Kliedz_Zivju

this is super awsome 🙂 look forward too this 😛 TY TY... a tough choice between the bubble bursters and BANZAI!!! 🙂 ALL IN!!!!😍

BANZAI!!!!!

your happy thats fine. im worried... thats also fine, this is my blog were i moan all i want so im nit bothering stubbe all day. im happy for you too keep posting bringing my topic up but your waisting ya energy trying too show off your skill edge on me. ill see you at the tables :s my alias is moist_flops if we play the same stakes? i presume your a high stakes crusher from your superior levels and some years study.

you dont even realise that im thinking about the bigger picture? you dont have a point? your just going on with yourself like you know better, when you show very little understanding of my point and only care about yourself... the point you are trying too make is realpy basic entry level theory.. im talking about a comletely different spot too you? and you dont even understand too make relevent comments :s
@Estzeng

@Estzeni understand what you are saying.

you think all the MTT format should be slow and deep becuase poker is a game of skill and the skilled player should win all the money. you want the format too advantage you, who already has an edge...

what im sugesting is this will lead too all the fun players not winning enough money too stick around and the games being boring.

im sugesting that the formats should favor the bad players SOMETIMES so the weak players stick around. and dont go play at another client were the games are more "fun"

i havnt said im a bad player and i want unibet too take the advantage from the skilled players.

we just think differently. i think money is gained from bad players, you think its from your skill edge.

im not even sugesting taking any MTT away, im sugesting "add more MTT".

i cant do the math of "some years" im afraid. i dont even know what stakes you play too judge your skill level. study doesnt make you special it keeps you ahead of the learning curve. everbody does it...

@Estzenim talking about bubbles and ladders, your talking about 100bb stacks and cash games.... one day i will know what? you dont even realise we not talking about the same thing.

advise from me: if you play MTT study heads up and ICM before you study 100bb. if you think 100bb is were the skill is found then play cash game.

@Estzenand your evidence is? 😄 ive lost track of what your point is to be honest. lets just agree too disagree

@Stubbe-Unibet im not actually comparing it too the old structure, im just sugesting that having all the games the same flatt payout structure is boring

@Estzen its irrelevent to my point anyway :S im happy too say mix it up abit all the deep, slow and flatt formats favor the tight players and the players with an "edge" i dont see all these turbos you mentioning :s nearly every game in the shedual has a big S? if you discount and satty or madness format. different levels 😄 ok

On 12/14/2021 at 8:20 PM, Estzen said:

It may be the case here that you believe the opposite, but I think the reason you think so, is that our understanding of the game is in very diffrent levels. 

 

 

cash is a completely different game too MTT poker i wouldnt mix the advice.... even the flat pay outs favor tight play.

microstake winners can win because opponents are way too loose, but it actually just makes the game more skill dependant.   < that is a load of waffle... i think you just over rate your "edge"

On 12/6/2021 at 2:47 PM, Estzen said:

I dont agree with that statement at all. Its just makes a game more skill dependant. If you think it suits tight players you are wrong, because with being a nit what it does it - you will loose a lot of value in spots where you should actually get it. It comes more down to the player knowledge base how much he has the ability to interpret the situations. Unibet is a unique place with recreational playerpools with good sturcture for the game flow where even they have the least of all varience. 

i belive the oposite. i think varying blinds and differing stack sizes increases the skill requirement in terms of ICM, The major factor in MTT all slow blinds does is allow tight players too wait for a premium holding and exploit the recreational who call down too light vs large sizing. im not sayin NO SLOW DEEP GAMES. im saying a nice variety too please all player types will keep the pool dynamic atm it just feels STAGNENT....not just having all games how you like them personaly. this UOS was so boring format wise. it was awful im not putting myself out to play it next time if it will be them same. (i think uni maybe trying too apeal too the live players which cant play live ATM)

and im not wrong? it deffinately suits tight players who can wait for premo holdings... you wont loose value from playing tight and aggresive vs call stations and weak players. you may miss a few spots but that will be over compinsated by bad calls vs your aggresion and that has nothing too do with the format of the MTT.

@Leo-Unibet are we missing a 5 euro galaxy tonight? i randomly had a 2e galaxy omaha in my favirots. dunno if that is related

On 12/5/2021 at 5:43 AM, Estzen said:

Mostly people are not regging when they cant make money. Unibets strucktures are very good. 

i like the structures. more variety would be nice. atm each game feels like slow, deep stacks long blinds which is fine. i dont mind these games, it deffinatelty suits the tight players better then loose agrresive. some variety would be nice given the payout structures are already so flatt and pay out so many people. seems too also suit the tight players who sit and wait for premium rather then play the game 😛 the player pool i belive will grow too reflect this and the games will become more and more dry. unibet main pulling factor in the past was the wild aggresive player pool and the top heavy pay outs you could make a really decent ROI.

