Nospheratu

Batman Beyond is a more mature take on the franchise i always liked that show. There's one episode in particular that's very unsettling not the subject matter but the way they chose to depict it i'm surprised they got the goahead and commend them for creating something like that for something kids essentially could be watching.

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6mgsde

---

@WuDu wrote:

---

@Nospheratu wrote:

The main gameplay camera turned away i think they have a policy of not giving attentions to pitch invaders but i guess she managed to get it anyway. Becoming famous over being the sidekick human billboard to a fake youtube prankster i would be truly ashamed but hey we're all different.

---

I still can't get over the fact that @jerry went full "White Knight" over her: "Oh that poor girl, someone hand her a coat, she might be freezing!" 🤣

She's the girlfriend of Vitaly. I think, she's had to do worse than that in the past to make him happy! :laugh: Since the game was so bad yesterday, I'd like to post one of his better pranks. Let's be honest, I'd wager a lot of money that most of the "people off the street" in his videos are paid actors. Having said that, I think this one is real:

/i/p.gif

I mean nothing really happened to her she just got taken off and that was that. Yeah i've heard she is his gf, the guy has been exposed as having recurring "strangers" in some of his videos and one where the stunt was to walk up and kiss the girl one of them was apparently some pornstar Katie Cummings. He probably fakes a ton of stuff especially the more brazen social interactions, that horror prank might be real because it's simple to get good reactions i guess but maybe it is fake too. It's been his schtick to crash sporting he "progressed" from the pranks to this so the payout is probably bigger.

The main gameplay camera turned away i think they have a policy of not giving attentions to pitch invaders but i guess she managed to get it anyway. Becoming famous over being the sidekick human billboard to a fake youtube prankster i would be truly ashamed but hey we're all different.

It's a nice storybook ending for Liverpool but i didn't want to see them win quite like that. The goal was anticlimatic and overall game a dull transportation from A to B, especially compared to what the teams had done previously. But it's still a win and the result counts.

@AndreiBNdo you have to guess 13+ times only for the bigger tournament or will you be ineligable for the daily guesses aswell if you opted in with a guess lets say day 3?

Going with Sadio Mane 11' this time.

What i always wonder is if a slot result is pre-determined as soon as the spin starts or whether it is actually "waiting" for all the symbols to land. Does the probability of a symbol to land on a reel represent a realtime event or is it a faux closeness just played out in an animated little sequence that is what i would ask them.

Very solid win. Everything over 1,000€ i'd be quite happy with so basically less than 50 correct guesses👍 

Messi 25' for me

---

@RayL wrote:

Hi @Ghost, sorry to hear that you are not enjoying our games as much as you used to. Nothing changed on our side, RTP is the same, all systems are up and running and some players are winning. There are ups and downs of course in a player's activity, but this is mostly related to luck than anything else. I'll go ahead and mention some of the aspects that make our games fair since unless mentioned it's just me re assuring you that everything is fine :)

We are being monitored by impartial 3rd party companies, they are found under the "Security and Trust" section at the bottom of the homepage:

 

There is the RNG (Random Number Generator) as well which ensures, well, a random outcome. 

Long story short, and I realize that this is not the answer you are looking for @Ghost, the system we operate under hasn't changed i'm afraid.

/Ray

 

---

Altough it seems that the waging range does change atleast sometimes, i don't know whether because of Unibet or the provider. I clearly remember Sunny Shoes having the min. bet 0.10€ but not it is raised to 0.25€.

It says i ran out of time to edit the message. What i was saying is that it's an unprovable and opinionated issue at it's core so you can never really make a fair call and as soon as the person feels he has been treated unjustly it becomes a fact that he has. It's not on me to prove that someone needs X seconds from his timebank the burden of proof falls on the one who claims that he doesn't.

The solution is for the timebank to be at a duration that people feel is OK to begin with as opposed to one wich evokes dissection and speculation when someone wants to make use of it. 

---

@Stubbe-Unibet wrote:

---

@Nospheratu wrote:

So X waits to the last second for every hand and some Unibet committee intervenes to argue him whether he truly needed his time or not isn't it obvious that the notion is completely r-tarded:waterfall:

---

If someone is waiting till the last second in every hand, there's no discussing whether or not the person needs the time. I can't really follow your logic tbh, and don't see an issue in trying to make the game enjoyable to everyone until there's technical solution in place.

Again, it's perfectly fine to take your time and occasional stalling is no issue at all. However, when it's every hand to the last second, it's a completely different case. You're not seriously trying to argue that anyone needs every single second in every single hand? 

How can you make the call who needs it and who doesn't? Since it's an unprovable issue by it's ver

Well i agree that it's bad etiquette but ultimately it is the  game mechanics that should change if anything not exist in an ineffective state and then changed with ad hoc quickfixes. Decide how much time should be alloted to the point where the persons intentions don't even matter and the issue dissappears immediately.

So X waits to the last second for every hand and some Unibet committee intervenes to argue him whether he truly needed his time or not isn't it obvious that the notion is completely r-tarded:waterfall:

---

@GR1ZZL3R wrote:

Thinking time is perfectly fine if that's what your doing.......thinking. Running the clock down on every hand when you know you are going to fold is not thinking..............it's stalling. There is a distinct difference between the two. :sad:

---

No there is no such distinction. Either you are given time or you aren't there's no inbetween "sometimes" based on someone elses arbitrary decision. All that person has to do is claim he needed the time and you have absolutely no case what so ever to prove him otherwise.

The timebank is the amount of time decided that people should be able to think about their move so whether someone uses it to pick the nose or go grab a soda instead is irrelevant; the time is theirs. They aren't using too much but rather it's the majority of people who choose to use too little there's a distinct difference between the two.

Personally i like seeing Messi winning individually and with Barcelona because he delivers so much and it gets validated. Even aside from the scoring the man is a great playmaker and really appreciates his teammates it's beautiful seeing him and Suarez happy together because it's so genuine and not just a formality.

I had Suarez on 23'

@CharismaManwhat did you win?

How likely is it that a chessgame plays out exactly the way it did in retrospect? Yet an extreme unlikelyness will play out on every single game. Every single person you see on the streets at just that time an place would've been extremely unlikely, and you can walk all day and see thousands of them.

Unlikely events happen all the time, whether you and the other person have the same suit and value or you have H10 D5 and he has C2 D7. But you don't remember the mundane only the outcomes that impacted you.

1. 2

2. 1-3

3. Over

4. 1-2

5. 1

6. 2-0

7. 0-3

8. 2

9. 2-2

10. Messi

A

A

a

B