KenTouchMe

A. 10 or anything less number of max winning points in row, in total , from both players ( Swiatek + Podoroska ), in this match.

D. This match will not have any tie-breaks

D. 22 or over number of games played in total in this match .

---

@GN1991 wrote:

---

@KenTouchMe wrote:

Finally i got it 

3 x 10 euro please 

---

Congratz :cash:

Thanks ! Now going for the points.

Finally i got it 

3 x 10 euro please 

A. We will have , in total ,from both players ( Dimitrov + Tsitsipas ) , 60 or less"winners"  in this match.

B. 5 or 6 double faults made in total , by both players ,in total in this match.

D. Unforced erros will be at least 61 or anything above in this match , from both players ( Djokovic + Galan ) , in total.

D. "Breaks" count will be at 6 or over  in this match , in total ,from both players.

B. In the 2nd set of the match we will have the most games played.

---

@AndreiBN wrote:

---

@kickserv wrote:

AndreiBN

When are the tickets for the Poker Tourney going to be issued?

---

@kickserv , tickets for the €100 US Open Community Poker tournament will be issued , either later today or latest , tomorrow early in the afternoon , CET . As it starts Wednesday , 30th september @20:00 CET , there is still plenty of time. 

The poker tournament set-up wizard for this one, @ReCorpH , will give more details about the structure and maybe , just maybe , there will be small extra thingys added. I will post a couple of reminders for those eligible to take part in it and let's hope it will be a fun one.

So there will be KO's ? :Tongue: In the lobby doesn't look like it. 

A. 2-0 ( Tsvetana Pironkova to win the match with this score ).

C. 32-33-34 games played in total in this match .

B. 18-19 games in total for this one.

D. This match will not have any tie-breaks.

D."Winners"  will be at least 86 or anything above in this match , from both players ( Zverev + Thiem  ) , in total.

A. 2-0 ( Naomi Osaka to win the final with this score ).

A. 19 or anything under Aces ,in total, from both players in this match.

I will comment until tomorrow if needed because is 101% clear that Unibet even if they want they can't do anything about the situation. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions , but when everybody is telling you that your opinion is not even close you should reconsider , take it as an advice it may help you in the future. 

---

@Livertool wrote:

---

@KenTouchMe wrote:

---

@Livertool wrote:

---

@KenTouchMe wrote:

Do you guys even know what staking means ? 

"The term poker staking, or simply staking, refers to the act of putting cash up on behalf of a poker player in the hopes that he or she wins. The person who puts the cash up is the backer."

It's like i borrow you money and you need to pay me back , in this case only if you win and only some percent.

How is Unibet responsible for anything ? They could investigate if there was like a "transfer" method between players (like it was or maybe still is on Stars) but there isn't , so as far as they know this could even be a lie , how would they know ? 

---

Did you read those 2+2 threads?

If they are actually true and he was high rolling on different games that he was suppose to while he said he can't afford to pay back. Or my personal favourite of victimising himself something like" bank loan interests are so high that he must pay them first and will pay as soon as he can afford" 

I did not read them , the term "staking" is enough. If that guy doesn't respect his promise or anything like that , the backer just did a bad investment. That's all that it is. If i borrow you money for whatever reason and you dont pay back will i call the bank to solve my bad investment ? 

No, you go to police if amount is big enough, you can prove it and you can't settle otherwise. If bank loans you money and you don't pay back, they just go:damn it, another bad investment? 

1. Banks have contracts 

2. He should go to the police then 

---

@Livertool wrote:

---

@KenTouchMe wrote:

Do you guys even know what staking means ? 

"The term poker staking, or simply staking, refers to the act of putting cash up on behalf of a poker player in the hopes that he or she wins. The person who puts the cash up is the backer."

It's like i borrow you money and you need to pay me back , in this case only if you win and only some percent.

How is Unibet responsible for anything ? They could investigate if there was like a "transfer" method between players (like it was or maybe still is on Stars) but there isn't , so as far as they know this could even be a lie , how would they know ? 

---

Did you read those 2+2 threads?

If they are actually true and he was high rolling on different games that he was suppose to while he said he can't afford to pay back. Or my personal favourite of victimising himself something like" bank loan interests are so high that he must pay them first and will pay as soon as he can afford" 

I did not read them , the term "staking" is enough. If that guy doesn't respect his promise or anything like that , the backer just did a bad investment. That's all that it is. If i borrow you money for whatever reason and you dont pay back will i call the bank to solve my bad investment ? 

Do you guys even know what staking means ? 

"The term poker staking, or simply staking, refers to the act of putting cash up on behalf of a poker player in the hopes that he or she wins. The person who puts the cash up is the backer."

It's like i borrow you money and you need to pay me back , in this case only if you win and only some percent.

How is Unibet responsible for anything ? They could investigate if there was like a "transfer" method between players (like it was or maybe still is on Stars) but there isn't , so as far as they know this could even be a lie , how would they know ? 

B. 21-22 games in total for this one.

If i could get the KO's from the last tournament that would be great