@GothMoth wrote:
After Unibet introduced the new schedule a year ago the site is no more primarily cash-game oriented. The new tournaments are way more diverse in blind-structure, starting stacks, buy-ins, in various formats and are given witty names within a common cosmic theme. The change were proven success and the players are increasing every month as well the guarantees.
However I have some suggestions which should provide even more diversity and I think will appeal to the other MTT grinders. As a regular player of almost all €1-€10 buy-in tournaments and sometimes even the more expensive ones up to the €100 weekly Supernova my observations/suggestions are:
1.There are no 9 seat €10 buy-in tourneys except Sputnik which is R/A and despite the great structure is way too expensive for most players which usually play the €10 freezeouts or bounties. So i propose few €10 freezeouts, bounties or even reentries(all 9-seat) to be implemented into the schedule.
2. As mentioned above Sputnik has great structure or at least an interesting and refreshing one. So I think the introduction of €1, €2 and €5 buy-in versions to be very well received by the lower limits players
3.The €5 buy-in tournaments are way more than this with €2 buy-in and especially compared to the €10 ones. And when their start is too close as with €200 Wormhole and €100 Deep Space Fireball(only 15min. interval) it leads to not enough players in one of them sometimes. This happens rarely but there should be 1 tourney instead of 2 or maybe different buy-ins.
4.After Cosmic Rays was replaced by the Exoplanet there is no 9 seat major except the Supernova while the players preferring full-ring are roughly as much as the fans of 6-max.
5. Another thing which seems strange is that there is daily €50 buy-in Sputnik, but no €50 freezeout. Considering the potential cost of R/A it often gets more expensive than the Supernova. The other problem with the lack of €50 daily non-rebuy is that a player with €50 ticket have to wait for the Milky Way in Saturday in order to use it properly.
These are mine observations, 3 and 5 were brought to my attention by posts of fellow members and I guess many of the players share the same opinion on some of these ideas.
I find the "new" schedule almost perfect, nevertheless there is always a room for improvement. Also it will be nice if the regular players here express their views on the subject, as Unibet is well-known for listening and often implementing our recommendations.
@GothMoth Hi, I had a look at Falling and to some extent agree with you that some of them had to long run time, especially the €200 at 18:45CET which with plus 300 players run +5,5h , I lowered the start stack to 4,000, this will help a bit to make is a bit shorter. Many of the Falling runs about 4-4,5h , which I think it's a good runtime on a tournament, but I listen to you this time and adjusted. Don't take that for granted in the future
... View more
