Jump to content

Unfair bet loss ? Wawrinka novak


Go to solution Solved by AndreiBN,

Recommended Posts

It doesn't make sense that the same type of bet on novak is lost and the one with wawrinka is invalid (which I was gonna win, already a payout of 25euro). And in a multiple it said wawrinka won but in the one I was gonna win it's invalid...



Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Solution

Hi @Keko ,

The difference between those two handicap sets is determined by the facts ( things that can not be change anymore in the game, regardless of future actions ) and assumptions ( high chance things that may happen , but until they are not fully completed, there is no way to get to that 100% certainty ).

While your first bet from the screenshots ( -1.5 set handicap on Novak Djokovic ) is a 100% certainty fact , and in this case any further continuance of play could not possibly produce a different outcome, even if Djokovic would have had a comeback , that bet , with the current score before the retirement happen , would still have been lost.

With the 3rd bet from your screenshot ( -2.5 set handicap on Wawrinka ) it's more based on assumption. It had indeed a very high chance of happening , but possible alterations could affect the outcome of the offer, so therefor , it was settled as void.

You can read more about this and look at some line from T&C of Unibet , which covers your bets as well , in this thread .

And when you say that in a combo bet slip , Wawrinka is settled as "won" , was the bet place of him to win , or what was on it? Cause if it was on him to win the bet, on Unibet , if a set has been played in a match , and a player retires after, regardless of the cuurent score , his opponent is settled as a winner .

"When things are bad, it's the best time to reinvent yourself"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now

  • Create New...