Jump to content

snufkins

Group: Pair
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About snufkins

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

snufkins's Achievements

Rank 4

Rank 4 (3/40)

  • First Like
  • Great Content
  • First Reply
  • First topic
  • One Year Anniversary

Recent Badges

13

Reputation

  1. Ok, I've never fully understood the division between CS and you guys in the community when it comes to inquiries on poker issues, but then I'll know for future reference.
  2. Hi again, just checking if there is any update on this? đŸ€” @Andy-Unibet @Stubbe-Unibet
  3. Hi @Andy-Unibet , I was playing some SnGs the other day and came across these two players that I strongly suspect was working as a pair. They actively avoided trying to eliminate each other and (rather obviously) made several chip dumping plays to balance each others stacks out when we played three handed. Here is just one example of clear chip dumping with the hand ID number attached if you would like to investigate the session further? No fun playing against these collusionistas. Thanks //Snufkins Spel #1832906979: Bord €10 SNG 5 Seat - 100.00/200.00 - No Limit Hold'Em - Total prissumma €47.50 - 23:14:21 2023/02/24 *** Antalet spelare *** Platser 1: ME (3170) Platser 2: rakosgeci (4840) Platser 5: Hindusan (1990) *** Blindar och knapp *** ME har knappen rakosgeci lĂ€gger lilla mörken 100 Hindusan lĂ€gger stora mörken 200 *** HĂ„lkort *** Dealt in rakosgeci Dealt in Hindusan Delat ut till ME [3h 5h] *** Innan flop *** ME lĂ€gger sig rakosgeci höjer 300 med 400 Hindusan höjer 400 med 600 rakosgeci lĂ€gger sig Hindusan vinner 1000 *** Sammanfattning *** Totalpot 1000 SĂ€te 2: rakosgeci: satsar 400 och vinner 0, nettoresultat: -400 SĂ€te 5: Hindusan: satsar 600 och vinner 1000, nettoresultat: 400
  4. Hi, would like to report following two named players below for possible collusion/chip dumping. I'm not sure but why fold another 78 when already raised 400 and lowstack is all-in with 478? And he was pretty loose in his calls against others.. Saw at least one other similiar hand between them earlier as well.. Spel #1668803633: Bord €10 SNG 5 Seat - 80.00/160.00 - No Limit Hold'Em - Total prissumma €47.50 - 20:07:49 2022/04/24 *** Antalet spelare *** Platser 1: Malle16 (478) Platser 2: Player 1 (1956) Platser 3: Player 2 (1780) Platser 4: Adaaa6 (3514) Platser 5: Player 3 (2272) *** Blindar och knapp *** Player 3 har knappen Malle16 lĂ€gger lilla mörken 80 Player 1 lĂ€gger stora mörken 160 *** HĂ„lkort *** Dealt in Malle16 Dealt in Player 1 Dealt in Player 2 Dealt in Adaaa6 Delat ut till Player 3 [8k 4h] *** Innan flop *** Player 2 lĂ€gger sig Adaaa6 höjer 400 med 400 Player 3 lĂ€gger sig Malle16 höjer 398 med 478, och Ă€r all-in Player 1 lĂ€gger sig Adaaa6 lĂ€gger sig Malle16 vinner 1038 *** Sammanfattning *** Totalpot 1038 SĂ€te 1: Malle16: satsar 478 och vinner 1038, nettoresultat: 560 SĂ€te 2: Player 1: satsar 160 och vinner 0, nettoresultat: -160 SĂ€te 4: Adaaa6: satsar 400 och vinner 0, nettoresultat: -400 @Stubbe-Unibet @Andy-Unibet
  5. As I understand it (or maybe I missed it) data/statistics for Sit n Go games are not avilable in the Game Lab thing, are there plans to inlcude SnG's there as well in the future?
  6. Hi, I haven't understood this thing either, other than that the sound thing scared the crap out of me first time it started in the lobby.. 😂 But am I right to assume that Swedish players cannot participate anyways, so no point learning how the point system work and so on?
  7. Hi Howlett, I'm not sure what you are asking. As poker players we can all relate to your arguments, without bad beats we'd all be millionaires by now đŸ€‘đŸ˜‰ but are you asking whether poker sites deliberately rig the games in favor of certain players, plays, situtations? Or are you asking if true random can really be generated artificially? I'm no mathematician or programmer or philosepher so have no idea. Maybe, maybe not đŸ€”đŸ€·â€â™‚ïž
  8. Okej great, glad to hear and that it was resolved quickly as well 👍 Yes I suspected more people reacted to them playing. Since it has been confirmed might as well post the names they used if anyone reads this and wondering whether they played against them last night. Villain 1 = MrMelk Villain 2 = AMCtoTH3moon
  9. Played one more game and same two players at the table, collusion probability definitely went up some %. They played completely different towards each other than against the rest of us although Villain 2 seems to be the worse player and got knocked out first while I ended up playing HU (and won 😁 👍) against Villain 1. Probably explains why Villain 1 was the one doing most of the chip dumping and Vaillain 2 the receiver. Anyways hope you can look into it to be sure. Good night for now
