Jump to content

Kliedz_Zivju

Group: Pair
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Kliedz_Zivju

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Kliedz_Zivju's Achievements

Rank 7

Rank 7 (6/40)

  • Great Content
  • First Like
  • Popular Rare
  • First topic
  • First Reply

Recent Badges

242

Reputation

  1. this is super awsome 🙂 look forward too this 😛 TY TY... a tough choice between the bubble bursters and BANZAI!!! 🙂 ALL IN!!!!😍
  2. your happy thats fine. im worried... thats also fine, this is my blog were i moan all i want so im nit bothering stubbe all day. im happy for you too keep posting bringing my topic up but your waisting ya energy trying too show off your skill edge on me. ill see you at the tables :s my alias is moist_flops if we play the same stakes? i presume your a high stakes crusher from your superior levels and some years study.
  3. you dont even realise that im thinking about the bigger picture? you dont have a point? your just going on with yourself like you know better, when you show very little understanding of my point and only care about yourself... the point you are trying too make is realpy basic entry level theory.. im talking about a comletely different spot too you? and you dont even understand too make relevent comments :s @Estzeng
  4. @Estzeni understand what you are saying. you think all the MTT format should be slow and deep becuase poker is a game of skill and the skilled player should win all the money. you want the format too advantage you, who already has an edge... what im sugesting is this will lead too all the fun players not winning enough money too stick around and the games being boring. im sugesting that the formats should favor the bad players SOMETIMES so the weak players stick around. and dont go play at another client were the games are more "fun" i havnt said im a bad player and i want unibet too take the advantage from the skilled players. we just think differently. i think money is gained from bad players, you think its from your skill edge. im not even sugesting taking any MTT away, im sugesting "add more MTT". i cant do the math of "some years" im afraid. i dont even know what stakes you play too judge your skill level. study doesnt make you special it keeps you ahead of the learning curve. everbody does it...
  5. @Estzenim talking about bubbles and ladders, your talking about 100bb stacks and cash games.... one day i will know what? you dont even realise we not talking about the same thing. advise from me: if you play MTT study heads up and ICM before you study 100bb. if you think 100bb is were the skill is found then play cash game.
  6. @Estzenand your evidence is? 😄 ive lost track of what your point is to be honest. lets just agree too disagree
  7. @Stubbe-Unibet im not actually comparing it too the old structure, im just sugesting that having all the games the same flatt payout structure is boring
  8. @Estzen its irrelevent to my point anyway :S im happy too say mix it up abit all the deep, slow and flatt formats favor the tight players and the players with an "edge" i dont see all these turbos you mentioning :s nearly every game in the shedual has a big S? if you discount and satty or madness format. different levels 😄 ok
  9. cash is a completely different game too MTT poker i wouldnt mix the advice.... even the flat pay outs favor tight play. microstake winners can win because opponents are way too loose, but it actually just makes the game more skill dependant. < that is a load of waffle... i think you just over rate your "edge"
  10. i belive the oposite. i think varying blinds and differing stack sizes increases the skill requirement in terms of ICM, The major factor in MTT all slow blinds does is allow tight players too wait for a premium holding and exploit the recreational who call down too light vs large sizing. im not sayin NO SLOW DEEP GAMES. im saying a nice variety too please all player types will keep the pool dynamic atm it just feels STAGNENT....not just having all games how you like them personaly. this UOS was so boring format wise. it was awful im not putting myself out to play it next time if it will be them same. (i think uni maybe trying too apeal too the live players which cant play live ATM) and im not wrong? it deffinately suits tight players who can wait for premo holdings... you wont loose value from playing tight and aggresive vs call stations and weak players. you may miss a few spots but that will be over compinsated by bad calls vs your aggresion and that has nothing too do with the format of the MTT.
  11. @Leo-Unibet are we missing a 5 euro galaxy tonight? i randomly had a 2e galaxy omaha in my favirots. dunno if that is related
  12. i like the structures. more variety would be nice. atm each game feels like slow, deep stacks long blinds which is fine. i dont mind these games, it deffinatelty suits the tight players better then loose agrresive. some variety would be nice given the payout structures are already so flatt and pay out so many people. seems too also suit the tight players who sit and wait for premium rather then play the game 😛 the player pool i belive will grow too reflect this and the games will become more and more dry. unibet main pulling factor in the past was the wild aggresive player pool and the top heavy pay outs you could make a really decent ROI.
  13. what do i have too say for it too be counted as feedback? i tried a short answer. i tried a long rant and i have attempted a middle ground :s
  14. the blue moon im refering too the "mercury blue" if you didnt get the inside joke
×
×
  • Create New...