GotKot99

Oh, and aside from losing at poker tables, I have a very limited and special skill set here in the Community:

Copy-pasting live chat link to folks & turning on-topics into off-topics.

@mugmaster200 don’t ask me. I know nothing of playing poker other than how to lose a hand 

Hi @RussUni,

Have you tried contacting Unibet customer service live chat yet (here: https://unibet-int.custhelp.com/app/chat/chat_launch)? It is open 24/7 in English, and they should be able to handle this.

I was playing earlier today some ordinary cash games and then decided to switch into Banzai. The switch to the new Banzai was so huge. I was having much more fun there than in normal cash game table. Not saying there is anything wrong with the normal cash game, it is just that new Banzai feels so fun to play with! I really believe, there is great potential in Banzai 2.0 👍

I was also about to post a screenshot of my first ever level 4 Loyalty System achievement. But when I saw this 👇 in another thread by @maciaseczek, I’m not gonna even bother 🙃

And couple of quick name suggestions for Banzai if needed:

Jason StackHam (Jason Statham)

Lucky Fluke (Lucky Luke)

Thor Flop In Soon (Thor Odinson)

Ebany KO Bomber (Ebanie Bridges)

I think @psrquack’s post regarding the avatar resemblance to Stalin simply highlights what I have been saying all along. We as human beings are different, with differing life experiences and worldviews, and these have implications on what we view offensive/inoffensive, morally right/wrong etc.

This is just how we are as human beings, and we can’t run away from it. 

Furthermore, I am not suggesting that certain avatars or aliases would have to be automatically removed or revamped. I was simply stating that what is offensive to one is not necessarily offensive to another. Hence, it is not a clear cut thing.

To reiterate myself once more, I can live with the current rules; I have no beef with the current situation whatsoever in general. I only suggested, there could be some set of rules, but the situation seems manageable without them. Individual offensive aliases etc. can be solved individually.

I rest my case, because it was really only my own reflections about the complexity of the issue to begin with. If someone wants to continue the discussion, I’m up for some academic debate, but the best avenue for that might not be here 😉

Thank you guys 🧑‍🎄

P.S. I don’t consider myself as a proponent of wokeism by any standard.

8 minutes ago, Livertool said:

25k raffle b-day raffle.

This is pretty interesting again from t&c pov. Nowhere it says that you get 1 ticket for every 5€ you wager but only that you have to wager 5€ in month to get ticket.

But email received today says you get ticket everytime that you wager 5€

 

I’m also somewhat confused. And I’m not sure if I even have received the notification every month, although the €5 wager has been met.

I also got the same email as @Livertool.

10 minutes ago, Livertool said:

Lunasta arpalippusi nyt

What’s with the above “Claim your raffle ticket now”? Is there a mention of claiming one’s raffle ticket in the T&Cs? (Or is this some translation error 🤔)

There is a clause that the winner has to claim the prize (if won) within 25 hours on December 25th from the moment the bonus is added. But there is nothing on some raffle ticket claiming. Or am I missing something here?

1 hour ago, Andy-Unibet said:

If you think there is a >1% chance it'll be deemed unacceptable, don't create that alias. It's a pretty clear line. There are millions and millions of number, letter and symbol combinations that are not going to offend anyone, just choose those. 

Nobody is accidentally creating offensive aliases.

I think the logic given 👆 will suffice within this context. I’m also thinking likewise, that at least the vast majority of people will not create offensive aliases by accident (strictly speaking, “nodoby” maybe too strong a word to use - but let’s not go too philosophical here 😄).

However I would argue, since we have different worldviews and values, the concept of “offensive alias” is not so black and white (and this will not contradict moral absolutism - but again - that is another discussion 😄). I’ll take one practical example: There are a lot of poker aliases with respect to different kinds of sexual behaviour/inclinations. To some they are not at all offensive, but rather funny. But to others they are offensive, by the very virtue of their more traditional sexual ethics, for example.

Summa summarum: I think most of the offensive alias cases are clear. But there are still many aliases that are not so clear in terms of offensive/inoffensive. The moral judgment of the aliases (in general) depend upon our worldviews and the core values we have. And as we live in a pluralistic world, we will have disagreements over what is wrong and what is right. But as I have already said, I think the practical logic outlined above is most likely sufficient for the intents and purposes. These other points are simply my personal more philosophical ramblings.

Thank you 🙂

Hi guys,

(WARNING - YOU ARE ABOUT TO ENTER INTO A VERY BORING MESSAGE 🤦‍♂️😴)

I think it was only yesterday that I first started to look this whole topic. Very interesting and important too.

In my opinion, truly offensive nicknames shouldn’t be allowed. At the same time, it is sometimes hard to draw a clear line between acceptable and unacceptable. This is true especially when we live in times when it seems that being offended by almost everything is considered little short of mandatory (speaking in general terms here; not referring to anyone of you).

I myself am a moral absolutist which in ethics/moral philosophy and in short means that there are certain moral principles that are universal. Hence, we can have categories of wrong and right. Okay, not interesting - bla, bla, bla…

In practical terms, what I’m getting at is the following: do we have some sort of ground rules set for (morally) acceptable nicknames? This might help to solve the problem. It can also create problems, if the rules become too limiting. Lastly, as I mentioned earlier, there will probably always be cases that could be considered debatable (I.e., how some nickname is to be interpreted; what is the original intent of the nickname; have the creator of the nickname even understood what some nickname means etc.)

