Community

@MadAdo wrote: @Leo-Unibet  with getting more and more various HX mission tasks - how about getting alternative qualifiers to Sit&Go ? Structure for flips should be pretty the same/similar and there should be even 'regular' HexaPro qualifier tournaments once per a day/week/while ? What do you say - give it a go or forget/burried forever  Heyu @MadAdo  Do you mean something like these? ... View more

@Josafina wrote: In the schedule tab for the MTT player of the year promotion page it says that the Player of the Year Showdown Freerolls will be  played on Sunday the 10th, 2021. Was pretty bummed when I got my ticket this morning and it is scheduled for Wednesday the 6th. I'm in Canada and at work so unfortunately I'm unable to play that early on weekdays. Anyone have any info on why the dates got switched? Not expecting anything to happen, just  bummed about it. Anyway good luck to all of you playing! Josa. Hey Josa, There has been a miss in communication internaly, but you are right,. the tournament is according to the terms running 10th January, of course we have to change that, im sorry for the inconvinience. /Leo     ... View more

  This thread shows that we at Unibet has the best poker community ever, great supportive members, I wish you all a very nice 2021 and that you run excepional well at the tables. Thanks !             ... View more

@Pesek wrote: @Leo-Unibet wrote: @FunckyFish wrote: @Merenitsu wrote: @FunckyFish  i think this late regisration . I know about late reg, but it also says this: You only have 15 minutes to register before each tournament, so don't be late! Hello @FunckyFish , The text is meaning that there will only be 15 minutes late reg,. so hurry up regestering, don't wait for late registartion. I hope you  enjoy the freeroll!    You are wrong @Leo-Unibet  . In Polish version there is " Możesz zarejestrować się 15 minut przed turniejem – nie spóźnij się! " wchich means exactly "You can register 15 minutes before the tournament starts-don't be late". Hello @Pesek  It seams like there been some missunderstanding in translation. If someone had some bad experience with the advent freeroll I really say sorry from all of us to all of you./Leo      ... View more

@FunckyFish wrote: @Merenitsu wrote: @FunckyFish  i think this late regisration . I know about late reg, but it also says this: You only have 15 minutes to register before each tournament, so don't be late! Hello @FunckyFish , The text is meaning that there will only be 15 minutes late reg,. so hurry up regestering, don't wait for late registartion. I hope you  enjoy the freeroll!    ... View more

@Farseer wrote: Few thoughts (played all but 3 low/mid/high-events), though mainly my old points still stand from UOS8: https://www.unibetcommunity.com/t5/General-Poker/Unibet-Online-Series-8/m-p/331646#M49473 Weekly 2-day events seemed bad, too deep starting stacks, too long running time (especially at low levels compared to prize pools) and too long day1 (27 levels with breaks: 7h 27 min, ending 03:27 EET). Even just by cutting 2 levels from the start of regular events would help a bit with running time, make it bit more bearable 6h 51 min. Would probably cut even more or make day1 to run 12 min blind levels instead of 15 min (though rather take longer blind levels than deeper starting stacks). Using same 2-day structure for all events with different starting stacks and even with R/A isn't great imo. R/A should start with considerably more shallow stack, to provide action and make tournament finish ITM day1. Satellites stopped running bit too early, should run later especially on non-KO events imo. Usually last satellites did reach their guaranteeds better than early satellites. Sunday as starting day was a good change. Tuesday as rest day was better than Monday (2-day events could kill rest day). 3 weeks running time is too long. Especially with leaderboard prizes being less than what they used to be with 2-week long series with smaller buy-ins. Would've skipped this UOS if not for Pokerihuone separate additional leaderboard. Personally would like to see high events removed from overall leaderboard, as they cost so much and due to higher multiplier they're critical for overall leaderboard. There was also some slight problem with 5 events running at the same evening and often at the same time. Not sure how many players feel great playing so many tables, especially as occasionally there were formats like ante up which require much more concentration than regular tournament. @Leo-Unibet  Hello @Farseer  First of all, thanks for taking your time to share your thoughts regarding the latest series. Regarding the 2-day event I agree to some extent that the smaller buyins tournaments having the same structure as a €100 buyin are a bit too long. The idea is to have all structures the samr so it would not matter if you're a "highroller" playing the €100-300 events or if you are a nano player, you get the same good structure tournament. But as you say, probably the small ones are too long, I will think about it, already have but again give it a big thought. The higher 2-day events I don't agree that the lenght of the tournaments been to long, even if the hours per day have not been optimal running 27 levels day 1, we use to do 26 levels but some tournaments finished like 2 places from ITM sometimes so I added one level. This gonna be compleatly changed for next UOS, where day 1's will not try to reach the money and just go for 18-20 levels. This way we have a more equaly spread hours between day 1 and day 2 . Regarding the leaderboard and which tournaments should be in and which should not, that's something that we look constantly discussing and trying to be as correct and fare as possible, for all players. Three weeks of a serie could be seen as long, but not many players play every day, so see it as a option to participate in good tournaments over a long time, we also discussing that we might do one or so shorter series next year, not finalised yet though. Have nice upcomning  holidays!!    ... View more

