fish8one

@DaVitsche Thank you Sir ! The " range versus range "... :) Im gonna watch you on Twitch, GL ! @FeelsBadMan Do you need some..? :) Btw the link was put here twice, the statement 3 or 4 times... That sssooooooo many , right ? On 8 pages , i had to copy a few ( oh sorry, soo many times i mean, Dude)times, because no one bothered to get any answer... Till daVitsche˝s coment.. Thanks again GL to you all !

@Patric-Unibet It's all a math game, if the math adds up in the long run, you know that the RNG is working fine, if the numbers were lacking too much, you would know something is wrong. Of the 103 million-plus hands analyzed, the outcome was determined without a showdown in 75.7% of the hands, meaning no player at the table was able to see anything other than his or her own hole cards and whatever community cards had been dealt. Of the remaining 24.3% of hands that went to showdown, only 50.3% of those hands were ultimately won by the player who had been dealt the best five-card hand. In other words, in only about 12% of the hands analyzed did the player who had been dealt the best five-card hand actually go to showdown and win. https://www.pokernews.com/news/2009/03/cigital-study-players-skill-determines-holdem-outcome-1302.htm Could you help me understand how it is ok by math...?

@Patric-Unibet So for public only stuff like this can go: --Every card in every poker game is randomly dealt from a standard deck of 52 playing cards. Independent auditors regularly perform recognized statistical tests on the data files generated by our Random Number Generator --I'm not involved and therefore not exactly sure how the checks work, however I imagine they take statistics of millions of hands and compare the percentages with the actual. ( btw id love if this would be true , not just your imagination ) --So you have to trust us and the MGA on this because the exact procedures will not be made public for several understandable reasons. But that, if the concret hands played on any site (rng) was or was not tested, can not go public (btw for me a simple yes or no would not revailing the exact procedures )

@Patric-Unibet " Every card in every poker game is randomly dealt from a standard deck of 52 playing cards. Independent auditors regularly perform recognized statistical tests on the data files generated by our Random Number Generator to confirm that the cards are dealt randomly. " So, this ( your first post ) was based on what ground please...? Could you please find out from someone ( who is involved ), a simple YES or NO answer for my question, whic is : Do those agencies testing the actual hand history..?? thx,regards P:s:: I am 100% sure that nor you or anybody from any site would never say yes or no ..:)

@Patric-Unibet . Independent auditors regularly perform recognized statistical tests on the data files generated by our Random Number Generator to confirm that the cards are dealt randomly. What this means precilcely..? Testing the exact hand history..???? " Please understand that we would have no benefits whatsoever if we "rigged" the games. Poker players play against each other and not against us, so we have no benefits if a particular player wins or loses." R u sure..?!? LOOOL Please answer only my first question : is Unibet¨s hand history regurarly tested for statistical randomness...? Thx , regards

Dude, I feel interrogated. Why do you ask me all these questions, and then follow that up by questioning my answers? That’s super weird. What’s your point here? I think, I’m playing for longer than two years at Unibet, the forum didn’t exist from the beginning. But yeah, your other points might be correct, although I don’t think I cash out that much. I’m not keeping any records because I don’t know why I should. It’s not like I’m cashing out super serious money. It’s more like entertainment money to fund my other hobbies. Sometimes, I’m not playing for several weeks, due to being lazy. But sure, call me a winning regular. @GamesDean Hello Sir, I am sorry if you felt that way.. I just wanted to " translate " your result in numbers ( roughly ) to see your winrate... I was asking for yours and for that other player who also claimed that after first depo is just regular cash-outs (what for i am honestly happy for you guys ) To be honest the monthly volume in your " case " :), seems to me quite low for having monthly cash outs, but i do not want to argue about it with you, or doubt you at all.. Well done, good for you ! Do you make stream by any chance or any other way to see your play (even if is not free )...? I had a few coach in my past, mental as well :) Unfortunately my " tilt issue " is keep coming back and i just becomIng a proper rigtard..:) I played over a million cash-hands at Stars, and whenever i checked anything in my pt4 or hm2, ALWAYS was ok everything.. I remember that my" wonsd " was always around 57-58%... But still this article which i was refering ( with the wonsd 50-50 ),triggers me time to time back to tilting on " da rigged games "..:) Since april this year i am on Unibet( on that first depo still, 1 cash out only :) ),played approx 150-180k hands... there is nothing to check on ( hands , stats, anything)...sooo i think my accumulated tilt just got the best of me again :( Due to recent (3 months ) struggle on roll and limit...:) But now i would like to say that thank you guys for the conversations, i hope the best for every one of us at the tables and in life.. PEACE ! PS: sorry about my english, it is not my first language

