Ability to hide invitational tournaments from everyone not entitled to enter.

[mastah4]

I feel it might make your job a bit easier so people would not ask to get into invitation only freerolls :) 

[LydiasDaddy19]

@mastah4 hi buddy, I understand it stated invited players only. But from what the lady on live chat said to me sounded like it was the poker community on here that could invite people into the game. Sorry for the misunderstanding

[Pippo]

Unfortunately, who does not like to apply because it would be against you if there were more riders

[RayL]

@mastah4, a good idea, I'll send it to the guys to have a look and advise us if the software is capable of something like this.
@LydiasDaddy19, no damage done sir, stuff like this happens.

[psrquack]

I also suggest a proper description of the tournaments. What I mean invitations only you should be replaced by this tourney is for members pokerdotde, cardschatdotcom or yourpokercashdotcom etc.

[DoktorAvalanche]

So the people who ask for tickets to Invite only games are now going to filter the games they can see so that they can't see Invite only games so they don't ask for tickets to said games.... Am i missing something? 🤣

[psrquack]

@DoktorAvalanche: that's correct.🤣 But please keep on mind that many invite only freerolls are simple password protected freerolls from other sites but unfortunately staff is too lazy making a proper desricption.

[GR1ZZL3R]

@DoktorAvalanche 

[Jami-Unibet]

@psrquack We have had freerolls like that in the past, we have freerolls that are named after the sites they belong to, freerolls that have the site in the description, and freerolls that are described as "Invitation only" or "Invitational". 

I would appreciate not being called lazy nor other staff being called lazy. It's not about that, it's about the steps of eligibility not being made public.

[psrquack]

@ReCorpHthanks for your answer, but can't accept it. I think I just missed all the opportunity for the quackroll but if there is no response (denial would be also fine) for my pm almost for a week after waiting 3 weeks about the result even though you are active, then I would desribe that as lazyness. Btw forget it, won't pm you about it again.

Or not fixing this for 1,5 years also the prototype of lazyness:https://www.unibetcommunity.com/t5/Bug-Reports/Lost-in-translation-and-rugby-rules/idi-p/146650 

But lets back to freerolls:  making a proper description would be a big step towards the players. Unibet should respect our time and give us the informations if freeroll is affiliate site connected or has insider restrictions like rake/various game types etc. I also respect your rigths not making all the criterias public, but separating freerolls to -you have chance playing it if you are connected to our partners and to insider freeroll, no chance to participate on it - should be basic thing for me.

[RayL]

This is not a matter of you accepting or declining anybody's answer @psrquack, the comment in which I mentioned when the tournament will happen was made 2 weeks ago. https://www.unibetcommunity.com/t5/Community-Promotions/Community-Poker-The-weekly-series/m-p/309270#M53858
What is "quackroll" by the way? Anyways, moving on the translation issue: https://www.unibetcommunity.com/t5/Bug-Reports/Lost-in-translation-and-rugby-rules/idi-p/146650
I am not entirely sure about this but I vaguely remember that when this was reported to me via PM, I replied to you and mentioned that we will do our best to have it fixed but since the information is being projected onsite by the provider and we don't personally house this in our servers we don't have access to change it on the drop of a dime. 

What is you point with all this?

 

[Jami-Unibet]

@psrquack, if the reply would be denial I would say it immediately instead of using my time to follow through. But this is not my top priority by any means, a lot more goes on behind the scenes. I will still pursue this and inform you when I know better.

 

[Brocky]

Maybe you should think about how much freeroll players deposit and rake to the site before requesting whatever amount of resources to be allocated to those players.  

The Pareto principle is that 80% of work will come from 20% of players but freeroll hunters aren't even contributing to that 20% so what exactly do you expect?