Jump to content

Community Big Win Casino Tournament - Week 3


RayL

Recommended Posts

@bebemic And all others, to make the payout considerably easier, I made a decision to change the prizes into bonus money, but adding a bit more to each position. It should smoothen up our payout process considerably - Bonuses will be credited shortly :)

Former Community Manager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 470
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'll tell you what, since I changed it in the middle of a promotion, you can let me know when it's 10% done at 2,5x and we'll release the bonus money manually - is that fair in combination with the added prize money?

Former Community Manager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Told you jeppe, i will be happy when i had the money , but,..... again you changed the rules ....and .... NO MONEY, only bonus.How can I be happy when I 've played for  a prize , but the prize is gone. I have to wager 6250 euro to withdraw. I was happy cause i have money to play UOS , but now ..... Just NO COMMENT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@JeppeLwrote:

@bebemic And all others, to make the payout considerably easier, I made a decision to change the prizes into bonus money, but adding a bit more to each position. It should smoothen up our payout process considerably - Bonuses will be credited shortly :)


I'd rather wait longer than have it as bonus money. This is a "one step forward two steps back" type of decision and honestly i'm doubtful that the intentions behind it are really sincere and don't lay elsewhere. If anything we should atleast get cash prizes for the time that's already been waited and the currently running tournament wich already had established rules for their duration - those should be honored first before any future changes are made - but preferably we players should still have the choice to opt for waiting longer if that is what we want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Nospheratu Fair point and I see where you're coming from, but do you think the alternative I made with the 10% wagering requirement doesn't balance it out?

My intentions are actually all good, because @RayL and I have the authority to credit bonuses within our budget without secondary approval, it brings about a good feeling internally within the team - indipendence - and I believe that's good for morale :) Secondly, doing cash prizes puts other people to work, and it seems unnecessary when we have the bonuses setup and ready to go. It's a better solution for the long run though I wish I would've made it earlier.

/Jeppe

Former Community Manager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@JeppeL @RayL

That was no joy there....verry bad experiance...anyway maybe\should change this to:

1: Prize monney in walue of freespins with no turnover requirement.

2: Make player choose to wait for free real monney or FBM.

Also make sure they get correct ammount ;)

Just my 2 cents....

Nothing is impossible, the impossible only take some time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


@JeppeLwrote:

@Nospheratu Fair point and I see where you're coming from, but do you think the alternative I made with the 10% wagering requirement doesn't balance it out?

My intentions are actually all good, because @RayL and I have the authority to credit bonuses within our budget without secondary approval, it brings about a good feeling internally within the team - indipendence - and I believe that's good for morale :) Secondly, doing cash prizes puts other people to work, and it seems unnecessary when we have the bonuses setup and ready to go. It's a better solution for the long run though I wish I would've made it earlier.

/Jeppe


It's better but i still think a tournament that's 1 1/2 days from ending should honor the structure that was set... it just looks bad.

The intentions good or not still decrease the prizes value. That is the main point here. An added 50€ don't make up for an added 25X turnover - especially for those at 3rd, 4th and 5th place that are even more likely to see their prize strongly decimated after the turnover is completed.

If you guys are able to make the call i think you should make it for the players and revert things to the way they used to be. After all Unibet goes by the motto by players for players, right? You mention it puts other people at "unnecessary" work, something that implies that this is something unimportant and as such the players might aswell be at the recieving end in getting shorthanded. I would argue that it's work no different than any other and should definitely not be viewed as some kind of added burden.

I'm not happy that you consider it a "better solution" for people at their job not having to do lesser/consuming tasks at the expense of it's customers but everyone can think what they want. Just pointing out that it's in poor taste and looks bad.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@testuser1 wrote:

@Nospheratuwrote:

@testuser1wrote:

@pittpittnice one :)

 

@Nospheratu, where're you from?


From Sweden


That's weird. There're no licensing issues or similar, that could explain this, when it's on the Swedish site. Maybe someone ticked the wrong box somewhere :D Sure @RayL can look into this for you.

An idea for a future tournament. @JeppeL and @RayL you could make an Yggdrasil week and have a criteria saying the brag must be posted, for the spin to be eligible - the brag feature is essentially an easy way to share a replay of the spin on social media. Imo video content is better than a picture, and it'll also make the tournament a bit different, as you can't just start 1000 auto spins and have it automatically stop when there's a big win - you'll need to pay attention. https://www.unibetcommunity.com/t5/Casino-Live-Casino/Meet-the-supplier-Yggdrasil/m-p/76713#M1866 

 


Love this idea as well as @Livertool, but might change it into something slightly different :)

Former Community Manager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...