Jump to content



Recommended Posts

Hello Everybody,

I wonder why with tennis when 2 players have both a high quote e.g.: player 1: 1.90 and player 2: 2.35 then its much more interesting to bet with those 2 high quotes than 2 players with a low quote, particularly if the gap between the 2 players is pretty  large, not?  What I must say is that starting from a quote of 1.50 the risk is higher (mostly from 45%-55%) but then its still quite obvious which player has more change to win the match , so then the so called 'risk' isn't correct, am I right?

I've also got a another question suppose I want to make 25 euro gain with betting on tennis a day.

Which of the following bet-combinations do you think is the best:

1 single-bet:   10 matches of x euro  with a quote of 1.50                                                         total invest x Euro

I've got to have at  6/10 bets correct in order to make gain not talking about the 25 euro. so it will take a lot of money to make a possible 25 euro gain.

or 1  combi of 2 matches  with a total quote of 3.5 so the invest is less and the profit is more but there's (more) risk

or 1 combi of 2 matches with a total quote of 2.5 so more invest and less profit but (less) risk


Thank you in advance!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Create New...