CuteRaven

Still grinding and complaining about hands, great to see! Has it been going well? Have you started building a mountaintop monastery with poker winnings yet?

So it's been a long loooong looooooooooong break. Back in late 2020 I went on a big downswing, and lost all motivation for poker. I then withdrew the about 2500€ that I had left in my Unibet account. Nowadays I'm a relatively happy man, trying to enjoy the outdoors and beautiful summer weather when I can 🍃. All my anxiety (and related) issues are behind me, though I'm still looking for a proper direction in my life. Yesterday I deposited 60€ in my Unibet account. I tried a bunch of gamemodes: some HU SNG, some 5 handed SNG, some Banzai, and a bunch of tournaments. Mostly it was a lot of fun though I lost 40€ 🤣 (by far most of this was in tournaments). Bankroll is now at 19,89€. The exception was tournaments, I really didn't enjoy those. As somewhat of an adrenaline junkie who can't focus sitting down for that long, I don't have the patience for tournament gameplay. Also they suck your money out with all the rebuys and addons that are offered. I also learned back in late 2020 that I suck at cash games. The optimal strategy in cash games is generally lot more tight than SNGs because of rake (it's taken from pots instead of the buy-in). Big hands matter a lot in cash games, so you need to quite patient and careful with frequencies when playing cash games. In cash games one bad hand can cost you all the session profits, in a SNGs it will cost you one of many buy-ins. Also in SNGs you can compensate a lack of theoretical knowledge with a good reading ability (they are more short handed so you face the same players more) and in some cases a decent sense of ICM. With variable stack sizes (and sometimes variable ICM situations) it's impossible to memorize as much in SNGs and "feel players" probably fare better in them than cash games. Of course in SNGs theory and patience is still important, just as in any sort of poker game! There is still a lot to memorize (for example preflop). All of this is mostly a long way of saying that SNGs would still be my main game if I started playing poker more again. But I don't want to promise anything regarding poker at this point (or at any point), this hobby has always been mostly for my enjoyment, and if I stop having fun, there is no point in playing. If I start playing more again, I'll try to be a lot more careful with life balance, instead of burning myself out with my hobbies like I sometimes do. At the moment I'm really rusty, but not quite as rusty as I expected to be. Looks like some things have changed on Unibet also. My favorite new feature are the emojis, good fun for a fun player like me 🤩. Also I didn't see a way to replay the previous hand (in the browser version). Am I blind or was the feature removed? The tournament interface was improved too. Any other cool new features or events that I've missed? Also some of the people around back in 2020 are still around (and some new ones too ofc). Cool to see, people have been keeping up the grind💪! Hopefully y'all are enjoying your summer (or winter for the two people who live in the southern hemisphere)!

Interesting blog, you play the same gametypes that I enjoy too :D. Good luck with the poker and especially the life goals! Do you have plans in place for how you will prevent yourself from playing too high stakes (I have just noticed that sometimes it's easy to tell yourself to change a habit but if you don't have a plan in place for how to do it, it can be easy to fail). Hopefully Unibet will add some sort of option for a stakes limit in the settings so that people don't need to worry about it in the future!

I haven't played that much poker recently, but I have played a bit sporadically. I have mostly been focusing on other stuff. The times thaqt I have played I have usually still been running breakevenish or bad. In particular, I had a short 10€ Hexapro session where I lost 200€ (I saw probably about 4 or 5 qauds in all in situations that session and none of them were to my favour 🤣). Today I decided to play the Community poker league tournamnets though and I was lucky enough to come third in one of them for about 80€! My bankroll is now 2679.34 € I also decided to try out playing another site where they recently released SNGs, I'm trying to build a bit of a bankroll there starting from the microstakes. I don't really like their SNG software much but they do have pretty nice promotions and rakeback for cash games at least. Anyway, that's not Unibet so maybe I should't talk about it too much on this platform :P As for my sleep schedule, I have actually been able to improve it a bit! These are the things I have changed: - Me and some of my friends who also have sleep schedule issues go for a morning walk and eat at the student canteen together around the time when it opens. Seeing the morning sunshine and having something specific to wake up for is useful -In the evenings a few hours before sleep I switch off ALL the lights off so that it's completely dark. I have noticed that even a small lamp in the corner of the room can prevent me from getting tired. For the electronics that I use I have one of those blue light filters (or red screens/night lights) on at a high or maximum setting. This can even make it a bit hard to see the screen but I think it's worth it. The blue screens of electronics keep you up. I'm still not perfect with the sleep. Mainly I'm not that great at keeping track of time and planning ahead (for example I should probably be sleeping by now :P), but it has been an improvement. In case people are interested in the night lights: For Andoid the app I use is "Red Moon" at max settings (installed from F-Droid https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.jmstudios.redmoon/) but the app "Twilight" works well too https://twilight.urbandroid.org/. Often I have the inbuilt night light on at the same time because some of the bright icons in the notification panel are not affected by these apps. If you belong to the Linux master race, you can use "Redshift" http://jonls.dk/redshift/ It works well from the terminal. I usually use this command (replace X and Y withyour rough longtitude and latitude so that it can calibrate with the suns cycles, or you can remove the "X:Y" if you want to use the automatic geolocation services. You can use "redshift -h" to view what different commands do): redshift -b 1.0:0.25 -t 6500k:1000k -l X:Y -v -rFor Windows I use "F.lux" https://justgetflux.com/. You can go to the settings of the app and enable a broader range of color temperatures. I usually have it at max settings.

