Jump to content

Pickleman

Group: Flush
  • Posts

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pickleman

  1. Thanks @Jami-Unibet,

    I wouldn't usually bother bringing it to the community, but: a) they've been sent copies of bank statements twice and b) if I speak to online chat again I just "know" I'm going to have to start from the beginning, and given the number of pitfalls there have been so far (I've been told multiple times that I "have" to use trustly, which of course I don't; and I've had it accepted multiple times that I don't have to use trustly only to hear nothng on doing what was required of me), I figure I'll just wait. I'm not in a hurry but this is getting a bit silly now.

     

    Many thanks in advance.

  2. @Jami-Unibet Hi Jami. How long does it take for an account verification (in reality)? I've jumped through all the hoops and it's been longer than the "5 days in busy times". Just don't know if my case has fallen off the list to end up in purgatory or is genuinely being dealt with. And of course, if I contact online chat I'll have to go through the entire process from the beginning (already done this twice).

  3. On 1/28/2022 at 3:34 PM, Andy-Unibet said:

    Just had it confirmed that it's the top 17% only. We'll get the T&Cs updated, thanks for bringing it to our attention.

    Out of interest if 17% of pool is a fraction does it round down or up? So if there are 98 runners in the tournament does it give leaderboard points to 16 or 17 players?

  4. 18 hours ago, Merenitsu said:

    Another one for the collection. Might be useful. In Omaha, collect 4 identical cards preflop. for instance AAAA KKKK QQQQ etc 🙂

    Yes, with the promos, make sure to state explicitly in the rules whether it's NLHE only. Some of the tasks would be much easier to get with PLO

  5. On 1/10/2022 at 10:24 AM, Stubbe-Unibet said:

    So, in other words: without the added edge due to addon, you wouldn't play. I don't think that's an argument for keeping the format, quite the contrary 🙂 

    If you wanted to reduce the late reg bunfight and reduce the edge the adders-on have over those who are not rolled or else not aware that it's rational to add on, you could always keep R/As but reduce the addon chip amount to the same as the buy in.

    That's the way addons used to be. It's just the poker providers migrated to double addon to make it even more value to add on (therefore increasing rake).

×
×
  • Create New...