Jump to content

FeelsBadMan

Group: Flush
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by FeelsBadMan

  1. @Tekes Can confirm everything you said, about 8 years ago I have noticed the exact same thing, and then I started copying the winning strategies, just staking off preflop for hundreds of BB with T6, T2o , 32o, 72 any suit, and since then I've had a winstreak like I've never had before, 92 consecutive winning months, and the winnings have increased over time. So if you've also figured out this strategy, please go to another site, this is my site now, I do not want to share my winnings with other observant people that understand the algorithm. I guarantee you, I WILL HAVE a worse hand and I will win, if you try to replicate my strategy. 😡

     

    On a more serious note, it is good advice, if you feel like something is not right and is affecting your mental health, move to another site, not worth the mental anguish. I was serious about the first part too but even more serious about this. 😉

    • Haha 3
  2. On 06/04/2024 at 22:57, XY said:

    Hi @Stubbe-Unibet , 

    there is long time going on glitch , when you decide to mark/use/check " fold to any bet" option and when opponent fold his hand at the same time .


    If "fold to any bet" is pressed at the same time when heads-up player decide to fold , and chips are passing towards our direction , our very next hand is auto-folded without buttons fold/call/raise showing up.

     

    It happed to me just few minutes ago in Hexa , but sadly I didnt record it. 😒

    I've tried to reproduce it a lot, intentionally trying to get it and haven't managed even once, by the time the chips reach the middle and haven't even started traveling to you, the fold to any bet button has already disappeared and clicking that area was doing nothing. I feel like it requires superhuman timing or a very laggy client to reproduce 🤷‍♂️

    • Thanks 1
  3. Looks like on version 3.35.0 if I have my speakers connected it will now successfully move to the speakers when the headphones DC and I can then manually move them back. IDK when this started working as I haven't tried it in a while (it didn't work for a long time) but it's a nice workaround to not having unibet perma muted. It's still not as seamless as Stars where the audio just comes back the moment the headphones reconnect even without an extra device to do this workaround. With a single device it still doesn't work even on 3.35.0 on 2 different PCs tested with multiple different audio devices one at a time.

    I wouldn't necessarily consider this solved, but it is much much better, and it doesn't seem to happen to everyone.

  4. When disconnecting an audio output device either intentionally to switch devices or accidentally by moving a cable or battery for bluetooth headset running out) and reconnecting it Unibet completely loses audio with no way to regain it until you restart the software. It's the only app that does this. As you can see in the videos Unibet has no audio, while Stars recovers audio immediately without pressing any buttons.

    I've tried everything to recover audio on unibet without restarting, every in client audio setting, mute unmute, move to another audio device (when multiple are connected) and back, works on neither, force the default audio device in windows, removed and readded the device, enabling and disabling the device, different headset, different PC.  

    Sometimes, albeit rare, the client starts with no audio, which you won't realize until you start playing, If it would have any way of recovering audio then this would not be a problem.

     

    o    When did issue occur: All the time for a long time.

    o    Which client(s) are impacted: Desktop

    o    Info about your device: Windows 10 & Bluetooth True Wireless Headphones JLab

    o    Steps to reproduce: Recommended with Bluetooth headphones but have reproduced it with wired headphones as well by unplugging them and replugging them in

    Open the poker client with your headphones connected.

    Disconnect your headphones.

    Reconnect the headphones.

    No more sound until the client is restarted.

     

     

     

     

  5. Table priority works well in general, possibly one of the best so I wouldn't change it, but whenever there's a table where you have busted the tournament that table gets permanent top priority. As you can see in the video, whenever it's your turn to act on any table, the busted table pops up in front and not the table that you have to act on. If you close that busted table, the next busted table will be top priority. If you have any kind of overlap you urgently have to close every busted table to not have it cover your active tables. Possibly same issue on mobile since after having a busted table, no other table can pop up in front until you close that busted table, which can't be good when mobile tables are always overlapping. 

    Sometimes, the busted table won't even let you get to the table where it's your turn to act without clicking the busted table first, as you can see in the first video I am spam clicking the table and it just won't let me put it on top. I even fold a hand at second 36 and it still doesn't put the table on top.

    o    When did issue occur: All the time for the past 2 years, probably since the last table priority update. 

    o    Which client(s) are impacted: Desktop and Mobile Android

    o    Info about your device: Desktop Windows 10 and Mobile Android 12

    o    Recording date and device:

             - 2nd on the 19-03-2024 on Desktop client v3.34.0

             - 1st on the 20-03-2024 on Desktop client v3.35.0

     

  6.  