@DeGuigs wrote: Thanks both   Unfortunately, we were only 3 at the beginning, so it hasn't run. @Leo-Unibet Would it be possible to use the €50 Unibet Open tickets to play the 17.45 and 18.30 super qualifier to UOS-1100? it is currently not possible. Hello @DeGuigs  I saw just three registered, four was needed  You can now use your UO €50 ticket for the qualifiers tonight, good luck! ... View more

@DeGuigs wrote: Hello dear Unibet community,  Would it be posible to add the €50 (r/a) qualifier to UOS €1100 Unibet Open tonight?  It ran everyday last week and you made money on it. It would probably be the same tonight.     Yes adding it  @DeGuigs , will show in client 19:25 Thanks @laifstaile  ... View more

@Janek wrote: @Leo-Unibet  would it be possible to allow registration with €100 only to 50,000 E89 UOS leftover ticket to €100 E115, E122 or €40,000 E129?   Hey @Janek   I made that ticket valid for other UOS €100 events. For the future, please don't participate in "ONLY for" qualifiers if you aint gonna use the ticket. Have a nice weekend!     ... View more

@vixere wrote: I guess it's probably the same user here. Considering some of the usernames that are banned and the fact you can't say sc am on this forum this is really bad. How has this user still got a unibet account?? Edit to add mods/staff to sort out the hatespeech: @Stubbe-Unibet @RayL @Leo-Unibet how about booting this racist forever?? Hello @vixere Thanks for your information, the alias is now obviously blocked /Leo    ... View more

@Kamon wrote: Hello @Leo-Unibet , I think the deatils on Unibet.com are not correct. It seems that some part was copied from UOS IX, but some things changed. E.g.: Total prizepool: € 1500 The prizepool of Nano will be shared equally. All qualified players will win the same amount Criteria: Players must have played at least 31 of all 44 nano events (> 70%).   In UOS X there are only 40 nano tournaments. Could you please tell me how many nano tournaments must have play to win a share form the prizepool? Thank you in advance!       Hello @Kamon  I will forward this to the man in charge ... View more

@FeelsBadMan wrote: @Leo-Unibet You don't have to explain yourself to us, we're just giving feedback (even though one feedback was a bit aggressive and drunk ) I like the 20 levels idea for day 1, indeed it's probably better to end far from the money and let it pop on day 2, that's mostly why we gave this feedback, not for the 2 people returning on day2, but more because of the unnecesarily long day 1 given the circumstances. And yeah I assumed it was because people complained about the bubble and their feedback focused more on lets just burst it already , understandable. As for having different setups for different buyins I understand where you're coming from, I have mixed feelings about this too, as low stakes players want to play good tournaments too, would definitly be against making them turbo, it just seems that the feedback is that thay're a bit too long for the very tiny prizes, and 10-12 for 1€ , 12-15 for 10€ with 15k chips still makes for a very well structured tournament compared to what else is available at their stakes (while very slow tournaments are more standard at the higher stakes), and it would also help making the total runtime more similar for the 4 tournaments despite the fact that the low ones have 3 to 4 times the entries,  and then you can make custom day1/day2 splits where day 1 ends at the same-ish time, but the lower ones are further along. Just an idea, dunno what is better, completely up to you what you consider is better, it's not something that affects me as I don't play the 1 , and I don't mind the 10 lasting however long, just basing this on a few personal anecdotes I've heard and lack any real data on what people prefer. Overall I really liked these tournaments, quite enjoyable to play    Thanks @FeelsBadMan  for your thoughtful writings, of course I have to explain how we ended up having a sick tournament as the €300. Because of yours and @Farseer  inputs we might have even better schedule whenever we make UOS11. It's a balance of making the majority of our customers happy and having a great time at the tables, we can't be optimal for all, but we can give it a try. Thanks guys, and good luck with the remaining of the series.      ... View more