On 12/3/2021 at 12:36 PM, Stubbe-Unibet said:

And again you fail at actually providing any useful information. I asked some questions, because I'd genuinely like to explain things for you, but you seem to only be interested in whining without being constructive in the slightest. A shame it has to stoop to this level. I would love to discuss tangible examples and proper feedback and explain the direction and decisions, but it's not possible with your "contributions".

what do i have too say for it too be counted as feedback? i tried a short answer. i tried a long rant and i have attempted a middle ground :s

the blue moon im refering too the "mercury blue" if you didnt get the inside joke

On 12/3/2021 at 12:39 PM, Stubbe-Unibet said:

SNG's are performing fine. Jackpot SNG's/HexaPro doing incredibly well. Cash games doing really great. You derailed the release notes chat with MTT feedback, and now you're bringing all other game types than MTT's into an MTT discussion....

I'll let Leo reply to the MTT stuff 🙂 

im just posting in a topic ive had running for a while now? so any people i have been playing games with realise why im not regging anymore. i think its time unibet sacked the backroom staff and hired some winners with a scope and vision of the future, if you wanted me too continue my previous rant on a completely different topic. 😄 do you actually play any of these games @Stubbe-Unibet 😄

not gonna early reg the blue moon anymore... or any other non bounty MTT. wont be playing the new 6 max only bounty as its a shocking choice. (if people want more 6 max add more 6 max) really failing the regualr pool atm unibet so i will probly just move my main hustle too another site and just use unibet as a side hustle and look out for overlay. the schedual is crap the cash games are shocking and the sit n go might aswell just be deleted.  really big shame comming from one of unibets top fan boys, but it is what it is.

On 11/30/2021 at 7:44 PM, Stubbe-Unibet said:

You're missing the point. There's a difference between saying you're happy and really like something and then say you dislike the same without giving any details at all. If you like something and don't see a need to change anything, why would I ask for further details? If you dislike something on the other hand and want your feedback to be listened to, you'll need to specify and give details.

 im sugesting that all the changes you are making are not improving the sight and are a waiste of RSS which could be used elsewere too actually attract more players.(that is my feedback) the sight is dying a slow death IMO as a regular who makes an effort too reg MTT too get them too run. covid covered a scar. the dutch sounds like a poor exuse.

without a player pool the software is pointless. 

On 11/19/2021 at 3:53 PM, Stubbe-Unibet said:

To the point and useless - you might as well post a cat video 🙂

Literally can't use that feedback at all. Like how do you want me to action it or even care about?

but when someone puts something like "great wonderfull" you fill them with thanks for the great feedback? sounds like you just dont like any kind of comments that dont fit your narrative? if you want too make something better improve the input for the betting its the only thing that needs improving ill give you some feedback you can use in light of all the recent updates...

unibet now feels like a cheap copy of GG poker and partypoker which have superior schudual which is infact the only thing that needs updating. it really is going down hill if you cant see that your just being ignorant as a team and only choosing too listen too what makes you happy.

you are waisting resource that could be better used elsewere.... who is asking for any of this change?  all that was constantly asked for is update the rake system which you promised years before actually delivering it?? game lab is pointless, the new look has just moved everything about the only features i like are the features too turn off the anoying things youve added too the tables and the favirots tab in the schedual.

were have all the players gone? why do so many MTT fail too start? why isnt the pool growing? why have the GTD vanished too point you might aswell just remove them the people regging are gonna reg anyway no one new is showing up and all the old players are leaving?

how do you call this progress??? partypoker ang GGpoker are leagues above unibet after you have put so much effort in? you are ahead of pokerstars in terms of aethstetics but nobody cares about that clearly the only pull factor is the great MTT schedual.

37 minutes ago, Stubbe-Unibet said:

Appreciate the detailed and constructive feedback 🤣

its too the point. just so you know everyones opinion....

dont like any of it

40 minutes ago, Pionrj said:

I'm pretty sure that they've zero to none feedback on Falling Star bounty. And this is purely a business decision. I just today went through 5 different sites and about 70% of all bounty tourneys are 8- or 9-max(excluding Omaha). 

 

So this just has to be BS. Don't think that Unibet would have so much different customers that they'd ever want all the bounties to be 6-max.

i could understand it being a buisiness desicsion if their wher actually other MTTs too register 😄😄

dont worry 😢

so confusing thanks for the update @Purps sad times

On 11/16/2021 at 4:57 PM, Leo-Unibet said:

Hello @Pionrj, I have received feedback that most players prefer faster tournaments and don't want to play too long, also that shooting is 6 handed and is better suited for bounty tournaments

 

who have you had this feedback from every player? or just the community regs :s so confusing