Jump to content

Silver1

Group: 72
  • Posts

    0
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Silver1

  1. Sounds as a good Idea to eliminate the Hexapro during the MTT grind. If I play MTTs I don’t have cash game tables or Hexapro on the side. As you are mentioning I don’t want to mix games during my sessions where the strategies are not in line with each other. I also think it can for some people mess up the game. I have add in some SNGs on the side during my MTT sessions, as I have said before, due to that the way you play in SNGs mimics MTTs pretry well in some aspects.

    Wish you all the luck in the hunt for a spot to Manchester @MetalWol!

    • Like 2

  2. @UAC wrote:

    @Silver1 thanks man, appreciate it.

    Yeah initially I thought 10nl was pretty much the same as 4nl, but the more I play the more familar faces I see and some def give me trouble. Oh and PM me your alias haha

    One I have noticed over the past few days is BluffTheSpot, lierally only seen him last 2 days. I haven't played many pots with them (apart from when they flopped a set and I had KK :p ), but I guess they're affiliated with the coaching site and seem solid.


    BluffTheSpot is definitely a competent player at NL10.

    Will PM you:)

    • Like 1

  3. @Esir wrote:

    @UAC Thank you. I'm not sure how many hours I play, I usually take in consideration how the game is going, if I'm still playing as good as I can and if I'm having fun.

    Ideal would be to move up in stakes but I'm taking a conservative approach so I'm in no hurry.


    @Esir I like the conservative approach! How many buy-ins do you have as a requirement before moving up in stakes?

  4. @UAC there are some competent guys at NL10 which I give respect. And always interesting to hear from others at the level what they think:)

    Good runs comes and goes, just keep playing and see where it goes and adjust according to your BRM:) Fun following the blog!

  5. Sounds like standard spots and setups in which there is not much to do in those cases. So don’t be to hard on your self or over analyze your play if it feels good in overall. As long as you play according to standard and not donking around (with funky plays and crappy holdings) I think you should be happy with your game. And if you don’t feel motivated to play the best thing is to not play and do something else that you find fun and relaxing:happy: There are many days left on this year mate😉

     

    • Like 1

  6. @Silver1 wrote:

    Would estimate following as a potential calling range pre flop against your 3bet QQ-99, ATs+, QJs, JTs, T9s, AJ+.

    KK-AA should be 4-Bet pre, these combos are less in his calling range. And you holding a K is reducing the combos of KK to be less likely (3). And when a K hits the flop there is only 1 combo left.

    You holding a K reduces the potential AK combos (preflop 12 and postflop 8) and if he is competent he might 3Bet some of them pre.AK is less likely weighted.

    Kind of like the check on the flop with the argument of that you can’t get three streets of value, can also see betting as a +EV play.

    First guess: JJ

    Second guess: AJ

    Third guess: ATs (hearts) or JTs (hearts)


    I was out hiking guys, thought that he like never should wake up with AA and KK here if he was a reg.

    Dont think you over sold the hand. It only shows potential lines and outcomes that take place in the micros. Seen this line taken as well and most of the times opponents can’t let go of their overpairs. You took him on a trip to valuetown.

  7. Would estimate following as a potential calling range pre flop against your 3bet QQ-99, ATs+, QJs, JTs, T9s, AJ+.

    KK-AA should be 4-Bet pre, these combos are less in his calling range. And you holding a K is reducing the combos of KK to be less likely (3). And when a K hits the flop there is only 1 combo left.

    You holding a K reduces the potential AK combos (preflop 12 and postflop 8) and if he is competent he might 3Bet some of them pre.AK is less likely weighted.

    Kind of like the check on the flop with the argument of that you can’t get three streets of value, can also see betting as a +EV play.

    First guess: JJ

    Second guess: AJ

    Third guess: ATs (hearts) or JTs (hearts)

  8. Interesting @Brocky.

    I am not totally against the limp and maybe that is the standard play here, I’m not so updated in the MTT starts these days. 

    What do you think about balancing the range there with the lumps? Do we ever appear with AA/KK/QQ/AK/JJ/AQ at the flop after a limp in that spot or do we just give an f in balance and play exploitative with limps (I.e mid strength hands and low strength hands that are two week to play OOP) at the given stack sizes?

    Like the discussion and exchange of thoughts mate!

    • Like 1
  9. @Brocky Interesting thoughts! The A7s I think we can raise and expect that BB will fold out a larger portion of his range if we do 2.8-3xBB. I don’t think that the majority of the players defend the BB in this situation wide enough to theory and therefor we can exploit this. But we do take a larger risk to reward and we can also take in discussion how well A7s will do on a flop but I think I will go for a raise here the majority of the time but might mix in a limp here and there dependent on the opponents stack size.

×
×
  • Create New...