     

    When did it happen: 19/03/2024 around 16:00 UTC

    On what client did it happen: Android client, ver 3.34.0

    Internet connection when issue occurred: Wifi

     

    Bug description: When clicking on the logout button on the mobile app I get you are logged out and then I get this error page, could be related to the white screen after timeout bug. IDK if it matters but the error gives a different version than that of my client.

    Screenshot: image.thumb.png.d1f283fad57cef0287ac935a4870e361.png

  7. There is one simple reason for why different structures make sense. While there are people that would like the same experience as the high buyin but for an affordable price, I feel like most people would not be big fans of staying up till 5 in the morning for a 50€ top prize when they have work in the morning. When it's a 1000€+ prize the attitude changes, proportionally might be the same 50 buyins or whatever but one feels a whole lot more worth the time invested. This is pretty much the only thing that matters and Andy mentioned this as his reasoning too. 

    On 2/26/2024 at 10:44 AM, Stubbe-Unibet said:

    This doesn't make any sense to me. You're saying "fun players" want the slowest possible tournaments. This does not match up with any of the data I've got. Quite the contrary 🙂

    This might not be the preference of all "fun players" but pretty much all the players that do prefer this at the nano stakes are fun players, that want a super slow structure to play for fun. These are the players that have fun playing poker and don't care that their hourly rate in that structure is 2 cents an hour. You see that in live tournaments too where people enjoy a multi day 200€ buyin despite it not being worth to travel to. Still doesn't mean super slow makes sense for these big series tournaments, but there is a portion of fun players that like these formats. Not every fun player is a Stubbe 😀

     

    On 2/26/2024 at 12:05 PM, Andy-Relax said:

    The slower the tournament, the worse it is for bad players, because they're going to get chewed up postflop by good players. What players want, and what it good for them are two different things a lot of the time. 

    I hate the "the players don't know what's good for them" argument so much, especially since it was such a failure of a strategy in the gaming industry whenever it was applied. What players want is to have fun, what is good for them is to have fun, not to lose 3% less at the expense of their fun. But it's better for your bankroll to stop having fun! If they stop having fun they stop playing ... poker is not the only activity one can do for fun in the world. If players want a format that is "bad for them" but they have fun in, they should be given that format. And that's how we ended up with spins, they are the most destructive, most bad for the player format to ever exist, but people enjoy it, particularly mobile / very low on time players, so it is provided to them. This still doesn't mean that an uber slow format would have made sense for the series as I don't think it's the majority preference, only went on this tangent because it's just a dumbass argument that needs to be put out of itss misery. 

    • Like 3
  8. The avatars marked with New are generally the ones that can be unlocked through the loyalty tree every quarter and it's usually very easy, something like level 2 or something. Different ones will be added from time to time, this one has been there for a year I think, so hasn't happened in a while as they have focused more on achievement avatars. Loyalty progress can be a bit delayed depending on the game. 

    I think the red glasses avatar is part of the Daily specials collection, so something related to the Saturday Extreme Hexapros, maybe getting into a 125x extreme jackpot or winning it, that would fit with your experience, since the 125x 10€ hexa is the one that pays 1000€ for the win ... the 1000x pays 8000€ for the winner.

    • Like 1
  9. Personally I like option 3, permanent jackpot mania, or at least in between certain hours. While normal extremes are just a slightly modified (improved) hexapro, but with very high rake for the speed, with jackpot mania it kinda feels like a completely different game, sort of like a dungeon where you have to clear a ton of trash mobs to get to the boss fight that spawns randomly and you can see it getting closer and closer. And then you have to fight 2 bosses that can be super hard or even super weak, but they can still 1 shot you, all the while you still have to finish the trash mobs on the other tables. This format is EXTREME! 😄 Whoever built it deserves a raise!

    Stakes wise, I prefer 5 and 10€ stakes but I'm sure smaller stakes people would be sad with such a setup, multiple days to satisfy everyone, or every day would be ideal 🙏

    Counter vs Timer format, personally I preferred a counter because it feels more exciting, like you're competing against a legion of players, instead of competing against the clock, but it makes complete sense that the timer version would likely be easier to maintain and schedule (and harder to precalculate effective rake I guess). Either is fine.