  10. Hi, Was recently playing a 10 euro SNG and is quite possitive that two players were playing together and definitely chip dumping. This time I'm not as 100% sure as last time (more like 92% sure) so I will not out their name in the examples below (or do you need the names to check?) But there were almost certainly chip dumping going on so if you could look into that I would appriciate it. I'll post three examples below, this happeded several times between Villain 1 and Villain 2... Spel #1489828590: Bord €10 SNG 5 Seat - 100.00/200.00 - No Limit Hold'Em - Total prissumma €47.50 - 22:40:52 2021/05/17 *** Antalet spelare *** Platser 2: Ump4Lump4 (1500) Platser 4: Villain 1 (6340) Platser 5: Villain 2 (2160) *** Blindar och knapp *** Ump4Lump4 har knappen Villain 1 lĂ€gger lilla mörken 100 Villain 2 lĂ€gger stora mörken 200 *** HĂ„lkort *** Dealt in Villain 1 Dealt in Villain 2 Delat ut till Ump4Lump4 [4s Jh] *** Innan flop *** Ump4Lump4 lĂ€gger sig Villain 1 höjer 400 med 500 Villain 2 höjer 600 med 800 Villain 1 höjer 600 med 1100 Villain 2 höjer 1360 med 2160, och Ă€r all-in Villain 1 lĂ€gger sig Villain 2 vinner 3260 *** Sammanfattning *** Totalpot 3260 SĂ€te 4: Villain 1: satsar 1100 och vinner 0, nettoresultat: -1100 SĂ€te 5: Villain 2: satsar 2160 och vinner 3260, nettoresultat: 1100 Spel #1489827912: Bord €10 SNG 5 Seat - 80.00/160.00 - No Limit Hold'Em - Total prissumma €47.50 - 22:39:24 2021/05/17 *** Antalet spelare *** Platser 1: Commodor3 (2620) Platser 2: Ump4Lump4 (1440) Platser 4: Villain 1 (3860) Platser 5: Villain 2 (2080) *** Blindar och knapp *** Ump4Lump4 har knappen Villain 1 lĂ€gger lilla mörken 80 Villain 2 lĂ€gger stora mörken 160 *** HĂ„lkort *** Dealt in Villain 1 Dealt in Villain 2 Dealt in Commodor3 Delat ut till Ump4Lump4 [5h Kk] *** Innan flop *** Commodor3 lĂ€gger sig Ump4Lump4 lĂ€gger sig Villain 1 höjer 240 med 320 Villain 2 höjer 320 med 480 Villain 1 lĂ€gger sig Villain 2 vinner 800 *** Sammanfattning *** Totalpot 800 SĂ€te 4: Villain 1: satsar 320 och vinner 0, nettoresultat: -320 SĂ€te 5: Villain 2: satsar 480 och vinner 800, nettoresultat: 320 Spel #1489826926: Bord €10 SNG 5 Seat - 80.00/160.00 - No Limit Hold'Em - Total prissumma €47.50 - 22:37:24 2021/05/17 *** Antalet spelare *** Platser 1: Commodor3 (2540) Platser 2: Ump4Lump4 (2080) Platser 4: Villain 1 (3620) Platser 5: Villain 2 (1760) *** Blindar och knapp *** Ump4Lump4 har knappen Villain 1 lĂ€gger lilla mörken 80 Villain 2 lĂ€gger stora mörken 160 *** HĂ„lkort *** Dealt in Villain 1 Dealt in Villain 2 Dealt in Commodor3 Delat ut till Ump4Lump4 [3k 2k] *** Innan flop *** Commodor3 lĂ€gger sig Ump4Lump4 lĂ€gger sig Villain 1 höjer 240 med 320 Villain 2 höjer 320 med 480 Villain 1 höjer 320 med 640 Villain 2 höjer 320 med 800 Villain 1 lĂ€gger sig Villain 2 vinner 1440 *** Sammanfattning *** Totalpot 1440 SĂ€te 4: Villain 1: satsar 640 och vinner 0, nettoresultat: -640 SĂ€te 5: Villain 2: satsar 800 och vinner 1440, nettoresultat: 640 @Stubbe-Unibet @Andy-Unibet //Ump4Lump4
  11. If one feels they've had a bad beat one can always think that loosing with quads is probably worse.. :laugh:
  12. Ah ok great, thanks for reply! Guess I was blind after all :laugh:
  13. Hi, Am I blind or is there no "sit out" button/box at the tables anymore? If one has to go take a leak during a session..
  14. Great stuff, glad to hear that. It is strange how they did not care about being obvious about their collusion. Don't know if they didn't know it is not allowed or if they just thought the rest of us is dumb enough not to notice. The hands I posted was just the most obvious examples, looking back at the game really everything they did had the strategy of working together to bleed the rest of us while shifting chips in between them both. Although I got really good hands that game it really made it impossible to play, although it was an interesting experience to see how much more difficult it was to play against two players working together. When I was the big chipleader early on I shifted focus to another table thinking they would knock each other out rather quickly given the way they were playing and just couldn't understand how the game could still be going on with blinds at 150-300. Now it makes more sence though đŸ€Ł Glad to hear they got suspended quickly though! 👍
×
×
  • Create New...