FeelsBadMan

Favorites seem to work fine for me, but I only use them on one device. It used to have issues in the past, thought it got fixed. Strange games getting added? Never had that one, you sure that isn't the Kossu bug @Rushbie 😅

Hey @TheNotor1ous, actually won it in a community league many years ago 😁 , the prize was a custom avatar of anything I wanted, so I chose Pepe and got lucky that a really amazing designer/artist at unibet picked it up and made this masterpiece. Don't know if they still do promos like this cause it's a lot of work, but mine is not for sale 😅

That's great, but was mentioning such a feature so that the general population can see it too, to increase traffic. Won't matter much now anyway with 2s and 5s, they'll get traffic regardless, so it's fine.

I was mostly joking with the 100s, even though I would love it 😄 . Probably wouldn't have mentioned it if it wasn't a downgrade from the usual 10s that get a ton of players. Still a really cool promo even as is. I think you're really underestimating the number of games that would start with a 12k prizepool, it won't be just the 0 players in there already. The main issue would be making it clear when the big ones are, having in the promos window an actual schedule with times and stake for people to know to be online at that time (I would also have a few up next in the banner while we wait for the next to start), maybe have it on the website as well. The current system where there's just a number of certain stake jackpots in the entire period is really bad at getting players to be present especially within such short timeframes. Obviously it would be a bigger cost, I'm just shooting my shot, at not having a snore cup 😁

Why do the stakes have to be so low and boring? let's spice it up a bit, maybe some 10s, maybe some 25s, maybe some 100s 😅 It's the World Cup, not the Snore Cup 😴

IMO PKOs don't need the same level of survival imperative baked into them as normal tournaments, because that's how you end up with people getting into top 5 consistently with 0 or 1 bounties. They're missing the whole point of the tournament and a large part of the fun and EV, they're supposed to go for bounties and create action. Obviously you can't go too far in the opposite direction either like the 90% bounty tournaments where getting far is pointless, that's no longer a tournament, just flinging bounties at eachother. The current iteration has great incentives to both go for bounties and for late game survival which always have to be weighed against each other when deep, and that made for some really fun tournaments the past week, with some great final table dynamics. Also due to these being PKO's it would feel kinda crummy to be paid slightly above half the buyin for cashing as opposed to regular tournaments where at least you get more than you paid for it, so I think it would make sense to have a bit less people paid in PKOs, to have it be a bit more satisfying. A little bit more flat, sure, that can be reasonable (personally I've enjoyed them the way there are now), just not too much, which I assume is what you want too, only mentioning it because feedback has a habit to be applied to the extremes, like a few people asked for addons, Eeeeevrything became an addon, a few people wanted 6max, eeeverything became a 6max 😅

oh wow, I forgot about those types of table layouts that were all over the place back in the day, so ugly 🤮

A better color scheme for the multipliers in Hexapro Banzai would be great. In classic Hexapro, unibet is probably one of the best to easily differentiate on the table which multiplier you are currently playing. In Extreme however, most multipliers look the same, it's especially problematic on mobile. The red is also very attention grabbing, probably too attention grabbing to be used on 1x multipliers.

3x Extreme 125x's one of which was an Extreme 3'rd place , and with an Extreme 125x Badbeat 73.61% favorite

24 points at the 5€ stake 🤷‍♂️

averagely big stack 🤪

wow, you guys are nuts, would have taken me an extra 2 days just to get to 3 FTs (if I was still in the comp) by running crazy hot (in the shit buyins) and you both are already on 4, so sick ⚖️

Congrats @MaecTpo and @cameleonul , insanely tough competition 😅 On the rules change, this is a prime example why you should always vote kids, your vote matters, I was ambivalent on the old rule and tie breaker rule so 1 vote could have swayed it to whatever you wanted.

I don't mind the original rule of fastest poster, but I can see it getting messy. I kinda like the idea of a whole week deathmatch in the case of a same day tie breaker, 2 people fighting for their lives, for those 20 cent cashes in nano FTs the entire week 😁 obv with a 250€ consolation prize for whoever loses the tiebreaker 😜

2'nd Final table with the BAD BEAT style points lucky but also 0 lucky wombo combo

a tiny FT, infobox seems to be slow with the updates

85.66% of sadness and Trip Tens top hand for the most 0 lucky 🍀 baddest beat one can imagine

96.46% worth of sunday 0lucky

First submission to the 0 lucky club, top hand KKK44, not a screenshot cause the client doesn't know how to do replays:

Can confirm that he did win a 25€ ticket with the alias Pionrj ... Iany was just a bit distracted at the moment by chat and it slipped his mind to collect the alias 😄

one more

EDITED FOR PUBLIC SHAMING

Dark reader indeed looks pretty damn good

@Leo-Unibet You don't have to explain yourself to us, we're just giving feedback (even though one feedback was a bit aggressive and drunk 🤣 ) I like the 20 levels idea for day 1, indeed it's probably better to end far from the money and let it pop on day 2, that's mostly why we gave this feedback, not for the 2 people returning on day2, but more because of the unnecesarily long day 1 given the circumstances. And yeah I assumed it was because people complained about the bubble and their feedback focused more on lets just burst it already :D , understandable. As for having different setups for different buyins I understand where you're coming from, I have mixed feelings about this too, as low stakes players want to play good tournaments too, would definitly be against making them turbo, it just seems that the feedback is that thay're a bit too long for the very tiny prizes, and 10-12 for 1€ , 12-15 for 10€ with 15k chips still makes for a very well structured tournament compared to what else is available at their stakes (while very slow tournaments are more standard at the higher stakes), and it would also help making the total runtime more similar for the 4 tournaments despite the fact that the low ones have 3 to 4 times the entries, and then you can make custom day1/day2 splits where day 1 ends at the same-ish time, but the lower ones are further along. Just an idea, dunno what is better, completely up to you what you consider is better, it's not something that affects me as I don't play the 1 , and I don't mind the 10 lasting however long, just basing this on a few personal anecdotes I've heard and lack any real data on what people prefer. Overall I really liked these tournaments, quite enjoyable to play 👍

^ Just posting a short translation of the angry finnish message. We all probably agree that day 1 could have been shorter (less levels), ideally day 1 and day 2 would be roughly equal, so like for a 10 hour total runtime, 5 hour day 1 +5 hour day 2. This time the "new DSO" had half the stack size (great change IMO) and 2 extra levels of day 1, compared to the old DSO Personally, other than the weird day 1 day 2 split which seems like an honest mistake, and that doesn't really affect me, I quite enjoyed the structure. a bit too deep at the start but got past that by lateregging an hour in. Also it probably would make sense to have lower events a bit faster, like for the 1€ event, don't think almost anyone would complain if it were a 10 min day 1 12 min day 2, and for the 10€ maybe like 12min day 1 and 15 minute day 2. The prizes just aren't worth it for most, and these blind timers would still give a very good amount of play for the level of thournaments at those stakes, and it would make it easier to split day1s and day2s equally-ish across the board. I know I know, his angry message didn't seem like it said all this, but deep down it really did 🤣 @Leo-Unibet