OliD

Hi, I know I said I wouldn't post on this matter anymore but the last hour and half's play on your poker site proves just why I intend to take my custom elsewhere. I frankly don't care what the usual suspects have to say, this is to warn the wider community, those who don't know and are yet to discover exactly what they are dealing with when playing at Unibet. I stress this is from 90 mins of play, with tickets only, not cash and the run outs are IMO total bull. I can take (multiple) bad beats, I realise it's a big part of the game, I play thousands of hands a week with Unibet exclusively, I grind almost daily to earn tickets and aspire to win a decent prize with them and have had great success winning tickets but when I comes down to the pinch point of finally hitting it big it simply doesn't happen. I've posted some hands below. This isn't a reasonable for a single 90 min session. The first three are from daily small regular satty, whatever. The fourth, having invested 0r1a in the uk tour 5 tickets gtd, right on the bubble. Just look at that runout AKh vs J3o!? The last two are from tonight's uk tour €50 final, in which I took an initial table lead (which the software clearly didn't like) and ultimately cost me the dearest ticket in my account. This is all after I bubbled the €250 tourney for the €1100 target tourney, 10tickets gtd (11th/37) last week. So you see, I'm not as numpty as you might assume, I do play my hands well (not perfectly, clearly) and research and act on relevant spots but when results occur in this fashion, I can only assume that it just ain't right. You talk about protecting the recs, but all I ever see are the same names, every day, on your site winnning almost every hand they play, with THE wierdest hands and plays. It also easy to hide behind and deflect any Honest observations via sample size and variance but to clarify, this nonsense never happens in my favour because guess what, I don't shove 810os or j3os that regularly for tourney life cos yes, they are statically far less likely to win, even in multi-way pots - that is unless you play Unibet. Once I've burned my final few tickets, I'm off to GG. You can keep your transient donkeys. Good riddance.

Great hashtags, you're the best

hi Stubbe "i lost, it must be rigged" is exactly NOT what I said but thanks for incorrectly and somewhat unfairly infantalising some honest and genuine observations. My comments where made over a matter of at least a week, not "minutes", and my points seemed to have gained more traction than you would have liked. Sorry about that. With all due respect, can I suggest that if you are to go to the lengths of banning someone for speaking their mind, you don't then ridicule them in their enforced absence? It looks bad, even worse than my raising initial discussions. As for dominating your precious threads, I can only apologise again but query why I was awarded "medals" for starting discussions but then penalised when they were deemed not to your liking. I won't be posting anymore as I see little point in debating with those who dislike, villify and punish opinions other than their own. I'm not "crazy" and would prefer if, in my continued absence from the forum you would refrain from ridiculing myself and others' opinion by calling into question my/their state of mental health. It's not fair, funny or smart or in fact conducive to any healthy and balanced conversation. It is also in direct contradiction of your own terms of service and should I have done the same I have no doubt I would be permanently banned. It's a good job I have never stooped to such levels.

Not blaming anyone Cris, I could have played some aforementioned hands better and some worse but that fact doesn't support frequency of crazy bull❤️♥️❤️ run outs you see here. Quite why that happens is for the site's diminishing base to establish. Anyway, ultimately it simply adds to the fun. That is until your are teamed up on by the usual suspects for poking your head above the parapet occasionally to make some genuine observations - not to be confused with putting your hand up in class saying "teacher I just don't understand."

Obv aqh is not top 4 hands, I was reflecting your own sarcasm, so please refrain from rubbishing a fair chance of winning whilst devoting yourself to supporting such a horrendous play, and odds. How can you trap a player when you are are allin already. 34os allin on flop vs a hand with 82% equity is actually more akin to jumping off a cliff rather than setting a cunnning trap. Yeah you might survive the fall but why do it, because you've have a glass of vino or two, as stubbe suggests? Anyways trapping would involve betting action before and after your victims bet? You can't bet again if your already allin, with 5% odds of winning. Him being allin on the flop and consecutively hitting 2 of the only 6 outs he could possibly win with, on both subsequent streets might seem rational to you, but to me and no doubt others who wouldn't wish to admit it here, it doesn't. Neither does you narrative that you are the genius and everyone else who dares say something you disagree with is in some way stupid or ill educated.