Good luck and nice results so far! Looks like an interesting start to a blog. I think I remeber seeing your name somewhere on 2p2 as well? Yeah, tilt issues are common, I think everyone has them to some degree, with some people being more susceptible than others. I recently punted off 1600€ at NL 100 cash, and a few buyins of that loss was def from tilt :D. I think the main thing is to try and learn what triggers tilt and try and avoid those situations, or recognize when it is happening (easier said than done ofc). For me triggers for tilt are being tired, playing for too long, playing too many tables, and not doing enough excersize, etc. One interesting thing about poker IMO is that if you care about your results, it motivates you even more to live a somewhat healthy/balanced lifestyle (because you also get punished by tilting/playing worse if you slip up), so that you can feel more focused and rested at the tables.

Bankroll is now 2812.41€. Have been playing kind of sporadically since the last blog update. I had one 25€ HU SNG session when I ran terribly and lost probably 70-80% of my all ins and getting coolered, dropping about 10 buyins. In another 25€ HU SNG session I ran great, making big hands and won about 10 buyins in a short session. Other than that I feel like I have been runnign pretty average, and playing quite well IMO, slowly winning some of that bankroll back (I have played some 10€ Hexa, 50 € HU SNG, and 25€ 5 man SNG in addition to the 25€ HU SNG)! I have also been playing with the same alias for the whole week. I think that is mostly not a good idea, but sometimes it's advantageous that your opponenets have some memories about how you play. For example, if some reg plays one or two SNG vs me and sees me make a ridiculous looking bluff in a situation where they would not expect most players to bluff, they might think I'm a maniac and call me the next 5 times that I take a similar line with value hands. And sometimes I can tell when someone who I know to be a reg (or who seems to be a reg) is playing this way, and I can counteradjust. I think I will change the alias again soon though. My sleep schedule has gotten really bad recently. It's hard to control as a student during covid, who has never been great with consitency/discipline anyway! I really want to try and fix this, especially when it's getting dark outside sooner every day. I'm trying some new things, like switching lights off a few hours before I plan to sleep and setting screen color temperature and brightness really, really low (to the point where it's almost hard to see it and barely usable :p), maybe I'll go for evening walks too. I'm also going to try and convince some friends (some of who have even bigger issues with controlling sleep schedules) to go on morning walks semi-consistently, it's easier to stay motivated for this if you aren't doing it alone (it's one thing to set an alarm clock, it's much harder to resist the temptation to not switch it off and continue sleeping when it actually rings :D). Probably should cut out the evening cup of tea also.

So what happened here, or what is @yeandama claiming? @yeandama opened an account and played with their flatmates from the same account? Or they opened separate accounts and played from the same flat without helping each other during play? "In April of this year we opened an account and start testing the hexapros." We opened an account "We started to play, validated the accounts and it was alright." validated the accounts Which one is it? Having same account for many people to use is against the rules on probably every poker site.

@JohnTokio To answer you question in Mprox SNG challenge blog about how to get Hexapro data: You can use this to get detailed results/data https://www.unibetcommunity.com/t5/General-Poker/Thread-for-Poker-Results/m-p/226711#M37656 . It's possible to make a script to parse through the data to calculate the stats you want or create charts (I did that when I got my own results). Or you can have a spreadsheet open while playing and add the info there (There is not much data to add if you think about it. If you play the same stakes during a session, all you need to add is multiplier and finish position and you can calculate the rest in the spreadsheet). You can go to account -> poker history and count your scores/buyins there manually after the session, though it's quite tedious. Many options :D

@Petit_pertotalYou mean this? https://www.pokernews.com/news/promotions/2020/10/win-a-share-of-2-000-every-week-by-playing-rake-free-unibet-38076.htm It already happened. The promotion ended on Sunday, then the 50€ and 100€ SNGs were removed. The rake on the remaining levels is now as it used to be (5%).

