Leo-Unibet Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 Hi all,We have been running all MTT's with two different blind structures since launch last week.But after some investigation as well as feedback from players we decide to use the same blind structure for all our MTT's. This structure we chosen is quite flatter compare to the other one, this will give you much more playability in the tournaments.This means that the length and playability of a tournament from now only can variance based on number of chips and the level-up time.This will help all players to "get to know" the blind structure always used, our goal is that you in a few weeks will know it by heart :happy:The changes will take place over the next few days, Sunday majors that are up in the client right now will not have the changes until following Sunday.Below you find THE structure: LevelSmall BlindBig BlindAnte1153042204053255064306075408010650100127601201587515020910020025101252503011150300401220040050132505006014300600701535070085164008001001750010001251860012001501970014001752080016002002190018002252210002000250231200240030024140028003502516003200400261800360045027200040005002824004800600292800560070030320064008003136007200900324000800010003345009000112534500010000125035600012000150036700014000175037800016000200038900018000225039100002000025004012500250003125411500030000375042175003500043754320000400005000442250045000562545250005000062504630000600007500473500070000875048400008000010000495000010000012500506000012000015000517000014000017500528000016000020000531000002000002500054125000250000312505515000030000037500562000004000005000057250000500000625005830000060000075000594000008000001000006050000010000001250006160000012000001500006270000014000001750006380000016000002000006410000002000000250000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoreTBC Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 Can we have a homogeneous minimum starting stack too? There are 20 dailies and a Sunday major (based on the excel sheet I downloaded on the 2nd) that start with sub 70bb as a starking stack and of them 14 have 4 minute blinds, which IMO should be classed as hypers, not turbos.I checked the 'big 3' and their turbos come in at 5/6/6mins with hypers being 3 minutes (not sure if Party has hypers). No matter what the speed, they all start with at least 100bb.I can't see any reason in not have 100bb be the minimum starting stack for any MTT and possibly the 4 minute MTTs be reclassified as hypers with some being replaced with 6 minute turbos. Have you read my blog HERE... It's long isn't it :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoreTBC Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 In addition, the speed column in the client does not match the blind levels for various MTTs. Just now it has Turbo/Normal/Deep which doesn't make much sense as 'deep' doesn't really represent a speed, more of a starting stack. The client looks like the following for me just now (Times in BST):-20:30 - €1 Meteor Shower - Speed: Normal - Blind level: 8 mins - Starting Stack: 1500 (50bb)21:00 - €2 Singularity - Speed: Deep - Blind level: 6 mins - Starting Stack: 5000 (166bb)21:15 - €1 PLO Fireball - Speed: Turbo - Blind level: 4 mins - Starting Stack: 3000 (150bb) * has 10/20 structure21:30 - €2 Wormhole - Speed: Deep - Blind level: 4 mins - Starting Stack: 8000 (160bb) * has 25/50 structure22:00 - €2 Wormhole - Spped: Turbo - Blind level: 4 mins - Starting Stack: 3000 (100bb) It's very confusing. Have you read my blog HERE... It's long isn't it :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoreTBC Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 One more thing, is this structure inc. antes being used for PLO MTTs? Have you read my blog HERE... It's long isn't it :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeelsBadMan Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 I agree with @MoreTBC that classifying the 4 minute blind tournament as deep as it's speed is confusing. Was watching Onscreen and he was trying to find a turbo tournament to play but all he could find was deep ones, so he couldn't find anything to play, because he just didn't expect to have to click on every deep tournament to see if it's a turbo . He is probably pretty representative of how a recreational would interact with the software. They should probably be classified more by blind minutes rather than starting stack, or maybe by average duration of the tournament adjusted by field size.As for the blind structure I'm glad that this is becoming the standard on unibet. The transition between levels is great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtyMcFly Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 A homogenous blind structure is very welcome. Thanks.As an aside, I always used to hate the level that had blinds of 120/240, as I'm terrible at the 24 times table, so thanks for getting rid of that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoreTBC Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 @Leo-Unibet..Was there a specific reason to go with 12.5/13.33% antes instead of 10% for the early levels? Have you read my blog HERE... It's long isn't it :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeelsBadMan Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 All the levels seem to be almost in that range not just the early levels. The old structure was a bit weird having mostly 12.5% and then you would have a 10% level at certain blind levels like the 500 level for example. Consistency is nicer IMO :atisfied: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo-Unibet Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 @MoreTBC wrote:@Leo-Unibet..Was there a specific reason to go with 12.5/13.33% antes instead of 10% for the early levels?@MoreTBC I thought since the blind structure is rather flat I prefer a little more aggressiv ante configuration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leo-Unibet Posted October 12, 2017 Author Share Posted October 12, 2017 @MoreTBC wrote:One more thing, is this structure inc. antes being used for PLO MTTs?@MoreTBC No, PLO wil lrun without ante Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.