Jump to content

How RNG works?


psrquack

Recommended Posts

@WuDu, please refrain from trolling :)

 

It's isn't "articulating an opinion" as much as it's venting endlessly in a really silly fashion, not listening to any of the advise given.

The way the platform is built, your "choose what to read" is silly. Latest discussions is the key component. Fortunately, we'll soon have a brand new platform! :)

  • Like 1

Check the latest poker release notes. Have a look at our poker promotions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@WuDu You know that I am the enemy of censorship, but in my opinion these cases deserve a short break - I would not treat this as a ban but 2 weeks of rest :)

How about this case?

omaha_player.png.333170944fc8498b097db0791bdbbf65.png

Using invectives in relation to other players.

'STOP PLAYING ...", but he/she still plays and pastes screenshots one by one trying to prove something.

Will we agree that it is a 100% ban? :Cool:

@Stubbe-Unibet I think these threads should be invisible :Smirk:

  • Like 1
"Small opportunities are often the beginning of great enterprises."
Link to comment
Share on other sites


@Livertool wrote:

@Stubbe-Unibet wrote:

 Fortunately, we'll soon have a brand new platform! :)


Don't speak until you are spoken platform? Don't expect to hear my name often 🤣

 


Not quite ;) perhaps @ReCorpH can send you a pm with some details. Will basically be less of an issue -take up the full list almost - if someone goes all crazy and makes 5 "I LOST, IT MUST BE RIGGED" posts in a matter of minutes.

  • Like 1

Check the latest poker release notes. Have a look at our poker promotions

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@WuDu wrote:


@GR1ZZL3R wrote:

Tut tut @WuDu using sarcasm, don't you know it's the lowest form of wit and I have been severely criticised for using it. Discussion is all well and good but when unbelievers refuse to accept any arguments against their pet theories and then start name calling and, in one case, accusing me of calling them stupid and ill educated when I had done no such thing, it goes beyond discussion and just turns into endless back and forth name calling


 

Goodness gracious, he was such a meanie! 

That never occurred to me, I simply thought he was resorting to name calling and making things up because he was running out of arguments, the typical  resort of people that can't conduct a proper debate. Actually I won't discuss further what anyone has or has not done while they're not here to answer for themselves, a courtesy I extended to you while you were temporarily unavailable for comment. 👼

@GR1ZZL3R, I hope you recovered quickly from this traumatic experience!

Thankyou for your expression of sympathy but I don't think it's really needed. More pressing matters diverted my attention this week, a blocked kitchen sink, a faulty boiler, and a truly traumatic run of bad results on the gee-gees. Two have been sorted, the third is still occupying some of my time.

If only there were a way to stop talking to people you don't want to talk to.Up until we discover and master such an advanced technology,banning heretics like @OliD is the only way to go. 

I'm not sure I'm a fan of banning, from what I see it tends to reinforce the victimisation culture in certain types and can make them even more vocal, misunderstanding the reasons for a ban. The problem with most types of conspiracy theorists ( and no, Olid did not say this was a conspiracy, I'm speaking in general) is that any evidence or arguments against are treated as part of the conspiracy, and a ban only serves to reinforce the belief that they are on to something, when the ban is usually imposed because of the way they present their case rather than the case itself. 

 

 

 


 

"It turns out that 75% of all poker players think they play better than the other 75%."     image.png.99a4e82708d54abfc527324e8836768e.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@WuDu wrote:


Wise decision, @Stubbe-Unibet! You are right, how dare @OliD articulate his opinion on a public forum? Especially if it's not the majority opinion? This alone is a terrible thought crime in itself, but he even posted in and thus hijacked the topics he created himself. Unforgivable.This community is built on valuable posts, how dare he write about bad beats and being "0lucky"?Now, grown mean should be able to choose which posts to read and which posts to answer to, however due to the lack of grown men posting here, @Stubbe-Unibet knows that he has to sacrifice his time and energy and make these decisions for us. Thank you for that!

 

9f3f8c517f77b997c9b48660ec1df414.png.90f994c1f83db0c67e486e95f4b1fd1d.png

 

 


 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ff99607e6b71a87fc5d6a98a5b2bfcb0

#FreeOliD

#OliDsLifeMatters

  • Like 2
We're gonna win on so many levels! We're gonna win, win, win. You're gonna get so tired of winning, you're gonna say: "Mr. President please, we don't wanna win anymore, it's too much!" And I'm gonna say: "I'm sorry, we're gonna keep winning because we're gonna make America great again!"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 


@Argevolen wrote:

#FreeOliD

#OliDsLifeMatters


@Argevolen @WuDu you don't see the difference between freedom of speech and making claims that the company is engaging in illegal activities (as far as I know it is punishable (by the law) in most places in the world :Happy:) - with no evidence, just showing up screenshots of losing hands - over and over again. You are still on the company's communication platform, and the thread has been active for a long time without intervention - so I don't really see any attack here - or rather caring for a given person and giving them time to think about certain things :)

these are not ideological, historical or political issues - here we are dealing rather with the issue 2+2=5,5 :) I personally would like to check the knowledge of these people in the theory of probability - I assume that when someone turned 18, she/he had it at school :Cool:

  • Like 2
"Small opportunities are often the beginning of great enterprises."
Link to comment
Share on other sites