Tough year. Still not that bad considering you started from 30€, and you have a clear way forward now with the ICM studying and the course. Lets hope next year is more profitable. Enjoy your time off :D!

Lol that 25s hand calling a 4bet, made me laugh. Sometimes the hands that fish show up with are pretty funny. I guess it's good that they win sometimes, though it never feels nice when it happens vs you.

The downswing is in full force now, I can't stop the momentum of it :haha:. Bankroll is now 2604.14 €. Most of my losses came yesterday, I played a 5 man SNG session while they were still rake free. Mostly played the 50€ SNGs (on the last day that they existed :p), and lost 12 buyins. I only played maybe about 15 of them but just could not win any all ins, came second twice if I remeber correctly and didn't win any. I guess it's pretty standard variance 🤣. Then I played a bit more HU and Hexapro, ran bad there too. Today I played the 25€ HU SNG, and ran quite badly initially, with the bankroll reaching about 2400€, but was able to recover a bit. After that I played some 10€ Hexapro and broke even. At least today was breakeven and not a losing day :p This downsiwng made me think about when and how often I want to withdraw money. I think I will do something like the following every month: If my bankroll is below 2000€, don't withdraw anything. If bankroll is above 2000€, withdraw everything above 2000€ (but a maximum of 1000€) If bankroll is above 4000€ withdraw 1250€ If bankroll is above 6000€ withdraw 1500€ If bankroll is above 8000€ withdraw 1750€ and so on...it's kind of useless to think about it further since there is a good chance that my bankroll will never even reach above 6000€ (and first I preferably would need to stop this downswing :p), but this way I can get money from poker on a regular basis without removing the whole bankroll, so I still give myself a chance to move up in stakes.

"From a Fun Perspective I think all MTTs should be PKO and 75% of them being NHLE an the other 25% being PLO" I like this idea from @FreedoM Also, I would prefer 1€, 5€ and 25€ (5€ and 10€ feel quite similar and I would prefer 25€ over 10€). Maybe I am one of the only ones who has this preference. 1€, 5€, 10€ is still ok.

GL GL! Pretty cool that you are streaming too :D

@P0kerM0nk Yeah TAG isn't that nitty, but optimal raked cash ranges are still quite different from optimal SNG (or other zero rake ranges) ranges (and well, that's not even taking ICM into consideration yet :p) Just to emphasize the difference that rake makes for anyone who might be interested, you can compare the difference between the preflop ranges that Pluribus and PokerSnowie. They are both poker bots that learned poker by playing versus themselves. The difference is that Pokersnowie played in a raked enviroment where as Pluribus played in a zero rake environment. Unfortunately it does not say how much the rake was for Pokersnowie but I would guess it's close enough to the pretty standard micros net rake of about 4.5%. Here is some info on Pluribus ranges (if you look at the "detailed frequencies" table): https://pluribus-poker-BANANA.com/2019/08/05/pluribus-poker-preflop-defense-detailed/ I can't post the proper Pluribus link because: "The message body contains BANANA, which is not permitted in this community. Please remove this content before sending your post. We don't allow posts in other languages than English, and swearing is not allowed either." Replace "BANANA" in the link with "ali" (without the "l" between the letters "a" and "i") to get the link to work.Here is the Pokersnowie "preflop advisor": https://www.pokersnowie.com/pftapp/index.html If you look at SB vs BU RFI, Pluribus calls about 14% and 3bets about 11% for a total defend op about 25%. Poker Snowie on the other hand almost only 3bets, with a total defend of about 18%. If you look at BU vs CO RFI, Pluribus calls 11% and 3bets about 7% for a total defend of about 18%. PokerSnowie on the other hand 3bets about 9% and calls only about 4% for a total defend of about 11%. Even opening ranges change, if for example BU RFI is compared (Pluribus opens all suited Qx and down to J4s, K8o, T8o for example) https://pluribus-poker-BANANA.com/category/strategy/rfi/ Once again, replace the "BANANA" with "ali" (without the "l" between the letters "a" and "i")I have been used to playing closer to those zero rake ranges, and didn't realize how far from optimal I was playing preflop in cash, and how much more money I have probably been losing for this reason, calling too much IP and in the SB :Haha:.

