Jump to content

VikingsAF

Group: 72
  • Posts

    0
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by VikingsAF

  1. I feel a bit sad that I didn't get a mention @Stubbe-Unibet but I will forgive you. I always do have plenty of awesome idea's to improve and innovate Unibet, so if you want to hear them, just mail me or we could skype or so, as I won't be able to play on Unibet anymore from february and going forward. Thanks for the tag @psrquack
  2. Woohoo @Patric-Unibet you're the best!!
  3. Ok, I didn`t know that. But 21 players and 42 places paid :wonder: I was joking. I actually think it went like this. Santa asked Leo to set-up the same games all sundays of december, but he forgot that the 30th is a sunday as well. Lucky for the players who couldn't participate the previous games... But it shouldn't have happened Edit: Time travel for @GR1ZZL3R
  4. This game is just for the players who couldn't play any of the previous. :) You had your part
  5. Great challenge. Not sure if it's because you played on 1 euro level, but this shows how hard it is to make profit in these kind of games :) Sad that I posted later :p (and that I didn't round up :D)
  6. @StarKebap You can't change packages into bonus points. Only if you win them trough challenges and you have a fair reason to why you can't make it.
  7. It has been a while since I commented here (as I feel like it's useless to try and give input to someone who is much better than you ;)) But I've been reading the blog once in a while. I know guessing isn't allowed yet. But just gonna do it anyway because I'm a rebel. 107,5 will be your end result. So 7,5 profit. (Since you'll be playing 85 1,5 multipliers)
  8. 1. It's not just so simple... But I agree it isn't that complex either. I don't know what the dev capacity at Relax is (they could hire me in 2 months if they wanted :p) On the other hand I don't think the reason for removing it was that it used too much time ;) It is rather that they tought it wasn't profitable and good for thesatellite tree (poeple hording tickets keep money out of the flow) 3. They shouldn't change 5 to 6 or 9, but rather add an extra SNG type with a bit more players. As I mentioned. 8 with 3 paid has about the same variance as 5 with 2 paid :) I also do agree that the Live Event team (mainly the UO team) isn't working to well. UK tour and Deepstack Open can announce everything (except maybe their last stop) in januari or february the latest... Why is it so hard for the UO team to do the same? It can not be a problem to organise this kind of stuff a year in advance. (Also here, I wouldn't mind if they hired me :p Got some managment skills, altough I'm still a junior) And finally in reaction to everyone else talking about the kindness of the company being gone? That's (I think) a direction that Unibet/Kindred chose as a whole. I don't think the poker lead can change anything about that :)
  9. Yeah thats true. But on the other hand. If I would be a big stack right on the bubble. I would insta click it with anything less than QQ because I know myself. Going from 1st to bubbling :) But indeed. The checks will show
  10. @triceraatopp If you have "fold to any bet" selected that happens automaticaly without keeping in mind that it's "only" 299 chips.
  11. @testuser1 cool seeing you coming back (maybe) One thing I do agree with which got already mentioned is flatter payouts for rakeback and promotional events. (Like the 3k and 1k monthly freeroll. It's super annoying that it's the same 12% getting paid as in normal tournaments, while it should be rakeback, but also twitch freerolls and so on. They went the right way tough with some of them by changing payouts to tickets instead of cash) Then the other thing Unibet stands out for are the live events... Unibet needs a far more unified system. There isn't as much trafic as on other big poker sites that you can have all kinds of different buy-in levels so that you need to have seperate ticket values for all of them. I don't mean to say that UK-tour, DSO and UO should merge, but it should at least have all their BI levels be at the standard 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and/or 100 level. Now you have 4 and 20 euro levels which you either need a specific ticket for or Buy in with cash. (also the 4 euro SNG's need to go and become 5 euro sng's) Also as long as exchanges aren't coming back the satellite system should be simplified. It's annoying that when you start from 1 euro (or even 20c as of a few weeks) you need to play 5 games or so to get your package. And that you could leave empty handed after 4 games by busting the last level. Hard to find a solution for this tough as the player pool isn't that big (so you can't really do 5 -> 100 -> 2000 for example, which would be working at bigger sites) Then something which is happening right now, so not sure if this is a good suggestion... But the MTT shedule needs unification of the names. Get 3 or 4 main types of games with a set structure and spread across all BI levels (Shooting star, Multiverse and singularity for example) and return to conventional nameing for all other games. The nameing now is confusing and hard to understand for new players. Then as cash games are the place you earn the most money, I think it's time to innovate/change there aswell. Zoom-like games seem to be popular on lower levels and maybe add the option to go 9-handed instead of 6-handed only... Same for sng's. Maybe it's time for 8 or 9-handed sng's :) (8 with 3 paid would have the same vision as 5 handed with 2 paid) And finally (back to MTT's) I think Unibet misses SNG satellites to higher level tickets (both for online MTT's and for live events). This way you can reduce the overlaying standard sats, keep some Mega-sats at peak hour and have the rest run as SNG. (If you keep the 5x steps then 12 with 2 paid or 6 with 1 paid would be just fine.)
  12. That is because from the moment the software detects that any other software is interacting with it, it flags the player. :) (To the extreme it could be even taking a screenshot that gets flagged; it doesn't, but it could )
  13. Maybe you just suck at poker :p <3
  14. And can you say whether they are profitable players? (And with what ROI)
  15. I bust wih the KK curse as well :p
  16. Woohoow Got a new (ultra exclusive) badge :D (2 years to late, but oh well :d) thanks @jeppel and @rayl
  17. There have only been between 90 and 100 replies in that topic ;) So you can still ask
  18. Hey zeikosan. The least you can do is speak in English on this forum. Other languages are not allowed
  19. I mean. If the password gets announced it gets announced ;) I know the tournament is already there
  20. @Nestabear just be patient.... If it gets announced it gets announced.
  21. @Patric-Unibet So just a tought I had. Did you guys consider implementing blind levels which lasted a specific amount of hands instead of time. I think this could have worked very well with what you want to reach with the variable blind levels :) Now it will be possible to just stall a level per hand almost (if we take it to the extreme.) Which is enormously profitable for the player who gets an advantage early on.
  22. It won't be there for this month. I can tell you that :p The 31days replace the december mission. LC agents aren't always up-to-date with promotions which are going on (sadly enough)
  23. Funny everyone is complaining about the 7% rake, while the other sites have 8... Also lower rake than in normal sng's is not good. Since it will kill the normal sng's
  24. @Patric-Unibet Maybe I missed it, but in the higher multipliers, will place 2 and 3 also get a small share of the prize? It's a pitty if you'd hit the 1000x and then finish second (certainly when that finish would be with a suckout) Why did you chose for 500 startingstack? In my opinion that's the most annoying part of these games on competitors sites. That you'll get to shoving quickly when you're up against a good player. Starting stacks like in the HU sng's now would be better imo. Certainly because the levels go faster here
×
×
  • Create New...