Argevolen

---

@Stubbe-Unibet wrote:

@Argevolen, feature implemented to achieve a level playing field - we want everyone to a fair chance at winning :)

 

Do you have this assets issue often, or is it the first time?

---

________________________________________________________________________________________

It was preview of 2025 update.🤣

Sometimes I can't see my cards, but the whole table is the first time

did anyone test a new client on windows 7?

Thin value bet on the flop🤣

profit:Waterfall:

---

@FreedoM wrote:

---

@Argevolen wrote:

---

@Stubbe-Unibet wrote:

On Party you'd be at 20% rakeback, and you've gotten 25% here.

 

____________________________________________________________________________________-

 

100 points is 1 euro rake.

 

- If a player scores 10000 points (100 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 23 euro (23%)

- If a player scores 20000 points (200 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 38 euro (19%)

- If a player scores 30000 points (300 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 49 euro (16,3%)

- If a player scores 40000 points (400 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 49 euro (14,75%)

- If a player scores 50000 points (500 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 69 euro (13,8%)

 

If you accumulate 10,000 points in 3 months and complete monthly missions. You won't find a better rakeback anywhere.

50 000+ Won't see the promised 25% even with missions....

 

---

 

---

If you rake 100k CP you get more than 100eu in value (BP, Tickets, Bonus) and so on, etc. So before you come out trying to be a smart ass, at least do a litt bit of research. And at the end of the day, nobody is forcing you to play. Honestly i believe you are a nightmare as a costumer at any venue in the real world. 😏

________________________________________________________________________________

If you rake 100k CP you get more than 100eu in value (BP, Tickets, Bonus) and so on, etc.

aaaand..... 100k CP (1000 eu rake) / more than 100eu in value = more than 10% rakeback🤣

Dear @FreedoM  I find it very funny when a dumb ass starts telling a smart ass what she should do. But I'm not interested in wasting time on you. So I'm asking you to refrain from commenting on my posts...

---

@Stubbe-Unibet wrote:

On Party you'd be at 20% rakeback, and you've gotten 25% here.

 

____________________________________________________________________________________-

 

100 points is 1 euro rake.

 

- If a player scores 10000 points (100 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 23 euro (23%)

- If a player scores 20000 points (200 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 38 euro (19%)

- If a player scores 30000 points (300 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 49 euro (16,3%)

- If a player scores 40000 points (400 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 49 euro (14,75%)

- If a player scores 50000 points (500 euro rake) in 3 months.

rakeback will be - 69 euro (13,8%)

 

If you accumulate 10,000 points in 3 months and complete monthly missions. You won't find a better rakeback anywhere.

50 000+ Won't see the promised 25% even with missions....

---

@Stubbe-Unibet wrote:

@Argevolen, I always feel like editing your posts, as you've never made a correct quote reply 🤣 you need to put your own content just below the quote block :D

---

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

##########################################################################################

---

@Stubbe-Unibet wrote:

---

---

@waffel wrote:

Your thinking is flawed. I was discussing 4nl play, you are discussing like this hand was played on a 50nl stars table.

In this distribution, you just have to calculate the bank's chances. The betting limit has no effect on your equity.

 

How calling an open shove from a maniac would be negative ev just shows how wrongly you approach these stakes.

ALL-in from the regular from an early position you decided to ignore at all?

 

Don't get me wrong, the fact you over analyse this play proves you are by no doubt a profitable player. But if you wanna win 8bb/100 on 4nl or 15+ depends on how nitty you are in these kind of situations. I will snap call that guy with AJ+ and 77+ like there is no tomorrow. If a guy wakes up with a better hand after me is just variance.

You're trying to adjust the situation to your opinion. I wrote you above that with your range in this handout, you're gonna lose money.

Specifically, 10-10 will allow you to play zero or very weak plus... But it won't be enough to cover the rake and you'll still lose money!

Good to know there are still nits like you who would fold tens in that situation. I gladly take the crumbs.

