Hi guys, I just set up a sample size of my poker stats and I'm curious whether you're seeing something I'm not seeing! So maybe some math/Excel freaks like @Purps find this topic interesting: Introduction: All the games were played at the SNG4 level. I play these games in a set of 4, meaning I'll fire up 4 SNGs at once and don't start another one once one of these 4 games ended. If I win, I'll write down "A", second place is a "B" anything else is an "X". So after one of these sets, I'll get something like "X, A, B, X". Attention: This is not the order in which I started the games, that's the order in which these games ended. So if I fire up 4 SNGs, they fill up pretty fast and I'll lose an all-in in my first hand during my last SNG, that would be the first "X". The first SNG that ended. Alright, now on to the stats: Here you can see explicitly how my performance went during the sample size. "4 left" is the result for the SNG that ended first and subsequently, "last" means that I was only playing 1 SNG (the last of my set) at the time. The performance during this sample is a little down, the ROI for "3 left" should usually be around 8 %, the ROI for "2 left" should be around 35 % and the ROI for "Last" something like 60 %. My question now is, do these stats suggest that I would be better off if I reduced the tables played to 3? Obviously, the way I collected the data, "4 left" is always going to be negative, but an ROI of -60 % is a little bit too much for my taste. And a HU Winrate of just 30 % also doesn't seem healthy.
... View more
