Nikzzzz

Also received email 😃

Works @Stubbe-Unibet

Yes, i said it had around a 10% marketshare of mac users. I understand completely that that is not a significant amount of your total player pool. I am not expecting there to be detailed testing, or postponement of release if problems are found. I won't claim to have much knowledge of how your testing works, but I will still stand by what i said that spending 10 seconds and opening the dektok app seems like a reasonable check to do for at least the 20 most used systems 😃 The browser client is working fine, and this is more feedback than a big issue for me 👍

Thanks for your answer @Stubbe-Unibet. I understand the challenges with testing on different platforms. However we are not talking about a small bug that is hard to locate, but rather the app not even opening. It should be possible to at least know if the software is working at all on somewhat used operating systems. I am currently on MacOS High Sierra 10.13.6(update from november 2020), with a device from 2016. While indeed an older version High Sierra still has about a 10% marketshare of mac users. It would be nice if in the future there could at least be a note either for support or in the decription of the new download, so i and others dont have to try all kind of sorcery to get the app to work when there is nothing that can be done 😃

One would assume so, which is why i thought the problem originally was one mye end. However this is now the second time in the last 10-15 updates where i am not even able to open the client after an update, before it has turned out that others are having the same issue.

I have had the exact same issue ever since the new release yesterday. I also contacted support who knew nothing. @revvv We are probably just going to have to wait for a fix. Not sure how it is possible to release a update without properly testing it on all devices...

Unfortunately this is a tournament for those that bubbled one of the UOS events not for those that won an event, which i know they have had in the past aswell. Unless you also bubbled a tournament you are not eligible.

Thank you for another very well hosted competition @AndreiBN. 👍 Some great tennis aswell, and a new favourite player in Swiatek for me :inlove: I would like 2x10 + 1x15 freebets please.

R4

Lucky me 😃 I would like a single freebet of 30 euro @AndreiBN. Thank you!

Mondays generally aren't that great of a time for me, so only had the chance to participate 2 times. Nevertheless had fun both times, really enjoyed the streaming and the chatting on twitch, so big thanks to all the organisers. Hopefully I'll be able to join in more next time 👍

Registration has not opened. It opens at 16:30 CEST.

R2:

I was a somewhat disappointet with the actual tennis played at the open this year, but the promotion makes everything a little bit more interesting. Thanks for all the hard work again @AndreiBN, and well done to all the winners.

I remember thay had it on microgaming for a long time. U could turn on or off rabbit cam in settings. Why anyone would ever want to have it on I dont know.

There is always the option to show your stack size according to BBs by changing your settings, then u will not have this problem 😃

I think everyone got 3 tickets today @jerry At least i also did, and there are 2 different tournaments in the lobby today.

I am quite sure they would have been offsides regardless of var, difference is they would have called immediatly and we woudn't have seen goals which lead to this conversation. It is no secret that pre-var they called offsides pretty safely to favour defensive team if it was close call. Nowadays they seem to be afraid to raise the flag cause, you know there is always var to points "Absolute truth" 😏 That might very well be true. I do think refs seem more hesitant now, and often just waiting for VAR to bail them out 🤣

That is the key thing. If something ain't broke, no need to fix it. None complained about chip in ball to tell if it is goal or not, player that don't effect game to be offside, goalkeeper can't take ball to hands when own player passes ball etc cause those made game better and more smooth unlike thise "improvement" straight from hell 🤫 The game is already different without VAR anyway. It is played at a higher pace, and game changing incidents happen more often than they used to. More teams are playing high lines etc. Player transfers are also completely different. A bad season at a different time. No problem, go again next season. Now? Players leave. Losing out on Europe can have enormous consequences for a club for years to come. Again, I come back to the original topic of this discussion. The 4 offside decisions in the Napoli game were all correct with the use of VAR, and it stopped Sassuolo from winning the game. Potentially costing Napoli Europe next season. Players that would have left, might now stay. The consequences of a decision are different than 30 years ago. Irrelevant. To sum up. I dislike VAR because it slows down the game and makes officials lazy. You like it because errors are potentially avoided (if VAR is applied perfectly) The End. Only irrelevant reply here is yours. You could have just moved on, I wasn't even replying to you. I am well aware of your position and that is absolutely fine 😃 My response was a direct reply to what @Livertool Livertool said, and certainly very relevant regardless if people disagree with it. We see things differently, no problem. For me a discussion is not about trying to change peoples mind, and it doesn't have to end just because opinions are different. I enjoy giving my view on football related matters and expressing my opinion without being told they are irrelevant if that is ok with you :lovekiss:

That is the key thing. If something ain't broke, no need to fix it. None complained about chip in ball to tell if it is goal or not, player that don't effect game to be offside, goalkeeper can't take ball to hands when own player passes ball etc cause those made game better and more smooth unlike thise "improvement" straight from hell 🤫 The game is already different without VAR anyway. It is played at a higher pace, and game changing incidents happen more often than they used to. More teams are playing high lines etc. Player transfers are also completely different. A bad season at a different time. No problem, go again next season. Now? Players leave. Losing out on Europe can have enormous consequences for a club for years to come. Again, I come back to the original topic of this discussion. The 4 offside decisions in the Napoli game were all correct with the use of VAR, and it stopped Sassuolo from winning the game. Potentially costing Napoli Europe next season. Players that would have left, might now stay. The consequences of a decision are different than 30 years ago.

Yes abosolutly 😃 Its a good point regarding when to draw the line. It should be when the ball leaves the foot imo, and if done incorrectly even by a small margin that does indeed make a big difference in some cases. I dont know what cameras are used and how many frames pr second they register. However if the player recieving the ball is offside when the player touches the ball and also when the ball has left the foot, it doesnt matter as he is offside regardless. If this is not completely clear i think the goal should be given. Its true the game was fine without VAR. But id bet there are many things you are doing differently now even though you managed fine without them before, things can always get better 😀

Of course. We all want that. But thats never going to happen, so here we are. Not sure what almost restarted means. After a goal theres not a lot of other options to wait before restarting play. It's when they all walk back to the halfway line and stand ready to restart while the referee stands with his hand on his ear listening to the pearls of wisdom from the VAR official. If it was clearly offside it would be sorted quickly. Do you honestly thinkthat the game is better on any level for having VAR? I genuinely don't. I preferred it's beautiful but natural imperfection. Now it's still imperfect (because even cameras don't always make it obvious) but feels weird and unnatural.It's strangling the game, get rid. I am saying i dont understand what else they should do, other then walk back. Basically you are deciding that it was close bacause the referees spent a long time deciding, rather then you looking at the incident and deciding for yourself. I already said, and agree that there is to much time beeing spent reviewing decisions. But thats a result om bad use of VAR not VAR itself. Which will only get better as referees get more used to it. I dont think any of the calls were close when viewed in replay, and they should have made the calls much quicker. I understand your point of view regarding the flow of the game, and as you say natural imperfection. I hope and believe improvments will be made, but regardless; correct decions being made(most of the time) still trumps it for me at the moment.