@FeelsBadMan wrote: ^ Just posting a short translation of the angry finnish message. We all probably agree that day 1 could have been shorter (less levels), ideally day 1 and day 2 would be roughly equal, so like for a 10 hour total runtime, 5 hour day 1 +5 hour day 2. This time the "new DSO" had half the stack size (great change IMO) and 2 extra levels of day 1, compared to the old DSO Personally, other than the weird day 1 day 2 split which seems like an honest mistake, and that doesn't really affect me, I quite enjoyed the structure. a bit too deep at the start but got past that by lateregging an hour in. Also it probably would make sense to have lower events a bit faster, like for the 1€ event, don't think almost anyone would complain if it were a 10 min day 1 12 min day 2, and for the 10€ maybe like 12min day 1 and 15 minute day 2. The prizes just aren't worth it for most, and these blind timers would still give a very good amount of play for the level of thournaments at those stakes, and it would make it easier to split day1s and day2s equally-ish across the board.   I know I know, his angry message didn't seem like it said all this, but deep down it really did  @Leo-Unibet  Hello @FeelsBadMan  Thanks for you mail, I will try to break it down what happend. that day 1 could have been shorter (less levels), I know you nioticed the change we done lately where we used to run day one 26 levels and now gone over to do 27 levels on the first day, the reason for doing so is that before when we're running 26 levels it happend that we were closing day ones just a few placed from being in the money, 8 out of 10 times we would make the money within 26 levels but to please the load crowd I changed, and made day 1's 27 levels. So that's the reason for having 27 levels. We also changed day 1's from being 12 minutes to being 15 minutes, this made day one's 81 minutes longer, but made the BB avg much better. This time the "new DSO" had half the stack size (great change IMO) On this particullar tournament I wish we had more than the 15K in start stack and this tournament wouldn't been that awkward Personally, other than the weird day 1 day 2 split which seems like an honest mistake Not really a mistake, more like a effect of to little chips in play or to few entrances as in this €300 event 87+11 we're enough on a wierd playout like this. Normally, this tournament with this number of chips would be playing about 13 levels longer, 260 minutes, over 4 hours but due to how the players were busting out in rapid phase we had this strange situation. It's just sad that this happend, it's obviously not nice experience for the 2 players remaining in the tournament, the other 85 players were not affected , thankfully. I guess the money made for these players would make up for the sick circumstances. Also it probably would make sense to have lower events a bit faster, like for the 1€ event, don't think almost anyone would complain  I 100% understand that argumentation, but the ideais that all three tournaments starting in the same "slot" should be mirroring eachother, so that all players would have the same feeling of "great tournament with super nice structure" , no matter if you a nano player, or if you a regular €100-player. Give the lower buyin players the same experience. Good or bad, I don't know but I think they are worth that "feeling" to. I know I know, his angry message didn't seem like it said all this, but deep down it really did Thanks for explaining Adrian, but I understood what @Farseer  ment to :-) I solution after this experience is probably not to try to reach the money within day 1, probably just make the day 1's aprox 20 levels (105 minites) shorter and we have a day 2 where players will have an 1,5 hours play before reaching the money. After all, this was a extream ran-out tournament which ended on 2400-4800 but should normally been playing until aprox 12500-25000 I wish players, when they were in the money wasn't so eager to get it all in, they should enjoyed that tournament insted of pushing it  expect shorter day 1's in the future. Thanks for sharing your experiences and thoughts                   ... View more

@Farseer wrote: With this thing happening, I think that we all agree that non-Sunday 2-day UOS events have been ultra failure for everyone involved. I say: kill all of them for being 2-days (make them 1-day again) and make other events have shorter levels.     @Leo-Unibet  @Farseer  This 2-day event were exceptional when it comes to how it would run out, with the number of player this would, under normal circumstances been running for another 13 levels (260 minutes), as youi know, the length of a tournament with the same setup can vary alot in time.  This was just sick.  ... View more