@Dennis__ There was one reg that was quite exploitable during the first 2 weeks that I played. There were worse players in the pool, but this player was easy to identify. They were easy to run over with flop checkraises, or with OOP floats and then river bets when they checked turn (or lines like this). They overly cbet flops and overly gave up turns. To their credit though, they eventually made some decent adjustments on week 2 after a few too many checkraises from me and HU matchups where they got destroyed. Anyway, I'm not a 5 man SNG expert and am not sure if this is who @monkeyheaven is talking about.

Nice results, staying at breakeven even when you ran bad (even if Double trouble did help you a bit)!

@P0kerM0nkI don't normally play that long, usually I also play between 2-4 hours :) . I thought that with some courses ending and the extra free time plus the flop race promo, I wanted to try and play some volume. Playing 8 hours was a mistake. I also usually play that long only if I'm chasing losses, or on the rare caffeine fueled all nighter sunrun, or if I'm trying to push myself to play more volume. Cash games also really punish tilt because the losses are uncapped :p One thing that I also didn't consider enough was that the rake has a huge effect on both preflop and post flop strategy. Spots that are marginally profitable in situations where individual hands have zero rake (like SNG) are often really unprofitable in a cash game. It has a huge effect on preflop ranges, and high rake does things like make SB and many other spots (e.g CO vs UTG open) pretty clear 3bet or fold, and makes calling preflop (and postflop) a lot worse (I understand now why TAG is considered gospel at cash games). I had heard about it before but didn't really appreciate the scale of it before. The 100 NL rake really is crushing at the games :p, winning at a winrate of about 10 BB/100 from each player. It's a bit absurd when people talk about 8 BB/100 being a great 100 NL winrate, when without rake they would be winning at 18 BB/100 (rake takes away over half even from some of the best players!). Is 400 NL (where the rake takes 5 BB/100) more beatable than 100 NL given rake? I'm not sure. Anyway, it makes me prefer SNGs a bit more even, playing tight is not as much fun :p People often talk about Lottery SNG rake (which also takes away slightly over half of the winnings from the best players) being absurdly high (which I can agree with), but cash game rake seems rarely talked about in comparison. I guess in cash games edges are big compared to variance, so poker rooms can get away with it while some players still earn quite comfortably. Edit: Although maybe rakeback is better for cash games than other formats, or maybe not? I have no idea. Of course some spots might become more profitable if rakeback is factored in to the pot odds :p

@Dennis__ Interesting! It's pretty fun how evidence of different play styles can show up somewhat quickly in the position distribution. I think with the sample that I have the rough position distribution is much more reliable info than anything about my winrate (after all, a winrate can change drastically with two or three more/less wins). Edit: Also it's quite hard to finish 5th if you play tight while stacks are deep so a small amount of 5th place finishes makes a lot of sense if there are are some fish or more aggro players in the SNG that will often take that position

Great results, well done!