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  10. On 11/12/2022 at 11:03 PM, Stubbe-Unibet said:

    Schedule can perhaps be shared here later 😉 

    That's great, but was mentioning such a feature so that the general population can see it too, to increase traffic. Won't matter much now anyway with 2s and 5s, they'll get traffic regardless, so it's fine.

  11. I was mostly joking with the 100s, even though I would love it 😄 . Probably wouldn't have mentioned it if it wasn't a downgrade from the usual 10s that get a ton of players. Still a really cool promo even as is. 

    I think you're really underestimating the number of games that would start with a 12k prizepool, it won't be just the 0 players in there already. The main issue would be making it clear when the big ones are, having in the promos window an actual schedule with times and stake for people to know to be online at that time (I would also have a few up next in the banner while we wait for the next to start), maybe have it on the website as well. The current system where there's just a number of certain stake jackpots in the entire period is really bad at getting players to be present especially within such short timeframes. 

     

    Obviously it would be a bigger cost, I'm just shooting my shot, at not having a snore cup 😁 

  12. On 11/8/2022 at 8:39 PM, Stubbe-Unibet said:
      • All HexaPro Extreme games will be on the new €2 and €5 stakes during the promotion

     

    Why do the stakes have to be so low and boring? let's spice it up a bit, maybe some 10s, maybe some 25s, maybe some 100s 😅 It's the World Cup, not the Snore Cup 😴

    • Like 1
  13. On 10/31/2022 at 8:50 PM, DonkeyHunter said:

    As you can see the PKO's are very top heavy. And because of that you lose some of the survival aspect. Here are the percentages for reference.

    Ironman [20.46, 14.60, 10.73, 7.85, 5.86, 4.33, 3.18, 2.26, 1.63, 1.27]

    Title Fight [22.62, 11.66, 8.03, 6.48, 4.78, 3.19, 1.62, 2.66, 1.20, 3.14]

    IMO PKOs don't need the same level of survival imperative baked into them as normal tournaments, because that's how you end up with people getting into top 5 consistently with 0 or 1 bounties. They're missing the whole point of the tournament and a large part of the fun and EV, they're supposed to go for bounties and create action. Obviously you can't go too far in the opposite direction either like the 90% bounty tournaments where getting far is pointless, that's no longer a tournament, just flinging bounties at eachother. The current iteration has great incentives to both go for bounties and for late game survival which always have to be weighed against each other when deep, and that made for some really fun tournaments the past week, with some great final table dynamics.  Also due to these being PKO's it would feel kinda crummy to be paid slightly above half the buyin for cashing as opposed to regular tournaments where at least you get more than you paid for it, so I think it would make sense to have a bit less people paid in PKOs, to have it be a bit more satisfying. 

    A little bit more flat, sure, that can be reasonable (personally I've enjoyed them the way there are now), just not too much, which I assume is what you want too, only mentioning it because feedback has a habit to be applied to the extremes, like a few people asked for addons, Eeeeevrything became an addon, a few people wanted 6max, eeeverything became a 6max 😅

    • Like 5
  14. On 10/22/2022 at 1:15 PM, Livertool said:

     

    I still think ongame poker tables and lobby was best that there has ever been with it's clearity. It was even ahead of it's time with diversity 🤣

    Any chance @Stubbe-Unibet that we can get this table layout for unibet without breaching copyrights? 🙏Screenshot_2022-10-22-13-12-22-010.thumb.jpeg.22029da048d2d402de1a4f1b33698b7e.jpeg

    oh wow, I forgot about those types of table layouts that were all over the place back in the day, so ugly 🤮

  15. 23 minutes ago, Stubbe-Unibet said:

    I'll throw an extra mission in the mix, as I think it's likely 4 or 2 don't get completed. Extra mission will be:

    9. Get into 6*1.5x games in a row (game lab screenshot please) OR get into a 125x HexaPro Extreme game and finish 2nd or 3rd

    yeah thought that #7 might not have been a winner, good idea with the gamelab and the new mission, already done btw for #9 😄 

    image.jpeg.c87197bd5dad8fa341f1173ab858e8d9.jpeg

    • Thanks 1
  16. A better color scheme for the multipliers in Hexapro Banzai would be great. In classic Hexapro, unibet is probably one of the best to easily differentiate on the table which multiplier you are currently playing. In Extreme however, most multipliers look the same, it's especially problematic on mobile. The red is also very attention grabbing, probably too attention grabbing to be used on 1x multipliers.

×
×
  • Create New...