Yeah right, he puts 85% of his chips into a 4 bet pot and expects to bluff with his remaining equity. doh!

Why didn't I think of that? How clever you are. Because I only EVER play top premium hands. Thats right, I spend my sessions waiting for the top 4 hands, because that's really exciting, and constantly play them like I might actually be ahead, so stupid of me. I would never play a hand that my opponent wouldn't expect me to. Trapping is truly an unfamiliar concept to me, I never EVER do that, that defeats the point of the game doesn't it. Silly me. And I would never ever play un/suited connectors or any pp other than AA. I'm THAT transparent. sarcasm is the lowest form of wit and really not the highest form of intelligence but I thought I'd try and match you like for like. ✌️ 34o at any point in that hand is pure Bozo Donk. I not surprised you disagree.

You are in my Hall of Fame btw, nice one

Ok. Why would you think I would fold the remaining 25% of my stack when I 4 bet you pre flop, did you imagine I had 23os vs your 34os? Honestly, what did you put me on? You were going to bluff me off with only 20% equity of the pot? You got some studying to do brother. Hope it was worth it for you, certainly gave me a laugh. Did you get your ticket in the end, or try a horrendous bluff on somebody else and lose?

And surely no one who goes to the length of actually wanting to play poker would chase a hand which 95 times in 100 he will lose?

Sorry stubbe but nothing you have said explains this scenario. It may well have made (3) terrible calls preflop and then another on the flop but the fact the turn and river both favour that to such a precise degree leaves little reasonable doubt in my mind and even less excuses for both that player and yourself! Just yet another case of a villains 5% chance of winning on the flop providing him with consective outs in the deck, literally against all the odds. My odds of winning on that flop vs his?! As for what I do in my spare time, I believe it's still just about a free world with free will, so I can spend it however I like, no? I'm not losing any money and so it proves to be quite amusing to me, the lengths some entities will go to to make a quick buck.

It's absolutely not the £5 loss I have issue with anyway, if you had read my casino post properly before throwing personal insults you would realise that. Anyway by the look of your profile, You are the one who spends a wholly unreasonable amount of time here.

I'm a dam site healthier than you, Dr Phil

Excuse me?

Hi All, Thought I'd get some opinion on this outrageous hand. I sit in BB with AQh. 6 players flat call 100chips so I raise to 600 in order to induce the small stack and isolate. Small stack K8h does as I intend and hope for, going Allin. Others fold. CO then finds himself in a position to call an additional 14bb having only flat called, with 34o. He calls (?!!). Fair enough I suppose? I'm sure to have him beat at this point so 4 bet to further isolate him. He calls again, with 34os, hmmmmm. Flop comes, I have top pair + top kicker with heart flush still live. K8 is almost dead and CO has nothing with the flop. I go Allin - CO CALLS - with fecking 34os, on that board!! He hits the Turn (ok then, here we go again I say, not really believing what might come next). Yep you got it, another 4 on the river. He wins, with possible one of THE worst hands Pre, Post Flop and arguably the Turn. The only thing I can possible think possessed it to play this way throughout the hand is because it is aware that, as the slightly bigger stack with two players allin, even with the worst possible hand, it knows the software will reward him on the river, as this seems to be a characteristic, time and again. Someone got the odds on each street for this please?

Hi all, Just wanted to point out what a bogus casino you appear to run. Leprechauns riches are clearly near impossible to find. 624 spins, not a single bonus round, over £130 spent, in 20c and 40c spins not a SINGLE bonus round. I did however notice a number of times where the software occasionally glitched and paused mid spin for like 5 seconds or more, I suspect these were the few times I could have been awarded bonus rounds but guess what, not even a single cent win once the reels had finally settled. lose only £5 total after all that, but Jesus Christ Unibet what on earth are you playing at?! Over 600 spins and not one measly bonus? The widely circulated rumours online are clearly true, you really are the most pathetic and miserly online casino.won't be playing on your software again a hurry and I suggest others do the same, i mean there is clearly no point!

So who is the mystery player who is able to register when no one else is able, a glitch in the matrix?