Bankroll is now 3318.18€. Yep, that means that I have recently had a pretty bad downswing 🤣. The culprit is NL 100 that I played earlier this week (Monday, Tuesday). Some of it was definitely runbad/rust, but also some of it was really bad tilt on Tuesday towards the end of an 8 hour session. I decided to take a break after Tuesday to reflect on how I ended up in playing with such bad tilt, and to spend some time also doing other stuff. Part of it is the nature of cash games. Unlike in SNG, which I have mostly played, you don't get a "natural break" unless you decide to have one (but in SNG every time an SNG ends, I often make decisions on weather I want a break or not). Therefore, in cash games you need to have the routine or presence of mind to take regular breaks while playing. Another part of it was playing too many tables. Towards the end of the session the amount of players on the tables started getting smaller, and it started being harder to keep up with the pace. But I didn't close tables at that point and instead kept playing on all tables, because I was kind of exited to play short handed. That coincided with some bad beats and then the tilt started. When you play too fast you play on instinct. You don't have time to reevaluate your decisions or mental state, or to keep your emotions at bay. I feel like playing a good amount of tables is almost more important in cash than other formats, because you are regularly in difficult deep pots in strategic situations that are rare, and the decisions get quite complex. In such a situation thinkiong the hand through and taking reads into account gets quite important. And finally, my mental game was bad, I had been playing for almost 8 hours with minimal breaks, my brain was feeling a bit fried from the long session of six tabling. I had also been spending too much time working on poker and other stuff in those recent days and not excersizing and sleeping enough. It started as a challenge for myself to play some volume at cash, but I'm probably going to play some other formats next time. I also sometimes don't like playing cash as much because it feels like you aren't "getting stuff done" (it feels more like a grind than SNG in some weird way, it never really "ends"). Although cash games are interesting in other ways. I might return to cash later, if I return I will do some things differently: -Play maybe 4-5 tables instead of 6 to get better reads and be more focused and therefore increase EV a lot (although I think I could just make more 2-3 tabling HU SNG compared to 4-5 tables of cash) -Take timed breaks every hour -Play shorter session, maybe max 4 hours -Keep better track of mental game Also I didn't realize how huge cash game rake really is (more of that in my results)! In the end it's not too bad, I have lost almost half my roll before, and recovered. Results Recently I got my results for the past 12 months or so from Unibet. I made a Python script that calculated some data from the results and made graphs (if you want to use the script let me know, the code is ugly and hastily made, but it works :p). I posted some of the bigger sample size or otherwise more relevant results here below (though the samples aren't huge by any means). Some of the more interesting stuff for me was: -From the sample it looks like I have about 4% ROI at the HU SNG so far for most stakes, which I'm pretty happy with (OBV sample is not big) -In the 5 man SNG I have the most first and last place finishes, probably because of the aggro style that I played with. I wonder how different it would look for other peoples results :p -With the current ITM% it seems like I could be profitable playing Hexas, though it's a huge variancefest rollercoaster and the profit potential doesn't seem huge. I'm happy with the results given the fact that the blind levels are so short on average. Of course sample siza is still small. -I got rekt in cash games, maybe I should stay away from them but I don't like giving up :p. Also, I'm surprised at how huge the rake is at NL 100 for example, I didn't expect that. About 1 buyin of rake every 1000 hands seems a bit insane. I couldn't be bothered to add the rake into the SNG results because it would have taken a bit more code to do it, but I payed 2086€ rake at the SNGs (pretty much all from HU) Also in the data I was sent, I found a few lines of some very weird Hexapro data. The lines had buyins and prize pools that did not match. For example, there was some 25€ buyin Hexa with 1.50€ prize pool. Most of the data seems accurate though, gonna ask about how the weird data got into my results file :p. All SNG 2 seat Amount played= 3670 Average buyin= 18.27€ Profit= 2783.64€ ROI= 4.15% In the money= 53.76% Place 1 finishes: 1973 Place 2 finishes: 1697 All SNG 5 seat Amount played= 432 Average buyin= 32.64€ Profit= 413.86€ ROI= 2.93% In the money= 40.74% Place 1 finishes: 100 Place 2 finishes: 76 Place 3 finishes: 78 Place 4 finishes: 77 Place 5 finishes: 101 10.00€ SNG 2 seat Amount played= 1189 Profit= 370.80€ ROI= 3.11% In the money= 53.15% Place 1 finishes: 632 Place 2 finishes: 557 25.00€ SNG 2 seat Amount played= 1416 Profit= 1460.00€ ROI= 4.12% In the money= 53.67% Place 1 finishes: 760 Place 2 finishes: 656 50.00€ SNG 2 seat Amount played= 292 Profit= 726.00€ ROI= 4.97% In the money= 54.10% Place 1 finishes: 158 Place 2 finishes: 134 All non-Banzai Hexapros Amount played= 1604 Average buyin= 12.08€ Profit= 989.00€ ROI= 5.10% In the money= 37.28% Place 1 finishes: 598 Place 2 finishes: 544 Place 3 finishes: 462 10.00€ non-Banzai Hexapros Amount played= 829 Profit= 1095.00€ ROI= 13.14% In the money= 37.09% Practical rake given the prize pools (vs 6.853% in theory)= -7.60% Place 1 finishes: 309 Place 2 finishes: 292 Place 3 finishes: 232 You had 388 1.5x multipliers and won 161 of them. You had 219 3x multipliers and won 77 of them. You had 154 5x multipliers and won 52 of them. You had 68 10x multipliers and won 21 of them. Traditional NLHE cash games all stakes Hands played= 49794 Average stakes= 30.47€ Profit= -1471.50€ Rake payed= 1646.22€ Profit before rake= 174.72€ Winrate BB/100 hands= -9.69 Traditional NLHE cash games 100€ Hands played= 12137 Profit= -1648.69€ Rake payed= 1326.19€ Profit before rake= -322.50€ Winrate BB/100 hands= -13.58

