nowadays the platform is clearly rigged, when people are calling with better hands and still winning after 5 community cards are dealt?

@SCOBYI think I've played on Unibet only just over a year or so. And very little of volume. And yes, I play on multiple sites, some more some less. I don't see how it has any impact on this? Those two hands you probably shoved PF? You got lucky on flop and turn and got unlucky twice on river. You think that that's never happened on live poker? Or different online sites? Well, that's deluded. E. "I do not calculate percentages, because they seem useless to me, when the tower or the river can change everything in this game. Edited June 29 by SCOBY" Did you forget what you wrote yourself last week. River can change it all. And when it does, you come here if it's against you?

@JocoNo, I didn't miss the point. This is how every site I know does it. When a bet can't go right, it's a loss. Yes, there's a huge house edge on these situations added with their % of expected value with odds. But still, they take the risk by offering you the chamce to win money and you take the risk by betting on those odds and with those T&C they've made.

@SCOBY What is online poker than if not part of reality and real life? I pretty sure that every possible outcome of this game has happened also in live poker. Maybe not as many times but has happened. There's also multiple ways to play this game. Some sites even offer a game which would suit you more than regular tournament poker. It's called "Push or Fold". It requires very little of studying and a bit bigger bankroll. But you should try it out.

@FreedoM Loosing 30-70 and 46-54 PF hands vs. winning 16-84 PF hand. Which situation do you remember the next day? I think this is a one man war which has no place for any kind of rationality.

@ConmanOf course it's fair. When a bet can't go right anymore It's a loss. If the outcome is still a question, it should always be voided IMO. This is not the case in all situation which is kind of stupid, but it can all be found before betting in T&C so it really doesn't matter is it fair or unfair. You're taking the risk when making a bet.

The keeper definitely is world class. Penalty generates 0,76 xG, but with this guy it's way less.

@Andy-UnibetThanks. This explains it all. Now I think I got it.

@Purps@Andy-Unibet I still don't get it. Is this "You earn bonus points directly as you play" something that's not shown on the progress bar or is it included? I'm trying to count this out in so many different ways but can't just get a crip of it.

Should we talk about Italy-Spain? They've faced each others 22 times. Only once has the team marked as a away team won. It was Spain in Olympic Games and the year was 1920.

I feel like those odds are based more on the fact that England has basically had no troubles on their defence. Germany had two good scoring chances. That's about it. And now when Kane has got the ball in the net in last two games there's nothing to really be worried about in England. Getting the home ground boost and being the only team who haven't lost a single match on xG makes those odds reasonable to me.

@Stubbe-UnibetDid you travel to London? I just read that everyone without UK residence travelling to UK needs to take a mandatory 10 day quarantine. So not many Danish fans at Wembley.

@stefee1Your "everywhere" is hugely exaggerated. I'd say it's about 50-50 with MGA-licensed companies. Some Void others Settles bets like this. No scamming going on here. Even I was wondering when this happened to me first time, why does any site do it this way. But knowing that, you can also try to take a advantage of this rule.

@GR1ZZL3R I wouldn't be surprised if tsjk shoved the turn there. Only in satellites 🤣

@GR1ZZL3RThat seems like a decent value you got. I don't think that there's any way to play that hand and be satisfied if there's no maniac on the table.