Hi, logged in this morning to play some qualifiers and came accross two tourneys, €5 to €25 ticket and 50c to €2 UOs ticket, in which only one player was registered. Tried to reg to these tourneys while late reg was available and tournaments were "not found" yet were showing in the main lobby. When I tried to access tourney lobby, info, including player name, would not load. Why are Unibet running tourneys in which only one anonymous "player" can reg and win the only prize? You will note the tourneys are still showing as "running" not "ran for."

Hi Andy, many thanks for that. oli

Hi, any chance of a response please?

Hi, I am currently playing the 6ticket gtd UK Tour rebuy and when I bought an add on the system has used one of my two generic MTT tickets rather than one of my ten UK Tour €1 tickets. please can this €1MTT ticket be refunded? I feel that one of my specific tickets should have been used for this same specific tournament and I feel a bit shortchanged. many thanks

Hi Grizzler, thank you for your peculiar response. You query why nobody has answered my initial question and yet you fail to see the response from mod agreeing that 7 for 13 in the space of five minutes would seem high. You then go on to agree yourself that I witnessed what I did. I concede that nobody other than the usual cast of site defenders have responded to my public post but I reason that to be because, as has always happened here, genuine queries are come down on hard like a ton a bricks, by the same people with the same justifications - you know nothing, sample size is too small, the system is infallible. Like I said to stubbe, I get that, certain people have a vested interest in downplaying such theories to maintain their own existence. You however, have still not answered my subsequent question, are you affiliated to Unibet? I am not commenting on the odds of seeing such things patterns over the infinitesimal long run because I only wish to sit and play a reasonable deal for a single session, perhaps two, per day, yet I do understand the odds of such events are calculated over the long run. However surely the purpose of RNG is to ensure a perpetually random outcome rather than pilling in all the same type of flops into a short period of time ergo, self defeating. I understand that if you wait long enough for example a random generator will produce a numerically ascending sequence of 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 but to witness this more than even once in a short period may suggest something doesn't work quite as it should. Why it should behave this way would be a matter for the propiertor, hence my raising it within this forum but again I sense any responsibility would easily be offloaded to a third party such as the certifier. Don't get me wrong I enjoy playing at Unibet and I hope to see you at the tables one day, perhaps even in person at an event so I can apologise to you for your taking offence to some of my earlier remarks. For me it's really not personal but I have to confess it feels like it's taken pretty personally by others.

No, again you are missing the point. It's not related to hands in which I necessarily played. It's related to all flops at tables and tourneys I play and witness, regardless of whether I play the hand or not. It's not that I feel I am being punished personally, that would of course be ridiculous, and by your own terms, illegal - other "players" also have to play these boards, some more than me as I may have already chosen to fold pre flop. Again, like I have said on multiple occasions tonight alone, I understand my sample size of 13 is very very very very small but realised I couldn't even begin to make a point without listing actual hands from an actual tourney played in, for fear of being ridiculed by the usual crowd just waiting in the wings such as Livertool and Grizzler (again, this is not some miscomprehension that they would wish to ridicule me personally, as I have witnessed the same characters, whose motives remain questionable, questioning and outright denying the legitimate observations of many many of your own customers over the years). Even you own chum acknowledges that four paired flops in a row and 7 for 13 is high but not statistically impossible. fair enough, but to put this down to variance rather than the behaviour of your fully certified RNG seems odd. After all, the sole purpose of this mechanism is to present the cards in a fully randomised order, so to have glaringly blatant patterns such as we are discussing seems entirely contradictory. Do you actually disagree with the interpetation of variance at the top of my previous post? Poker is a complicated subject I grant you but I assure you I haven't perceived there to be an anomalous quantity of paired flops, it's a witnessed reality, the borders of both beasts being perfectly clear to me.

In poker, variance is the measure of uncertainty. A play that has high variance has a great deal of uncertainty. A play that has a relatively certain outcome has a low variance. ... Variance is important for the poker player because it quantifies the notions of upswing and downswing. My comments were relating to the unlikelihood of been DEALT paired flops, ie the famous not-so-RNG, not the variance of upswing or downswing of my subsequent resulting losses or profits, both of which are negligible, perhaps a result of the equally famous theory of Equitable Distribution. Are you honestly going to deny the use of algorithms in computer based industry, some such could easily be written, by man, to behave however they commanded? Get a grip Grizzler and then please get a life, outside the remit of kissing fake ass.

I know what I saw and I say what I see.