We don't leave any crumbs🤣

---

How much does a moderator's head cost now?🆒

---

@GR1ZZL3R wrote:

If you like surprises and don't want to see all this month's missions, don't look.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

5e MTT

150 days

10k -profit

ROI-33% - 6K  mtt  40 mtt each day

ROI-100% - 2K mtt  13 mtt each day

---

@DoktorAvalanche wrote:

---

@freerol wrote:

This can be determined by the casino program, for example, in a situation with a higher kicker. One chip is irrelevant if the starting big blind is 30 chips.

---

Dude, what's your definition of a split pot? 

If i have A♠️K♦️ and you have A♣️K♥️

And the board is 3♣️4♣️5♥️6♦️7♦️

Who's got the 'higher kicker'?

A♣️ - trump

- Unibet corpotate color - green

-

---

@ReCorpH wrote:

As it's an online game, we have the option to give out .5 chips, so why shouldnt we? That's only fair. :)

---

May the Force be with you

---

@Stubbe-Unibet wrote:

Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's the SuperClient (an early version)

---

I"ll be back 🆒

1990

2020

---

@waffel wrote:

he had €2.5 with TT, maniac shoves and u call with 100bb, how tf can he not call with TT? 

is a near zero call. Why can't he throw it away?

"tight reg", like a tight reg matters on 4nl when u have a maniac that shoves and u get tens, it's unlucky for him you get dealt the world

or are you going to fold AJ+ 77+ etc? then you're just a bad nitreg 

In this situation call with 77 and AJ has strictly negative EV.

these 4nl analyses are the reason some of you are forever doomed in those stakes, even on unibet

either you deposit enough so you are rolled for 25nl or you change your mentality and go with the 4nl-flow

I was making a theme about rake on nl25. (you can find it and read it) After 1.5 years, the room made changes in the structure of the rake on this limit. But during that time, there were a couple of rooms with a good field and a rakeback offer...

I'd be very happy to see you there on the nl25-50 limits with a range  77+ AJ+...😀

 

 

 

 

 

---

---

@P0kerM0nk wrote:

NL4... 

Standard

---

---

@FreedoM wrote:

NL4 = €0.02/€0.04

POT: €35.55 ÷ €0.04 = 888.75 BBs

---

Good job!

There's one more mistake. But only the regular will find it...😏

GL

Standart open raise 3bb (533bb):Rofl:

KK -100% call

QQ - 100% call  He plays with Jonasson6.

10-10 - ?

we need 34% equity for a good call.
all-in from a maniac and call from tight reg

All major poker rooms use entropy sources in their RNGs. In the 21st century this is the basis for the safety and quality of number generation. It also significantly reduces the ability of the poker room to falsify the game.

Which entropy source uses relax gaming in the RNG for poker?

Something tells me that this source of entropy is called "random is random."😏

---

@fish8one wrote:

---

---

https://www.random.org/randomness/

These characteristics make PRNGs suitable for applications where many numbers are required and where it is useful that the same sequence can be replayed easily. Popular examples of such applications are simulation and modeling applications. PRNGs are not suitable for applications where it is important that the numbers are really unpredictable, such as data encryption and gambling.

__________________________________________________

Along with the existing need to generate easily reproducible sequences of random numbers, there is also the need to generate completely unpredictable or simply completely random numbers. Such generators are called random number generators (RNG). Since such generators are most often used to generate unique symmetric and asymmetric encryption keys, they are most often built from a combination of crypto-resistant PRNG and an external source of entropy (and it is this combination that is now commonly understood as a RNG).

Almost all major microchip manufacturers supply hardware-based PRNGs with different entropy sources, using a variety of methods to cleanse them from inevitable predictability. However, at the moment the speed of random number collection by all existing microchips (several thousand bits per second) does not correspond to the speed of modern processors.

In modern research attempts are made to use the measurement of physical properties of objects (e.g. temperature) or even quantum fluctuations of vacuum as a source of entropy for RNG.

In personal computers, the authors of software RNG use much faster sources of entropy, such as the sound card noise or processor clock counter. Gathering entropy was the most vulnerable point of the RNG. This problem has not yet been fully solved in many devices (e.g. smart cards), which thus remain vulnerable. Many RNG use traditional tried and tested, though slow, methods of entropy collection, such as measuring user response (mouse movement, etc.), such as in PGP and Yarrow, or interactions between threads, such as in Java SecureRandom.