@Russell81 wrote: After looking at the schedule for the upcomming UOS series, I was really interested in playing the 2 day events (Events 2, 3 and 4) which start today, the 22nd of November. However, it says in the lobby that day two of these tournaments will be played at 1900 on 21st September! This is obvious;y a mistake. Can anyone tell me when day 2 of these events will actually resume? Thanks, Kris. Hello @Russell81  Sorry for that typo, I hope you played it anyway and that you managed to get to day 2, 23 October  ... View more

@nightshopper wrote: Since last Sunday the Simpson Stream Special freerolls aren't visible anymore in the lobby, to Belgian players like myself. Until then we could play them, so I hope this is a temporary mistake? @Stubbe-Unibet @ReCorpH  Hello @nightshopper ,  Unfortunately some  tournaments in Ian's Seies that have added value aren't available for some countries. I hope you enjoy the mini series anyway  ... View more

@KenTouchMe wrote: No problem. Now that the tournament was changed i dont think this ticket will work. I dont know exactly what needs to be done , but you guys should i guess.  @KenTouchMe  Try now it will work ... View more

@KenTouchMe wrote: There is an error with the addon chips , i dont know if it's just in "writing" or the tournament will be affected by it.     Thanks for reporting @KenTouchMe  It's sorted now /Leo ... View more

@GN1991  They are extended now ... View more

  Hey again @Pickleman I looked in to those two tournaments, you were right, very shot going into the money E102 only 11,5 avg and E101 9,3 avg The runtime of aprox 4 hours for these tournaments starting 20:30 cet was perfect, I find a way to sort that to next time. Could the issue be players being to nitty, doing anything for reaching the money    ... View more

@Pickleman wrote: @Leo-Unibet  Hi again Leo. I thought I'd bump this previous thread given our conversation in another thread about the Omaha Sputnik structure (regarding adding antes to the Sputnik) but also now that we've had all the Omaha tournaments of UOS IX. So first of all some notes from E101/E102: the money bubble hit after only about 2:15 hours of play. At the beginning of the money bubble, the average stack had 18 bigs, then 14, then 11, and finally when the bubble burst the average stack had 9 bigs.  Please note that of the five sets of tournaments run, three had the "sputnik" structure I analysed above, and two had the 8k starting stack/6 min blinds that lead to having only 9 bigs on the bubble. Given that the UOS is Unibet's flagship online series, and given that Omaha is one of only two variants offered on the site, I think these tournament structures are a bit too fast. I mean, if I was going to enter a EUR25 or 50 tournament online, I'd like a better structure than that. Even the more recreational, gambly players might want a better bang for their buck. By comparison, the hold em tournaments have had some pretty amazing structures - and it doesn't have to be for big buy ins either. Some of the Nanos have been rebuys with 20k stacks/12min blinds or 15k stacks/15 min blinds. Bear in mind my point about Omaha having closer together preflop/postflop equities. If anything, Omaha tournaments should have BETTER structures than Hold em, not worse. So please do consider this when creating the schedule for UOS X. BTW, I'm happy to help - I've written lots of articles on tournament structure (I'm guessing I can't link to them here, but DM me if you want some links)   Hey @Pickleman , thanks alot for your thoughtful inputs, I will take those words with me going into next UOS series, I can just say without looking further, It sounds like it make perfectly sense. Cheers   ... View more

@cris1285 wrote: One of my 2 UO tickets will expire today, the tournies are not in the lobby yet, so im unable to register, and i wont be around before expiration time. Is it possible to extend only that one as a one time gesture @Leo-Unibet @ReCorpH @JeppeL ? Hello @cris1285  I have replaced your ticket. In the future, please don't use Exchanger if you don't have time to use all tickets before expire date  ... View more

  Thanks @Farseer  The event is a €50 event, lovely to have you guys sometimes  ... View more

@Greg  @Pickleman  Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I've been running these two, there is another one as well, daily omaha tournaments with ante structure as a test. I think both of you are pointing out problems with this kind of setup. I was not convinced this was a  super good idea from the beginning, I'm glad you pointed this out so we can adjust back to how it should be. It will be changed back to normal tonight. ... View more