Hi, Thank you for your time, lets see am i understood u correctly ( or close to :) ) " How is it possible then, that certain players – myself included – deposit money once and just keep cashing out? I’m not even running that good." " I cash out way too often to enjoy my winnings." " I tend to make a withdrawal when I want to buy something, e.g. a new computer." According to your words above , i think i should believe that u cash-out once a month (roughly), and lets say 300-500Eur... Is that correct..? " I’m playing 3 or 4 tables. ".. " I mainly play NL25/50/100 "..." I’m playing between 20 and 60 hours/month, I guess." Shall i take an average on that 20-60, and lets take it as 40hours/month ..? " I try to play with 30+ buy-ins per limit. However, sometimes I play with 15+ buy-ins when I know I could deposit if needed. So far, I didn’t need to. " I also don’t know how big my deposit was – man, that was years ago. Knowing myself, it wasn’t more than 100€, I think, 200€ tops." " I would like to think I’m better than the average player.." Your reg. date on this " forum " is gonna be 2years in december, shall i say that u played here approx 25-30 months ? How much equity I had is something a program called Equilab told me. I’m pretty sure, one of them had an inferior straight that had no chance of winning the pot. About the 99.7%...:) ( lets talk about this later ) First do you agree with my assumptions that : You are a constant winning reg here, playing 40hrs /month on average,mixing NL25/50/100( on NL50 at avr.) on 3.5 table (on average). Took money nearly every month, between 300-500 eur, started playing at Uni around 25-30 months ago with a first( and only) deposit for 150 Eur...?

My reg is not dutch..i did NOT use that word EVER...The " system error " was mentioned always that my message has " ook " and i need to remove it...LOL Thanks, i try now..

Hi, I cannot post.. I can not ask help ( tried 5times min), because as i write down (or copy) the reason ( system message ), it ending up the same WHAT IS O O K ? Jeez i could ask only if i leave spaces...LOL So what those 3 letters refer in any text, please..? P.S: I ve tried " google ", but the best i could think of that i can NOT " paste and copy" from other comments.??? Honestly this " forum " is so weird like the player pool, and the site in hole..LOL :) thx

On how many tables r u playing at NL25/50/100...? How many BI is ur roll..? How often u took money from Unibet, monthly , weekly..? How could you know that ur eguity was 99.7%, there is nothing on Uni to show that ? How could the other TWO have 0.3 % combined ( and went all-in with them LOL ) ? Am asking this to see whom i " chating " with...:) Regards,

@GamesDean " I got all the chips in with 99,7% equity to win once, against two players for an infinite chiplead. " wow...what where the holdings ( in your hand and villains) "How is it possible then, that certain players – myself included – deposit money once and just keep cashing out? I’m not even running that good. I had some terrible droughts but if you keep making good decisions, it will bear fruit." How much didi u deposit, what games u play, on what stake (BI), what is ur monthly volume and finally how˝s ur winrate ( ROI )

Ok, Just tell us plz, how many tables u playin in general, and how many hours (approx) per week...

Good on you ! May i ask how many hands r u playing / months...and how is ur roll now (after u took 500 ).. Just to see how is your winrate..:)

Hi, What do you think " believers ", out of 100 million life (true random) hands , lets say 25 mill would go showdown... How would look the winning percentage between worst and best starting hands...? 50-50 ?? Am i quessing correctly that the result would be 50-50, or...?

Hi, What do you think " believers ", out of 100 million life (true random) hands , lets say 25 mill would go showdown... How would look the winning percentage between worst and best starting hands...? 50-50 ?? Am i quessing correctly that the result would be 50-50, or...?

LOL u r right. I did not checked, and dunno why but i tought is round 4% :))... SO ANYWAY, CAN SOMEONE HELP ME UNDERSTAND WHY WAS THE RESULT 50-50 ( ROUGHLY ) ON THE SHOWDOWNS..?? THX

https://www.pokernews.com/news/2009/03/cigital-study-players-skill-determines-holdem-outcome-1302.htm

jeez..ok could have won by the worst hands in all non-showdown too...LOL The known fact is : 25MILL SHOWDOWN RESULT: 50-50 !!!!!!!!!!!!!! EXPLAIN how??????????? ONLY IF COINFLIPS WOULD BE ALL OF THEM ( IM SURE THAT˝S NOT DA CASE ) SO HOW THAN...? EXPLAIN PLEASE THE " KNOWN " FACT EVERY 2ND SHOWDOWN HAND WON THE WORST HAND....!!! HOW??? PLEASE DO NOT COMPARE THIS FACT WITH ANYTHING ELSE ( AS I DID NOT DO TOO ) JUST EXPLAIN THE MATH IN THIS FACT (KNOWN)

only 50.3% of those hands were ultimately won by the player who had been dealt the best five-card hand. EXPLAIN THIS SOMEBODY PLEASE !! BTW HITTING 2 OUTERS ON THE RIVER IS NOT 1:20...1:25 INSTEAD...TWICE IS NOT 1:400, 1:650 I THINK... BUT JUST PLEASE EXPLAIN MR MATH, THE RESULT OF THE ONE AND ONLY HAND HISTORY TEST EVER MADE ( NEVER WILL BE AGAIN ). HOW COULD ONLY EVERY SECOND TIME WON AT SHOWDOWN..?!? EVERY ( 25MIL.)HAND WAS 50-50 PREFLOP...??? LOL

Of the 103 million-plus hands analyzed, the outcome was determined without a showdown in 75.7% of the hands, meaning no player at the table was able to see anything other than his or her own hole cards and whatever community cards had been dealt. Of the remaining 24.3% of hands that went to showdown, only 50.3% of those hands were ultimately won by the player who had been dealt the best five-card hand. In other words, in only about 12% of the hands analyzed did the player who had been dealt the best five-card hand actually go to showdown and win.

Hi, What do you think " believers ", out of 100 million life (true random) hands , lets say 25 mill would go showdown... How would look the winning percentage between worst and best starting hands...? 50-50 ?? Am i quessing correctly that the result would be 50-50, or...?