Jump to content

bctrips

Group: Pair
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bctrips

  1. Hi, @Wizard @Stubbe-Unibet so i don't really agree that bootcamps are bad and attract nitty regs, i would say its quite the opposite, atleast on NL200/400. In my experience ( 2M+ hands NL200 & NL400 last 4 years on unibet) during bootcamps there are always a few regs including myself sometimes lol, playing way out of line, trying to VPIP to many hands especially butons, too many tables and chasing rewards, playing for too long and spewing etc. Therefore traffic is always great during bootcamps, alot of table starting, many tables usually run just regs without recreationals--pokersites dreams :). The promo itself is designed to encourage volume and looser play, it makes sense if you see how some points are given: -Reach the flop with at least three other players -Reach the flop in two consecutive hands -Play a hand for the button and win or split the pot -Be dealt a straight flush I understand some people don't play much, or mix stakes and can't win alot if anything from bootcamp, but thats how most promos work. Of course someone working more and risking more is gona be rewarded more. Even if we have promo like random prize drops, someone that plays more is going to have better chances of getting prizes, thats just how it works. No promotion is perfect, i agree that there are downsides like if you play stake in between like nl200, its harder to compete vs guys who play nl400 only. And the recs are unlikely to make payouts. But if we care for recs, what do we think its best for them, if they play during bootcamps against like 50 players in pool, who are playing poor in general, making alot of mistakes, or is better without bootcamps, lower rewards, where everyone plays less tables, focused, primarily targeting recs only ? Isn't that way worse for games/recs ? If we keep lowering RB, rewards and even promos that encourage higher volume and rb play, then longterm its very likely traffic will fall alot, and tables will run only around recreationals like on most main sites, well atleast legit ones. Games are getting tougher and tougher every day so why else would regs play eachother only on many tables, if not for good rewards/promos. And im afraid promos like "rake 7000 get 350" won't be enough . Love it or hate it, i would say bootcamp is probably the best and most successful promo for what is supposed to do-encourage volume and looser play.
  2. my bonus was not removed actually
  3. Hi, please remove my "rake x get y" bonus.
  4. hi, please remove my rake 9250 get 463 bonus.
  5. So wining/loosing in what time span ?Thats quite important i think. What if due to variance someone is crushing lets say first half year and then getting destroyed or BE next half ? Also some loosing/BE player can also have like 3 great months in a row, but loosing /BE overall through year, does that mean he would get the lowest bonuses in this good runs ? In my experience, for my latest bonus i played on avg at least 6h every single day for 14days multitabling 8+ and i barelly made it. Now with current setup even though its stressfull im still happy because its nice additional value on top of nice loyalty and its fine if you occasionally choose to complete it and im sure its good for traffic. To have it integrated as part of loyalty i don't like it as much because that would mean constant stressing and "forced" playing for mostly arround the same loyalty rewards as now. As you said you expect to optimise/make alot of changes so if you decrease requirement of this bonuses for like 30%, that would be different much better, i really can't imagine many players playing constantly for 14days every day 5-6h+ without breaks, holidays, geting sick, family things... Imo for something that is part of loyalty its just too brutal that you can't afford to have day offs, especially if you start running very bad. And marginal winners /BE players are experiencing the toughest swings so im not really sure how effective this strategy of helping them will be. Its like giving someone chance of 65% rb but very hard to realize it in practice, at least if you want to stay sane πŸ˜„ But then again i do understand this from the bussiness/marketing point of view.
  6. Hi, can you please cancel my rake 9750 get 488 bonus. I played quite alot and have to agree something like rake 14k in 2weeks is unfortunatelly super tough and very traffic dependable actually everything 10k+ in 2weeks is very hard. So we have to be a bit more realistic for the upcoming setups and i see you already made some changesπŸ™‚ Also i think bonuses are good for traffic, but it has to be worth it and 5% might be questionable i think no matter how well player is doing. Especially if 5% bonus targets are players with better results i don't think many will accept bonuses like 9750-488, 8000-400, Its probably not worth pushing yourself much more and add extra stress/deadlines just to get 5% which is like 1BI. If its just little more effort invested, like idk 6300k-315 then ok great for some, but to push yourself should be more reasonable risk : reward at least 10%. So if possible i would suggest if we now have 5%- 30% maybe instead we have 10%-25% in future setups? Or something similar just so that min is 10%. I cant imagine anyone getting 20% or 25% canceling bonus because its not 5% more, but 5% and 10% is quite different (cancel right away or chase difference). Im curious what everyone else think ? Do u agree, or not ? πŸ™‚
  7. Would be interesting to know the number how much more volume was played/rake paid because of this bonuses wouldn't be surprised if 500k was great investment πŸ™‚ I think paying 70%+rb is exactlly the reason you have many high-volume players and excellent traffic (compared to previous years). About loyalty cut, what about players who now rarely get this bonuses ? Would that mean they would still get bonuses rarely and on top of that also cut from loyalty ?
  8. i like both current and modern version.
  9. Most (if not all ? ) affiliates also removed their unibet leaderboards/rewards from august on because of Kindred decision to change affiliate deals. At the time was thinking its cool that atleast we have these bonuses (besides good loyalty system and promos). So quite bad news now 😞 idk i think its pretty big change for more consistent/higher volume players
  10. Unibet has by far the coolest gifs/emojis imo πŸ˜„ the one with fish is just perfect lol always makes me laugh
  11. @Samba i don't think its always 20% i also got both 10% and 20% before. I don't think its specified "why" certain % maybe random or maybe because of other promos πŸ™‚
  12. Configurations ExamplesNumber of Chips 5000 or 10000Level up time 8Bounty YES/NO NOFormat Freeze or Re-entry (one or multi) or R/A up to 3 Re-entryPlayer per table 6 or 9 9 or 6Buyin €50+Preferred start time CET 19.00-20:30
  13. Don't have anything against zoom but i personally don't think that would be a good idea, splitting pools for no reason. And unibet is uniqe site, far from from falling behind lol, just look at the trafic and compare it to other sites. Doing very well especially on higher limits.
  14. I love this bonuses, gives me that extra motivation to play more. Great work @Stubbe-Unibet ! Are they easy to clear ? of course not, but its suposed to be a challenge not a gift πŸ™‚
×
×
  • Create New...