Hi @Keko , The difference between those two handicap sets is determined by the facts ( things that can not be change anymore in the game, regardless of future actions ) and assumptions ( high chance things that may happen , but until they are not fully completed, there is no way to get to that 100% certainty ). While your first bet from the screenshots ( -1.5 set handicap on Novak Djokovic ) is a 100% certainty fact , and in this case any further continuance of play could not possibly produce a different outcome, even if Djokovic would have had a comeback , that bet , with the current score before the retirement happen , would still have been lost. With the 3rd bet from your screenshot ( -2.5 set handicap on Wawrinka ) it's more based on assumption. It had indeed a very high chance of happening , but possible alterations could affect the outcome of the offer, so therefor , it was settled as void. You can read more about this and look at some line from T&C of Unibet , which covers your bets as well , in this thread . And when you say that in a combo bet slip , Wawrinka is settled as "won" , was the bet place of him to win , or what was on it? Cause if it was on him to win the bet, on Unibet , if a set has been played in a match , and a player retires after, regardless of the cuurent score , his opponent is settled as a winner .
... View more