@pinki wrote:

 


@Argevolen wrote:

#FreeOliD

#OliDsLifeMatters


 I personally would like to check the knowledge of these people in the theory of probability - I assume that when someone turned 18, she/he had it at school :Cool:


Well he was upset of casino too thou gameplay was pretty much steady with rtp. But there was couple of glitch spins in game and he was sure those were spins that should have given bonus :Rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi Stubbe


"i lost, it must be rigged" is exactly NOT what I said but thanks for incorrectly and somewhat unfairly infantalising some honest and genuine observations. My comments where made over a matter of at least a week, not "minutes", and my points seemed to have gained more traction than you would have liked. Sorry about that. With all due respect, can I suggest that if you are to go to the lengths of banning someone for speaking their mind, you don't then ridicule them in their enforced absence? It looks bad, even worse than my raising initial discussions. As for dominating your precious threads, I can only apologise again but query why I was awarded "medals" for starting discussions but then penalised when they were deemed not to your liking. 

I won't be posting anymore as I see little point in debating with those who dislike, villify and punish opinions other than their own. I'm not "crazy" and would prefer if, in my continued absence from the forum you would refrain from ridiculing myself and others' opinion by calling into question my/their state of mental health. It's not fair, funny or smart or in fact conducive to any healthy and balanced conversation. It is also in direct contradiction of your own terms of service and should I have done the same I have no doubt I would be permanently banned. It's a good job I have never stooped to such levels.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Like 1
We're gonna win on so many levels! We're gonna win, win, win. You're gonna get so tired of winning, you're gonna say: "Mr. President please, we don't wanna win anymore, it's too much!" And I'm gonna say: "I'm sorry, we're gonna keep winning because we're gonna make America great again!"
Link to comment
Share on other sites


@pinki wrote:

 


@Argevolen wrote:

#FreeOliD

#OliDsLifeMatters


@Argevolen @WuDu you don't see the difference between freedom of speech and making claims that the company is engaging in illegal activities (as far as I know it is punishable (by the law) in most places in the world :Happy:) - with no evidence, just showing up screenshots of losing hands - over and over again. You are still on the company's communication platform, and the thread has been active for a long time without intervention - so I don't really see any attack here - or rather caring for a given person and giving them time to think about certain things :)

these are not ideological, historical or political issues - here we are dealing rather with the issue 2+2=5,5 :) I personally would like to check the knowledge of these people in the theory of probability - I assume that when someone turned 18, she/he had it at school :Cool:


@pinki maybe u are right, i should have learn, but i did not so well as you i quess...what a theory of probability has to do with unibet using

house bots or not.., could at least explain this in deatail?

BUT! One thing i learned much earlier than to turning 18, it was that if i say something in a discussion (arguement)which is "obvious" to me

but the other person ask me to specify....than i got 2 choices... 

1. tell my "obvoius facts" in details..

2. the rest is BS..(sry)

P:S::

I had several post before in similar way i know, only once i get correct answer with facts..was by DaVitsche.."range vs range"..

I DID understand it ,thanked it honestly and STOPPED my accusation on that subject...

Peace,

P:S::sry about my english

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@fish8one You can stop trying to get me into this thought process. From post to post, comment after comment, I begin to visualize You in my head :wonder: In suitcase you have hard evidence and we'll all see it with our own eyes soon 👍

wdzianko.thumb.png.ebd2086cd0c3f6b901623816cd8e1cfe.png

  • Like 1
"Small opportunities are often the beginning of great enterprises."
Link to comment
Share on other sites


@fish8one wrote:


@pinki wrote:

 


@@

@@ @


@@

P:s::

I had several post before in similar way i know, only once i get correct answer with facts..was by DaVitsche.."range vs range"..

I DID understand it ,thanked it honestly and STOPPED my accusation on that subject...

Peace,

P:s::sry about my english

 

 

 

 


You can also use your own time to for example google how rng works, ranges, poker in general or what ever you want to know and not to expect that someone uses their own time to explain everything to you in order you to feel that some software ain't rigged. Lot of sources around wonderfull thingy called internet and what even better, they are free. All it takes is some effort and time 😉

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thx,trust me i tried to find those "obvious leaks", but unfortunately i could not..

Therefore i was looking forward to héar from pinki

Could You point out a few links,for the quaranteed randomness and botfree sites from relaible source,like regulators or independent auditors..?

Would highly appreciated..🆒

The best i could find was disclaimers regarding any quarantee for 100% randomness and fairness.

@Moderators

Anyway, can i get a 1 month ban from the forum and the forum only please...

Thank You all for your help an patience!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another suggestion: stop wasting your time with something you can't find. Trust me, the day there is leak you don't have to search for it, it is all over the place.

As far as i know, computer generated rng is 100% random. But there to be massive ❤️♥️❤️ over rng, i don't believe. There is always weak link and over 20 years of internet poker, someone would have spoken.

Having said that, i reserve my right to believe in conspiracy and yell rigged when i get bad beats :laugh:

Other than that i don't see this thread going anywhere. Even if unibet and regulators are scamming us, do you think they tell when asked? 😏 I just see you guys wasting your time on nonsense. Better to do something totally different than poker if you are sure you are being hustled.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...