Poker release notes 31/05/2017

[GamesDean]

Thanks – I didn’t see that post.

[BonusPater]

---

@FeelsBadMan wrote:

---

@MoreTBC wrote:

R.E the winning hand highlighting, could you not just fade the community cards that are not in play?

---

I think this would be a very bad idea, the end board should be clearly visible, making some cards blurry could only lead to confusions, annoyances and complaints based on those confusions. Personally I don't mind the border, maybe trying it out with different colors. If the cards weren't 3d-ish another option would have been to do it like in live games, just raising the cards that are in play, or the ones that are not. 

---

I agree nothing should ever be blurred. Personally I think changing the card positions/size or changing the transparency is the way to go. If the transparency was changed, it could look like below (65 %, 50 % and 35 %).

Card size/position:

[radge1]

Like a lot of the commenters on this thread I don't particularly like the increased pitch of the new cards and the way the flop instantly appears /html/images/emoticons/Asset3.png

As usual with these minor changes I stop noticing them immediately after I have a moan about them 😏

[MoreTBC]

I was meaning a darkening for the card as opposed to a fade so they were still readable but the cards in play stood out more. I also thing an animation moving them up slightly would work well

[Rushbie]

Upvote for 35 % transparency. Rising cards are too trippy imo :laugh:
Edit. On second thought, why not both indeed. Could actually work better :wonder:

[bigboy1314]

love the new site