In summary: (1) There are clear cases of nicknames that are morally offensive and unacceptable, and hence should be removed. (2) In all probability there are nicknames that might be interpreted to be morally wrong, but necessarily are not. (3) Some ground rules concerning the nicknames could be establish to alleviate the situation (but it can also cause some problems of its own too).

Have a nice day - signed by Judge GotKot

😎😉

@Ellamace,

Just trying to help what I can. I don’t work for Unibet, so cannot really help much. But I’m sure Jami-Unibet and other Unibet staff will help you.

While I understand your frustration, I’m also certain your case will be solved if everything is on check! Just try to hang in there.

My best wishes 🙂

On 12/19/2022 at 6:26 PM, GR1ZZL3R said:

Wow! Congrats mate!

🎁

30 minutes ago, FreedoM said:

Nice surprise after Log-in! 🎄

Congrats mate! 
 

Imagine what this would be like for me - you know - everything in slow motion

Congrats to the winners!
 

I have no reactions left (in the Community or in real life) anymore!

@Livertool, when do we meet? 

1 minute ago, Livertool said:

Yes, i won 🤌

  Reveal hidden contents

Nothing 

 

I didn’t win either!

Yup, Thanks guys! 
 

I’m out of reactions 😆

16 minutes ago, Livertool said:

I guess i've lost last of my working brain cells then 🤯

Hopefully not - we are having a tough competition over that one 😆

And as I said, I’m not 💯 sure about the prizes, so…

1 minute ago, Livertool said:

My mind playing tricks on me or weren't all the prices poker points earlier? Besides poker packages ofc. Now 26-50 positions are mtt tickets 🤔

https://www.unibet.com/promotions/poker-promotions/team-collector#tab:tabview-7-1448305-tab-3

 

 

I’m not sure, but I think there were MTT Tickets or MTT Bundles earlier also.

Cannot wait to end up in position 51

23 minutes ago, GR1ZZL3R said:

And just to point out before we get hordes of players asking where the tourney is...

...it cannot be found by typing either Sensei or Masterclass in the search bar....

 

... nor under an Xmas Mission search but can be winkled out under the slightly more obscure  Black Belt Special. 😂

Maybe you could claim this one; some negotiations with dear Santa 🤔

Besides the hunting part, it has the monochrome gift characteristic to the Poker Client. Maybe it is something special

9 minutes ago, Andy-Unibet said:

Sensei and/or Black belt triggers it.

6 minutes ago, GR1ZZL3R said:

I'm wrong again. 😪

The T&C’s seem to mention only black belt but not Sensei as prerequisite for the ticket 🤔 (EDIT: Also the description text above)

5 hours ago, pomavera said:

I just requested a withdraw through bank transfer right now. How longs does it take to get processed and deposited into my account?

https://unibet-en.helpsite.cloud/results?query=Withdrawal

On 12/17/2022 at 10:13 PM, jerry said:

Business with missus or fight club meeting 😅😁

 

But will this mean, Santa is starting to gift Fight Club MTT Tickets from now on 🤔😉

For me showing

So I guess it’s OK

By the way: Wasn’t the requirement for having the ticket to receive the black belt? I received mine when on the brown belt? Is this right - or a bug of sorts 🤔? I was Sensei before reaching black belt for sometime, so don’t know if that has something to do with getting the ticket. Just wanted you to know, if something is off.

What say ye @Stubbe-Unibet and/or @Andy-Unibet?

P.S. Not wanting to cheat, I went on to get my black belt, so ticket earned by the books. Unfortunately lost some precious euros in the process, but hey it’s Christmas and have to do some elf-testing. 🧑‍🎄👍

7 minutes ago, Jami-Unibet said:

Still quite a few gifts hidden. In case Santa wasn't clear in his last post, this time there is 12 of them. 🙂

I've gone around and liked the ones who managed to claim them so far.

Since no update to the rules since yesterday, I assume we go with this principle

17 hours ago, Jami-Unibet said:

For now each member can only claim one gift. I will update here if that changes.

rather than

On 12/15/2022 at 8:22 PM, Jami-Unibet said:

If the gifts are hidden too well and not found for a day or more then this rule might change. 🙂

Just (double)checking out.

Thanks 🙂, and sorry for bothering!

2 hours ago, GR1ZZL3R said:

Unfortunately all these extra posts in this thread were not quite what I envisioned.

I’m standing with you here. Please, let’s not ruin GR1ZZL3R’s great Christmas-theme topic by unnecessary posts. (Okay, I am posting here too 🤦‍♂️). Maybe rather - and preferably - staying within the confines of likes etc. wouldn’t bloat the topic so much. Of course I think GR1ZZ won’t probably mind thoughtful posts/comments.

Santa’s gift hunting is also wholly another thing.

Have a nice day everyone! 

@GR1ZZL3R, 

As I already mentioned, I think this topic is a wonderful idea (thanks once again)! And since this is your playlist, I don’t know if my idea is fitting or not: I was wondering if we should ask Santa to reveal (one of) his favourite Christmas song(s), if he’s not to busy?

Just a thought. I’m out for tonight 😴

Hello @Rachid.aboula, and welcome to the Community! 🙂

From what I understand, it seems your verification documents have been sent 12/12, so it’s only 5-6 working days now. Since we’re close to Christmas there might be some additional delay still. Maybe your account is verified tomorrow…

@Jami-Unibet, are you able to help in anyway? Thank you!