@Dara Fair enough! And yeah, I don't believe that there was anything malicious going on here either way, just added my 2 cents to try and figure the hand out, because probably the hand looks quite weird to most people and therefore I think getting more concrete/technical benefits the discussion and the easing of suspicions here for people 😃. Yeah you for sure know ICM much much better than me then, I have played around a bit in ICMIzer and seen that in some extreme bubble spots, the "bubble factor" value dictates that you need about 70% or 75% equity to get it in, but rarely more. Probably getting raised happens rarely though, but maybe it is significant enough to decrease the EV of betting a lot, and you know the reads/player dynamic there anyway. Much closer spot than I initially thought then.

Of course now there is more time to analyze these hands now than in real time, but I will attempt some analysis on the first hand. Apparently Lappin can have 44 here (3 combos), but probably also the following hands in the potential river calling/raising range: - 99 (3 combos), A9 (12 combos), K9 (12 combos), Q9s (of which you block 1 combo=2 combos), J9s (3 combos), T9s (of which you block 1 combo=1 combo), 98s (3 combos), 97s (3 combos), 65s (3 combos), 67s (3 combos), A6 (12 combos), K6s (3 combos) JT (4 combo), QT (3 combos), KT (4 combos), AT (4 combos), A4s (3 combos), 54s(3 combos), K4s(3 combos), pocket pairs JJ-AA (24 combos) By hand category this is: Tx or better: 22 combos JJ-AA: 24 combos 9x: 36 combos 6x: 21 combos 4x: 9 combos Maybe some hands would often raise pre (like AT, A9s, A4s, 99, JJ-AA), some might bet turn (e.g Tx and AA-JJ) and some might not cbet flop (e.g 6x). Removing some of the combos in these hand categories leaves: Tx or better: 10 combos (removed 2 AT combos and then combos halved) JJ-AA: 6 combos (combos halved twice) 9x: 30 combos (removed six A9 combos) 6x: 10 combos (combos roughly halved) 4x: 5 combos (removed a few combos of A4s and a few more incase 4x checks flop) So we are left with 53 combos that you beat (including 2 combos of JT that are left), one or two QT that you chop with and about 6 or 7 combos that you lose to. This means that you beat/chop with about 85% of the potential continuing range when holding QT here. Would Lappin call all these hands against a moderate e.g 3/4 pot bet? Maybe not, but still a lot of hands to call with. Of course this analysis is highly speculative (I may have made math errors too, I counted combos in my head), I don't know the dynamic or ranges or play styles here, but on the surface checking back QT seems like a strategic error even with extreme ICM pressure. I'm not implying anything about player intentions, could be an honest strategic mistake, I'm just pointing out that the logic from @Dara on the first hand does not seem to make a ton of sense objectively. At worst you probably beat 70-75% of the continuing range, and you are still pretty deepstacked by the river. Edit: I'm not an ICM expert, so maybe there is a chance that you really need to beat about 75% range to bet??? IDK, I would be surprised though

Also you can add hands here http://www.pokerhandreplays.com/import.php Works for most NLHE hands at least. Remove the summary from the end, that sometimes messes up the hand. For example this is a hand I played from Unibet: http://www.pokerhandreplays.com/view.php/id/10180336 The hand replay is made using this input (notice I removed the summary section from the end, and also the thing about what place the players finished the tournament in just in case): Table €50 SNG 2 Seat - 15.00/30.00 - No Limit Hold'Em - Total prize €97 *** Seated players *** Seat 1: Villain (895) Seat 2: Hero (1105) *** Blinds and button *** Villain has the button Villain posts small blind 15 Hero posts big blind 30 *** Hole cards *** Dealt to Hero [5d 7d] Dealt to Villain [Qc 6c] *** Preflop *** Villain calls 15 Hero checks *** Flop *** [5h 3c 7c] Hero checks Villain checks *** Turn *** [5h 3c 7c] [Js] Hero bets 120 Villain calls 120 *** River *** [5h 3c 7c] [Js] [Qh] Hero bets 955, and is all-in Villain calls 745, and is all-in Uncalled bet returned to Hero: 210 *** Showdown *** Villain shows [Qc 6c], A Pair of Queens Hero shows [5d 7d], Two pairs, Sevens up Hero wins 1790

For sharing hand histories of interesting hands (but it does not exist on broser client for some reason). It's a good function, but would be better in conjunction with a better search method (e.g searching by hand combo) where hands are easier to find IMO.